scholarly journals Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives Completion of Elderly Patients at a Rural Health Clinic on a Regional Medical Campus

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Irvin ◽  
Melissa McGowan ◽  
Adrienne Zavala

Advance care planning is the shared decision-making process between physicians, patients, and families regarding the patient’s preferences for end of life care. These conversations increase compliance with patient wishes, decrease hospitalizations, increase deaths in patient’s preferred location, and decrease depression in surviving family members3. Even though there is proven benefit from advance care planning, these discussions are often overlooked. The purpose of this study is to evaluate rates of advance care planning and advance directive completion rate of 245 geriatric patients at our rural health clinic training site. We searched the electronic medical record to determine the number of patients who were asked about advance directives, stated they had a living will or medical power of attorney (MPOA), and had a living will or MPOA scanned into their chart. Out of the study population, 45% of patients stated they had some form of advanced directives. Of these patients, 22% and 25% had a living will and MPOA scanned into their chart, respectively. This study demonstrates the need for detailed discussion about advanced care planning with patients and additional follow-up to ensure documentation is readily available.  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Tallat Mahmood ◽  
Jane Alcyne Severson ◽  
Laura Thompson

14 Background: Engagement of oncologists and their care team is essential to ensure advance care planning (ACP) occurs for cancer patients. However, numerous barriers to ACP exists, including the availability of trained staff with competence and confidence to have discussions with patients as well as resources to ensure ACP is effectively and efficiently integrated into the oncology practice. Methods: A baseline audit to determine the presence of documented ACP discussions for patients with metastatic cancer was conducted, followed by a quality improvement program with subsequent reassessment. The baseline audit identified only 20% (10/50) compliance with documentation of such discussions. Subsequently, we joined the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium’s (MOQC) ACP Collaborative where the care team (MA, RN, PA, MD) were taught how to request and complete a durable power of attorney, conduct ACP conversations, and document pertinent information in a standard EHR location. Results: A one-year post-intervention audit found that 80% (40/50) of patients with metastatic cancer had an ACP documented in their record - a four fold improvement. A post-implementation staff survey noted that the team improved their understanding of both the legal issues and importance of asking about advance directives as well as using the designated chart location to document. 100% of staff agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I understand the importance of asking patients about advanced directives”. Staff gained confidence in how to talk to patients about advance directives again with 100% of staff agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement,” I feel more confident now in how to talk to a patient about advanced directives”. Conclusions: It is critical that all members of the oncology care team understand the importance of ACP and that staff feel confident in how to have discussions with patients. While physician/patient discussion is both necessary and expected, patients often discuss their wishes and fears with others in the practice. It is critical that all members of the team understand the importance of and opportunities where they can both support patients’ wishes and direct patients to their oncologist if necessary for further discussion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23181-e23181
Author(s):  
Joanne S. Buzaglo ◽  
Karen E Skinner ◽  
Edward Stepanski ◽  
Cynthia Tankersley ◽  
Lee S. Schwartzberg

e23181 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend that providers encourage early advance care planning with their patients1; yet, many cancer patients do not have advance directives (ADs). A potential reason for low AD rates is inadequate communication between the provider and patient. To address this gap, we developed an outpatient clinic AD initiative for any stage cancer patients via an ePRO system. The AD module was designed to ensure that patients are aware of ADs and to assess whether or not the patient had ADs, specifically a Living Will and/or a durable power of attorney. The study purpose was to assess patient AD status at the patient’s initial visit to an oncology clinic. Methods: This study used a retrospective, observational design that involved use of PRO and clinical data collected via the Patient Care Monitor™ (PCM), a web-based ePRO system linked to electronic medical record data. All data used in this study were collected as part of routine clinical care. All patients at an initial visit to an oncology clinic completed the PCM survey, including the AD module, via a handheld e-tablet. Results: Overall, 9,682 patients completed the AD module (mean age 63; 31% male/69% female; 58% married; 62% White, 35% Black). Cancer type was known for 75% of all patients (29% breast, 11% hematologic, 7% lung, 7% colorectal, 3% prostate, 17% other types). One third of all patients (33%) reported having an AD at the time of the initial visit to the oncology clinic, specifically 24% indicated having a Living Will and 9% a durable power of attorney. The remaining two-thirds (67%) indicated either NOT having an AD (56%) or not knowing if they had an AD (11%). Patients with ADs were more likely to be older ( M=68 v. 60 yrs), male (38% v 31%), White (41% v 20% Black) and married/partnered (35% v 29%); ps <.0001. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the majority of patients do not have ADs at the time of an initial visit to a community-based oncology practice. Using an ePRO system can be an innovative and efficient way to identify unmet needs of patients and link them to resources for developing advance directives. 1Brown AJ, Shen MJ, Urbauer D, et al. Room for improvement: An examination of advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol. Sep 2016;142(3):525-530.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 903-903
Author(s):  
Yifan Lou ◽  
Deborah Carr

