Balloon Catheter Dilatation for Frontal Sinus Ostium Stenosis in the Office Setting

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amber Luong ◽  
Pete S. Batra ◽  
Samer Fakhri ◽  
Martin J. Citardi
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Office Setting ◽  
Revision Sinus Surgery ◽  
Feasible Alternative ◽  
Sinus Ostium ◽  
Catheter Dilatation

Background Frontal sinus ostium stenosis (FSOS) is problematic even for expert surgeons. Balloon catheter (BC) technology has been recently introduced to rhinology. The aim of this study is to assess technical feasibility and effectiveness of BC dilatation of FSOS in the office setting. Methods This retrospective, multi-institutional case series describes all patients who underwent BC dilatation of FSOS in the office setting in the year ending December 31, 2007. Results Six adult patients underwent a total of seven BC dilatations of FSOS in the clinical setting. The pretreatment ostium size was 1-2 mm. Four of the dilatations were performed with a 5-mm lacrimal BC (LacriCATH, Quest Medical, Allen, TX) and three dilatations were executed with a 7-mm sinus BC (SinuCATH, Quest Medical). All procedures were performed using topical anesthesia only. No complications occurred. Five of the six dilated FSOS dilatations were deemed successful after one BC dilatation. One ostium contracted >50% and required repeat BC dilatation. All ostia have remained patent with a follow-up range of 4-9 months. No subject has required formal surgical revision. Conclusion This preliminary report describes BC of FSOS in the office setting. The technique may serve as a safe and feasible alternative, potentially avoiding formal revision sinus surgery in select patients.

scholarly journals In-Office Use of a Steroid-Eluting Implant for Maintenance of Frontal Ostial Patency after Revision Sinus Surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. ar.2015.6.0104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Janisiewicz ◽  
Jivianne T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Revision Sinus Surgery ◽  
History Of ◽  
Surgical Failure ◽  
Subsequent Relapse

Achieving long-term, successful outcomes with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) can be challenging in patients with recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Local complications, including scar formation and ostial stenosis, can lead to recurrent blockage and subsequent relapse. The frontal sinus is particularly vulnerable to surgical failure given its narrow outflow and inaccessibility to topical therapies. The advent of steroid-eluting sinus implants has enhanced ESS outcomes, with significant reductions in synechiae, inflammation, and secondary postoperative interventions when placed in the ethmoid cavity. However, use of this technology in the frontal sinus has yet to be described. The purpose of this report is to present two cases, in which in-office frontal placement of a mometasone furoate (MF)-eluting implant facilitated maintenance of ostial patency after revision ESS. The clinical presentation, in-office intervention, and treatment outcomes were examined. Two patients (male, 63 and 68 years of age) with a history of multiple ESS presented with recurrent unilateral frontal headache refractory to medical therapy. Nasal endoscopy/imaging revealed frontal sinus outflow obstruction. Both declined revision ESS under general anesthesia and underwent endoscopic frontal sinustomy/ostial dilation in the clinic. A MF-eluting implant was placed in the frontal sinus at the end of the procedure, with preservation of ostial patency upon last follow-up at 3 and 11 months, respectively. In-office placement of a MF-eluting implant successfully maintained frontal ostial patency in patients with a history of multiple ESS. Additional randomized trials are necessary to determine statistical significance, cost-effectiveness analysis, and long-term efficacy of frontal sinus implantation.

scholarly journals Implication of osteoplastic flap for frontal sinus surgery in the endoscopic era

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1717
Author(s):  
Aishwarya Raj Pillai Devaraj ◽  
Kothegala Chandrashekariah Prasad ◽  
Abhilasha Karunasagar ◽  
Manna Jose Pappanacherry ◽  
Harshitha Naganna Gowda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Traffic Accident ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Nasal Bone ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Wall ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Good Cosmesis

<p class="abstract">In the present era where functional endoscopic sinus surgery is the mainstay of management for any frontal sinus disease, we present a case series comprising six cases of various frontal sinus pathology that were managed with an external approach using a bicoronal osteoplastic flap technique of which three cases were of inverted papilloma, one case of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, one case of frontal mucocele and a case of road traffic accident with frontal bone and nasal bone fracture. The cases had a mean follow-up period of 6 months. There was no recurrence of disease and no significant postoperative complications have been reported during the follow-up period so far. Osteoplastic anterior wall approach to the frontal sinus has proved to be one of the most effective, simple, and reliable procedures with excellent success rate and good cosmesis.</p>

scholarly journals Extended endoscopic frontal nasal sinus surgery in management of chronic and recurrent frontal sinus diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sobhi Abdelaal ◽  
Mohamed Kamel Al Awady ◽  
Tawfik Abdelaty Elkholy
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Anatomical Variation ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Frontal Sinusitis ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Nasal Sinus ◽  
Frontal Sinus Surgery ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Intimate Relation

