scholarly journals Evaluation of Influence Factors to Reduce Mechanical Stress on the Marginally Resected Mandibular Bone Against Dental Implant-supported Occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohito Tamai ◽  
Makoto Hirota ◽  
Toshinori Iwai ◽  
Mitomu Kioi ◽  
Kenji Mitsudo ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lin ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Naughton Duckmanton ◽  
Michael Swain

2020 ◽  
Vol 899 ◽  
pp. 81-93
Author(s):  
Nur Faiqa Ismail ◽  
M. Saiful Islam ◽  
Solehuddin Shuib ◽  
Rohana Ahmad ◽  
M. Amar Shahmin

This research was conducted to provide a feasible method for reconstructing the 3D model of mandibular bone to undergo finite element analysis to investigate von Mises stress, deformation and shear stress located at the cortical bone, cancellous one and neck implant of the proposed dental implant design. Dental implant has become a significant remedial approach but although the success rate is high, the fixture failure may happen when there are insufficient host tissues to initiate and sustain the osseointegration. Computerised Tomography scan was conducted to generate head images for bone reconstruction process. MIMICS software and 3-matic software were used to develop the 3D mandibular model. The reconstructed mandibular model was then assembled with five different 3D models of dental implants. Feasible boundary conditions and material properties were assigned to the developed muscle areas and joints. The highest performance design with the best responses was the design B with the value for the von Mises stress for the neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone were 7.53 MPa, 16.91 MPa and 1.34 MPa respectively. The values for the maximum of micromotion for the neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone of design B were 20.60 μm, 21.17 μm and 5.83 μm respectively. Shear stress for neck implant, cortical and cancellous bone for this design were 0.15 MPa, 4.74 MPa and 1.54 MPa respectively. The design with a cone shaped hole which is design B was the proper design when compared with other designs in terms of von Misses stress, deformations and shear stress.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010.5 (0) ◽  
pp. 25-26
Author(s):  
Ryuji Shigemitsu ◽  
Tetsuya Matsumoto ◽  
Yu Ishii ◽  
Taro Ishikawa ◽  
Nobuhiro Yoda ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wu ◽  
Lin Zhou ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Bao Zhang ◽  
Yanjun Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation (DN) with a static surgical guide (SSG) for dental implant placement and the influence factors such as the experience of the surgeon and the implant sites. Methods and materials A total of 38 implants, which underwent the dynamic navigation, and 57 implants which underwent a static surgical guide were enrolled in the retrospective study. Coronal deviation, apical deviation, and angular deviation were compared between the DN and SSG groups, along with the different experience level of surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and SSG groups, and the experience level of the surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. However, the apical deviation of the DN was slightly higher than the SSG group in the anterior teeth (P = 0.028), and the angular deviation of DN was smaller than the SSG group in the molar. Conclusion Dynamic navigation can achieve accurate implant placement as well as the static surgical guide. Additionally, the experience level of the surgeon and implant site do not influence the accuracy of dynamic navigation, while the accuracy of DN seems higher than the SSG in molar.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-360
Author(s):  
Eun Joo Choi ◽  
Hyo Joon Kim ◽  
Seong Yong Moon

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Perrella ◽  
Pasquale Franciosa ◽  
Salvatore Gerbino

In the present work the structural behaviour of a mandible with a dental implant, considering a unilateral occlusion, is numerically analysed by means of the Finite Element Method (FEM) and the Boundary Element Method (BEM). The mandible, whose CAD model was obtained by computer tomography scans, is considered as completely edentulous and only modelled in the zone surrounding the implant. The material behaviour of bone is assumed as isotropic linear elastic or, alternatively, as orthotropic linear elastic. With reference to the degree of osteo-integration between the implant and the mandibular bone, a partial osteo-integration is considered; consequently a nonlinear contact analysis is performed, with allowance for friction at the interface between implant and bone. A model of a commercial dental implant is digitised by means of optical 3D scanning process and fully reconstructed in all its geometrical features. Special attention is drawn to the mathematical reconstruction of the CAD model in order to facilitate the meshing process in the BEM environment and reduce the geometrical imperfections generated during the CAD to CAE translation process. The results of FEM and BEM analyses in terms of stress distribution on the mandible are compared in order to benchmark the two methodologies against accuracy and pre-processing efforts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document