scholarly journals ESO-based iPI Common Rail Pressure Control of High Pressure Common Rail Injection System

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoping WANG ◽  
Yang TIAN ◽  
Dong ZHENG
2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (21) ◽  
pp. 717-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungwoo Hong ◽  
Jaewook Shin ◽  
Inseok Park ◽  
Myoungho Sunwoo ◽  
Jongik Jeon ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1036-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ferrari ◽  
Ruggero Vitali

A mechanical model of a high-pressure pump of a common rail fuel injection system is presented and validated by comparison with experimental instantaneous pump shaft torque and pump piston lift data. The instantaneous torque has been measured with a high-performance torque meter installed on a hydraulic rig for testing pieces of injection apparatus. In the model, the mechanics of the piston plunger and the forces exchanged between pistons and cam are simulated, and friction losses between mobile parts are taken into account. The numerical tool is used to investigate the dynamical performance of the high-pressure pump and to analyse the impact of the rail pressure control strategy on instantaneous torque, energy saving and flow rate ripple. The rail pressure control strategy, based on the application of a fuel metering valve at the pump inlet, gives rise to an improved hydraulic efficiency of the injection system at part loads and to a moderate rate of pressure increase in the pumping chamber at part loads. However, the rail pressure control strategy based on the installation of a pressure control valve at one rail extremity leads to a reduction in the pump flow rate ripple and to a diminution in the fatigue stress. Furthermore, cavitation problems can occur during intake and early compression phases of the pump cycle when the fuel metering unit is working.


2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 816-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Qing Huang ◽  
You Tong Zhang ◽  
Guo Jun Huang

The precise pressure control in common rail is the prerequisite for the excellent performance of common rail diesel engine. Because of the complexity of engine working conditions, conventional PID controller cannot meet the demand of flexible control of common rail pressure, especially when engine load changes largely and rapidly. To overcome the shortcomings of conventional PID, feed forward Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) has been applied in the common rail pressure control system. The high pressure common rail system layout is drawn and the principle of common rail pressure control is introduced. Four control functions are carried out: “Rail pressure set point calculation”, “Feed forward controller”, “ADRC controller”, and “Flow to duty cycle”. Finally, experimental results comparing between feed forward ADRC controller and conventional PID controller shows that: feed forward ADRC controller is more effective than conventional PID controller because it is smaller in error, quicker in track speed and stronger in anti-jamming ability. It ensures the common rail engine meet the strict specification of the law based on the good dynamic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document