Abstract The need for advance care planning (ACP) is heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for older Blacks and Latinx persons who are at a disproportionate risk of death from both infectious and chronic disease. A potentially important yet underexplored explanation for well-documented racial disparities in ACP is subjective life expectancy (SLE), which may impel or impede ACP. Using Health and Retirement Study data (n=7484), we examined the extent to which perceived chances of living another 10 years (100, 51-99, 50, 1-49, or 0 percent) predict three aspects of ACP (living will (LW), durable power of attorney for health care designations (DPAHC), and discussions). We use logistic regression models to predict the odds of each ACP behavior, adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and depressive symptoms. We found modest evidence that SLE predicts ACP behaviors. Persons who are 100% certain they will be alive in ten years are less likely (OR = .68 and .71, respectively) whereas those with pessimistic survival prospects are more likely (OR = 1.23 and 1.15, respectively) to have a LW and a DPAHC, relative to those with modest perceived survival. However, upon closer inspection, these patterns hold only for those whose LW specify aggressive measures versus no LW. We found no race differences for formal aspects of planning (LW, DPAHC) although we did detect differences for informal discussions. Blacks with pessimistic survival expectations are more likely to have discussions, whereas Latinos are less likely relative to whites. We discuss implications for policies and practices to increase ACP rates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1565-1571
Author(s):  
Marjorie Bowman ◽  
Sarah St. Cyr ◽  
Adrienne Stolf i

Objective: To understand how health-care providers’ (HCPs) religious preferences influence their willingness to undertake advance care planning (ACP) with patients and their acceptance of other HCP’s involvement. Methods: Online anonymous survey distributed to HCPs in hospital, ambulatory offices, and hospice settings in Dayton, Ohio. We evaluated the associations of HCP religion with their personal ACP, willingness to facilitate ACP, and acceptance of other HCPs’ ACP participation. Results: 704 respondents: nurses (66.2%), physicians (18.8%), other HCPs (15.0%), white (88.9%), and primarily Catholic (23.3%) or Protestant (32.0%). “No religion” was marked by 13.9%. Respondents were favorable to ACP with patients. Religious respondents were more likely to have a living will ( P = .035) and health-care power of attorney ( P = .007) and more accepting of clergy as ACP decision coaches ( P = .030). HCP’s religion was not associated with willingness to facilitate ACP discussions. There were minor differences between Catholics and Protestants. Conclusions: Personal religious preference is associated with HCP’s own ACP but had little relationship with their willingness to facilitate ACP conversations with patients or acceptance of other professional types of HCPs involvement in ACP conversations. Regardless of religious affiliation, HCPs have interest in undertaking ACP and endorse other HCPs ACP involvement. As results of this study suggest that personal religious affiliation is not a barrier for HCPs engaging in ACP with patients, attempts to overcome barriers to increasing ACP should be directed to other factors.


Sexualities ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 136346071989696
Author(s):  
Brian de Vries ◽  
Gloria Gutman ◽  
Shimae Soheilipour ◽  
Jacqueline Gahagan ◽  
Áine Humble ◽  
...  

Advance care planning (ACP) in North America often takes place in a cultural context of great ambivalence about death and dying, challenging efforts to discuss end-of-life care desires and preparations for death. Such challenges are amplified for sexual and gender minority older adults who often lack connections to traditional heteronormative systems of support. The extent of ACP preparation (completed documents, discussions) and their predictors was examined among a national sample of 91 community-dwelling Canadian LGBT older adults (mean age 68). The sample was disproportionately single and lived alone; more trans participants had children and about half of all participants reported a chosen family. About two-thirds of participants had a will, while less than half had a living will and power of attorney for health care, and a quarter had made informal caregiving arrangements. Just over one-third of respondents reported having discussions about future care and end-of-life plans. The only significant predictors of both ACP documents completed and ACP discussions undertaken were relationship status (those in a relationship were more likely to have engaged in both) and number of children (those with children were less likely to have completed documents). Given that most LGBT older adults are single, efforts must be expanded to reach and engage these individuals in preparing for end of life.