Abstract Background The anatomical variation of the frontal sinus and its intimate relation to the skull base and orbit makes its surgery demanding. The extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery allows wide better drainage and preventing the recurrence of the disease. Fourteen patients underwent EEFSS from May 2017 to May 2019. These patients are nine patients presented by chronic recurrent frontal sinusitis, three patients presented by chronic recurrent fronto ethmoidal mucocele and two patients with chronic recurrent external frontal fistula. Draff III done for ten patients of them and Draff IIB done for four patients of them. This study is designed for evaluating the efficacy of the extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (E E F S S) in management of chronic and recurrent frontal sinus diseases. Results The neo opening of the restored frontal sinus was remained opened with Draff III with high success rate; two patients from four patients with Draff IIb were with closed nasofrontal duct. The main follow-up was 12 months; the patients were followed up post-operatively for many office visits without any other manifestations. Conclusion The chronic recurrent frontal sinus diseases can be treated successfully with extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (E E F S S). The extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (Draff III) provides good results with low morbidity and less post-operative care.

Revision Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Objective and Subjective Surgical Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Christopher McMains ◽  
Stilianos E. Kountakis
Keyword(s):  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Patient Symptom ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Revision Sinus Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
The Mean

Background The aim of this study was to report objective and subjective outcomes after revision sinus surgery (RESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in 125 patients requiring revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery after failing both maximum medical therapy and prior sinus surgery for CRS. Patients were seen and treated over a 3-year period (1999–2001) in a tertiary rhinology setting. Computed tomography (CT) scans were graded as per Lund-MacKay and patient symptom scores were recorded using the Sinonasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20) instrument. Individual rhinosinusitis symptoms were evaluated on a visual analog scale (0–10) before and after surgery. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results The mean number of prior sinus procedures was 1.9 ± 0.1 (range, 1–7) and the mean preoperative CT grade was 13.4 ± 0.7. Patients with asthma and polyposis had higher CT scores than those without these processes. Preoperative mean SNOT-20 and endoscopy scores were 30.7 ± 1.3 and 7.3 ± 0.4, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, mean SNOT-20 and endoscopy scores improved to 7.7 ± 0.6 and 2.1 ± 0.4, respectively (p < 2.8 X 10-10). At 12-month follow-up, each individual symptom score decreased significantly. Overall, 10 patients failed RESS and required additional surgical intervention for an overall failure rate of 8.0%. All patients who failed RESS had nasal polyposis. Conclusion Revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery benefits patients that fail maximum medical therapy and prior sinus surgery for CRS by objective and subjective measures.

scholarly journals Draf III frontal sinus surgery for the treatment of Pott’s puffy tumour in adults: our case series and a review of frontal sinus anatomy risk factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 277 (8) ◽  
pp. 2271-2278
Author(s):  
Alfonso Luca Pendolino ◽  
Foteini Stefania Koumpa ◽  
Henry Zhang ◽  
Samuel C. Leong ◽  
Peter J. Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Frontal Sinus Surgery ◽  
Draf Iii

Long-term stenting for chronic frontal sinus disease: case series and literature review

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1216-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Hunter ◽  
S Silva ◽  
R Youngs ◽  
A Saeed ◽  
V Varadarajan
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Narrow Channels ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Disease Case

AbstractObjective:The frontal sinus outflow tract consists anatomically of narrow channels prone to stenosis. Following both endonasal and external approach surgery, up to 30 per cent of patients suffer post-operative re-stenosis of the frontal sinus outflow tract, with recurrent frontal sinus disease. This paper proposes the surgical placement of a long-term frontal sinus stent to maintain fronto-nasal patency, as an alternative to more aggressive surgical procedures such as frontal sinus obliteration and modified Lothrop procedures.Design:We present a series of three patients with frontal sinus disease and significant co-morbidity, the latter making extensive surgery a significant health risk. We also review the relevant literature and discuss the use of long-term frontal sinus stenting.Results:These three cases were successfully treated with long-term frontal sinus stenting. Stents remained in situ for a period ranging from 48 to over 60 months.Conclusion:Due to the relatively high failure rates for both endonasal and external frontal sinus surgery, with a high post-operative incidence of frontal sinus outflow tract re-stenosis, long-term stenting is a useful option in carefully selected patients.

