scholarly journals Extended endoscopic frontal nasal sinus surgery in management of chronic and recurrent frontal sinus diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sobhi Abdelaal ◽  
Mohamed Kamel Al Awady ◽  
Tawfik Abdelaty Elkholy

Abstract Background The anatomical variation of the frontal sinus and its intimate relation to the skull base and orbit makes its surgery demanding. The extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery allows wide better drainage and preventing the recurrence of the disease. Fourteen patients underwent EEFSS from May 2017 to May 2019. These patients are nine patients presented by chronic recurrent frontal sinusitis, three patients presented by chronic recurrent fronto ethmoidal mucocele and two patients with chronic recurrent external frontal fistula. Draff III done for ten patients of them and Draff IIB done for four patients of them. This study is designed for evaluating the efficacy of the extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (E E F S S) in management of chronic and recurrent frontal sinus diseases. Results The neo opening of the restored frontal sinus was remained opened with Draff III with high success rate; two patients from four patients with Draff IIb were with closed nasofrontal duct. The main follow-up was 12 months; the patients were followed up post-operatively for many office visits without any other manifestations. Conclusion The chronic recurrent frontal sinus diseases can be treated successfully with extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (E E F S S). The extended endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (Draff III) provides good results with low morbidity and less post-operative care.

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
H A K A Mansour

AbstractObjective:Frontal sinus surgery continues to challenge even the most experienced endoscopic sinus surgeon. Revision frontal sinus surgery is even more challenging. The use of stents in frontal sinus surgery has long been described, as an attempt to decrease the incidence of synechiae and stenosis.Method:This study included five patients who had previously undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery but suffered recurrence of frontal sinusitis. Two had bilateral disease. Double J stents were used after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy. The stents were left in place for six months.Results:Four of the 5 patients (6 out of 7 sinuses) had a patent frontal outflow tract after 10 to 36 months’ follow up.Conclusion:Double J stents can be used as frontal sinus stents. They are well tolerated by patients, easily applied, and self-retaining with no need for sutures. The length of the stent can be altered according to the patient's anatomy and pathology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Khan ◽  
Waleed A. Alshareef ◽  
Osama A. Marglani ◽  
Islam R. Herzallah

Introduction. Frontal sinus surgery remains challenging to manage because of its complex anatomy and narrow outflow tract. A number of studies suggest the success of frontal sinus stenting to reduce postoperative complications in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, failure and complications of frontal sinus stenting may occur. Method. We present a case of frontal sinus stenting with migration of the stent and erosion of the lamina papyracea together with a granulomatous reaction around the stent. PubMed and Medline search was also conducted to study the current evidence on frontal sinus stenting benefits and complications. Results. Still there are no guidelines or universally accepted indications for the use of frontal sinus stenting in the literature. A limited number of studies suggest the success of frontal sinus stenting to reduce postoperative stenosis in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, failure and complications of frontal sinus stenting may occur. Infection, pain, edema, and stent obstruction may also occur. Our case report also highlights the potential of orbital complications as well as the consequences of inducing a granulomatous reaction. Conclusion. The value of frontal sinus stenting is still a subject of debate. Complications of frontal sinus stenting are not uncommon and thus necessitate regular follow-up.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Ma ◽  
Tiansheng Wang ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang ◽  
Chen Yu ◽  
Heqing Li ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P81-P81
Author(s):  
Nicolas BuSaba ◽  
Stacey T. Gray

Objective To determine the current indications for osteoplastic frontal sinus obliteration (OFSO) for the treatment of inflammatory frontal sinus disease. Methods Retrospective case series from a single tertiary care facility. The medical records of 35 patients who underwent OFSO for chronic frontal sinusitis (n=26) and frontal sinus mucocele (n=9) between 1995 and 2007 were reviewed. Data regarding age, gender, date and nature of previous frontal sinus operation(s), pre-operative imaging, pre-operative diagnosis, and operative complications were culled. Results There were 19 males and 16 females with an age range of 19 to 76 years. All patients had pre-operative sinus CT, while 6 patients had additional MRI. Among the 9 patients diagnosed with frontal sinus mucocele, OFSO was first-line treatment in 8 and salvage for 2 failed endoscopic masupialization procedures in 1. Among the 26 patients with chronic frontal sinusitis, OFSO was first-line in 9 and salvage for failed frontal sinus surgery in 17. The failed surgeries were OFSO (n=7), Lynch procedure (n=2), and endoscopic frontal sinus surgery including drill-out (n=10). Five patients failed multiple previous operations. The failed operations dated from 1 to 33 years prior to the present illness in the case of OFSO, 1 to 4 years in the case of Lynch procedure, and 1 to 7 years in the case of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. There was one reported complication (orbital hematoma). Conclusions OFSO remains a key surgical treatment for frontal sinus mucocele, but is used more commonly as a salvage procedure for chronic frontal sinusitis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Smita Upadhyay ◽  
Lamia Buohliqah ◽  
Gerival Junior ◽  
Bradley Otto ◽  
Daniel Prevedello ◽  
...  

ORL ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Bing ◽  
Han Demin ◽  
Liu Huachao ◽  
Huang Qian ◽  
Zhang Luo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P74-P75
Author(s):  
Peter Doble ◽  
Robert C Kern ◽  
Nicolas Busaba ◽  
Khajornkiat Prasittivatechakool

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955061988494
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Makihara ◽  
Shin Kariya ◽  
Mitsuhiro Okano ◽  
Tomoyuki Naito ◽  
Kensuke Uraguchi ◽  
...  

Objective: The agger nasi cell (ANC) is an easily identifiable landmark when approaching the frontal sinus. The success of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery may be influenced by the width of the frontal recess (FR). The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the FR width and the ANC size in Japanese patients. In addition, the effect of various frontal recess cells (FRCs) on the development of frontal sinusitis has been examined. Materials and methods: Multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in 95 patients (190 sides) before endoscopic sinus surgery were reviewed. The presence of FRCs, the thickness of the frontal beak (FB), the ANC size, and the anterior-to-posterior (A-P) length of the frontal isthmus (FI) and FR were evaluated in patients with and without frontal sinusitis. Results: The prevalence of the ANC, frontal cell types 1, 2, 3, and 4, frontal bullar cell (FBC), suprabullar cell, supraorbital ethmoid cell, and interfrontal sinus septal cell was 85.3%, 11.6%, 0%, 7.9%, 0%, 25.3%, 45.8%, 16.8%, and 15.3%, respectively. The ANC volume showed a significant positive correlation with the A-P length of the FI and FR. The incidence of frontal sinusitis in the patients with FBCs was significantly higher than that without FBCs. Conclusion: A large ANC offers a greater potential to facilitating the approach to the frontal sinus because of the extensiveness of the FR in Japanese patients. The presence of FBCs may be related to a higher incidence of frontal sinusitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document