Author(s):  
Jean L. Holley ◽  
J. April Yasunaga

Advance care planning (ACP) is a patient-centered process to elicit patient and family goals and values that shape medical decision-making and form the basis for completing written advance directives. Advance directives such as healthcare power of attorney, surrogate decision-maker identification, and living wills are executed by the patient. These may be supplemented by provider orders such as resuscitation status (do not resuscitate/do not attempt resuscitation) and provider orders for life-sustaining treatment. Provider input into ACP is required as patients and families need information on prognosis and risks and benefits of interventions to make informed decisions. Because health states influence decisions for ongoing care, ACP is a process that requires revisiting wishes and goals via discussions at stages throughout a patient’s life. All healthcare systems through which a patient passes will need to be involved and cognizant of advance directives to ensure a patient’s wishes are honored. Dialysis units are an integral part of the healthcare system for end-stage kidney disease patients and need to be engaged in the ACP process. Consensus statements, guidelines, and tools exist to facilitate ACP in end-stage kidney disease and chronic kidney disease patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace W.K. Ho ◽  
Lauren Skaggs ◽  
Gayane Yenokyan ◽  
Anela Kellogg ◽  
Julie A. Johnson ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:There is a growing body of literature describing the characteristics of patients who plan for the end of life, but little research has examined how caregivers influence patients' advance care planning (ACP). The purpose of this study was to examine how patient and caregiver characteristics are associated with advance directive (AD) completion among patients diagnosed with a terminal illness. We defined AD completion as having completed a living will and/or identified a healthcare power of attorney.Method:A convenience sample of 206 caregiver–patient dyads was included in the study. All patients were diagnosed with an advanced life-limiting illness. Trained research nurses administered surveys to collect information on patient and caregiver demographics (i.e., age, sex, race, education, marital status, and individual annual income) and patients' diagnoses and completion of AD. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to model predictors for patients' AD completion.Results:Over half of our patient sample (59%) completed an AD. Patients who were older, diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and with a caregiver who was Caucasian or declined to report an income level were more likely to have an AD in place.Significance of results:Our results suggest that both patient and caregiver characteristics may influence patients' decisions to complete an AD at the end of life. When possible, caregivers should be included in advance care planning for patients who are terminally ill.


2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Carr

I evaluate the extent to which ethnic disparities in advance care planning reflect cultural and religious attitudes and experience with the painful deaths of loved ones. Data are from a sample of 293 chronically ill older adults who are seeking care at one of two large medical centers in urban New Jersey. Blacks and Hispanics are significantly less likely than Whites to have a living will, a durable power of attorney for health care (DPAHC), and to have discussed their end of life treatment preferences. Multivariate analyses reveal that the Black-White gap in advance care planning is largely accounted for by Blacks' belief that God controls the timing and nature of death. The Hispanic-White gap is partially accounted for by the belief that one's illness negatively affects one's family. Ethnic disparities are starkest for living will and DPAHC use, and less pronounced for discussions. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Susan Ash-Lee ◽  
Leslie T. Busby ◽  
Sami Diab ◽  
Cynthia B. Taniguchi ◽  
Ami Gorsky

7 Background: In Colorado, there is no legal designation as to who is authorized to make healthcare decisions for an adult unable to make decisions for themselves. Completing an advance directive is increasingly associated with better end-of-life outcomes. Failure to complete an advance directive leads to fewer days on hospice and expensive, end-of-life care. It was hypothesized that patients who completed a Medical Durable Power of Attorney (MDPOA) document early may have higher adoption of advance care planning and earlier hospice at end-of-life. Methods: The Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers (RMCC) is the largest private oncology group in Colorado with multiple offices across the state. The RMCC-Pueblo clinic developed and piloted a new patient process where, at registration, all new patients were invited to complete a MDPOA while also completing other new patient forms. The Medical Durable Power of Attorney (MDPOA) is a document that appoints a healthcare decision maker (“healthcare agent”). Data on 4,441 patients from Nov. 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR), including code status, advance care planning counseling appointment, advance directive completion, and outcomes. Results: During this pilot, advance directive capture within the EHR rose from 15.4% to 21.4%. While the number of patients who elected hospice enrollment at the end of life was about the same, the length of hospice stay increased from an average of 14 to over 20 days, a 50% improvement. Conclusions: A MDPOA as a routine part of the new patient intake process is feasible and scalable. It opens the door to future ACP discussions and improved hospice utilization. Because of these findings, we are currently expanding this process to all RMCC practice sites. The results suggest that early completion of an Advance Directive lead to ongoing and healthy discussions about the patient’s end-of-life preferences for care, including appropriate hospice enrollment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document