Complications Are Rare From Middle Turbinate Resection: A Prospective Case Series

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Pinther ◽  
Robert Deeb ◽  
Edward L. Peterson ◽  
Robert T. Standring ◽  
John R. Craig
Keyword(s):  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Prospective Case Series ◽  
Polyp Recurrence ◽  
Snot 22

Background When chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) fails to respond to medical therapy, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) plays an integral role in management. Some studies have shown that middle turbinate resection (MTR) during ESS leads to decreased polyp recurrence and revision ESS rates. Other studies suggest MTR can lead to complications. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of MTR during ESS for CRSwNP by determining the incidences of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and postoperative complete frontal stenosis. Methods A multiinstitutional, prospective case series of 91 adult CRSwNP patients was conducted. Patients with medically refractory CRSwNP underwent primary or revision ESS plus MTR by 3 surgeons. Two of the surgeons performed partial MTRs, and one of the surgeons performed complete MTRs. Patients were evaluated for the following complications: intraoperative CSF leak during MTR, postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and postoperative complete frontal ostial stenosis. Secondary outcomes included changes from preoperative to postoperative 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores and revision ESS rates. Results Unilateral or bilateral complete ESSs with MTRs were performed on 91 CRSwNP patients. In total, 173 MTRs were performed. Two surgeons performed 97 partial MTRs on 49 patients, and the third surgeon performed 76 complete MTRs on 42 patients. One CSF leak occurred during partial MTR (1/173, 0.57%). No patients suffered postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and no patients developed complete frontal stenosis. From preoperatively to postoperatively, mean SNOT-22 scores decreased from 53.7 to 13.1 ( P = .001). No revision ESS was needed during the follow-up period. Mean follow-up time was 7.5 ± 5.4 months. Conclusions Partial and complete MTR during ESS for CRSwNP in this cohort resulted in very low, acceptable intraoperative and short-term postoperative complication rates and no detriment to SNOT-22 scores.

scholarly journals The Bifurcated Frontal Sinus

OTO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473974X1876487
Author(s):  
Edward D. McCoul ◽  
Kiranya E. Tipirneni
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Common Wall ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
Extent Of Surgery

Objectives Frontal sinus anatomy is complex, and multiple variations of ethmoid pneumatization have been described that affect the frontal outflow tract. In addition, the lumen proper of the frontal sinus may exist as 2 separate parallel cavities that share an ipsilateral outflow tract. This variant has not been previously described and may have implications for surgical management. Study Design Case series. Setting Tertiary rhinology practice. Subjects and Methods Cases with radiographic and intraoperative findings of separate parallel tracts within a unilateral frontal sinus were identified from a consecutive series of 186 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery between May 2015 and July 2016. Data were recorded including sinusitis phenotype, coexisting frontal cells, and extent of surgery. Results Ten patients (5.4%) were identified with computed tomography scans demonstrating bifurcation of the frontal sinus into distinct medial and lateral lumens. All cases were treated with Draf 2a or 2b frontal sinusotomy with partial removal of the common wall to create a unified ipsilateral frontal ostium. Eleven sides had a coexisting ipsilateral agger nasi cell, 7 had a supra-agger cell, 8 had a suprabullar cell, and 1 had a frontal septal cell. There were no significant complications. Conclusion The bifurcated frontal sinus is an anatomic variant that the surgeon should recognize to optimize surgical outcomes. Failure to do so may result in incomplete clearance of the sinus and residual disease. The bifurcated sinus may occur with other types of frontal sinus cells and may be safely treated with endoscopic techniques.

Balloon catheter sinusotomy: One-year follow-up—Outcomes and role in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (3_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S27-S37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick A. Kuhn ◽  
Christopher A. Church ◽  
Andrew N. Goldberg ◽  
Howard L. Levine ◽  
Michael J. Sillers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
One Year

Endoscopic Surgery for Frontal and Ethmoid Sinus Mucoceles

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Ethmoid Sinus ◽  
Endoscopic Approach ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Difficult Cases

Seven patients with frontal and ethmoid mucoceles treated by endoscopic sinus surgery were reviewed. Five cases were successfully managed, with two requiring a trephine procedure in combination with the intranasal endoscopic approach. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 33 months with a mean of 17.8 months. The use of endoscopic instruments through a trephine incision is recommended in difficult cases to assure patency of the frontal sinus recess. When a large frontal sinus mucocele extends into the anterior ethmoid, the endoscopic approach becomes ideal. Sinus mucoceles can be handled safely and successfully by endoscopic surgery and may eliminate the need for more traditional external procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document