Patient opinion and knowledge on drug use: a pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. A5.4
Author(s):  
Saša Vukmirović
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 832-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis I. Achike ◽  
John Smith ◽  
Stuart Leonard ◽  
Janet Williams ◽  
Felicia Browning ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emelie Wolgast ◽  
Ann Josefsson ◽  
Martin Josefsson ◽  
Caroline Lilliecreutz ◽  
Margareta Reis
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER G. MILLER ◽  
JENNIFER JOHNSTON ◽  
PAUL R. McELWEE ◽  
RICK NOBLE
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 859-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Deilamizade ◽  
Sara Esmizade

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Isabel García-López ◽  
Javier Ezequiel Fuentes-Ríos ◽  
Silvia Manrique-Rodríguez ◽  
Cecilia M. Fernández-Llamazares

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Han ◽  
Jing Ying Zhang ◽  
Yih-Ing Hser ◽  
Di Liang ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Mobile health technologies have been found to improve the self-management of chronic diseases. However, there is limited research regarding their feasibility in supporting recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs) in China. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of a mobile phone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) app by testing the concordance of drug use assessed by the EMA, urine testing, and a life experience timeline (LET) assessment. METHODS A total of 75 participants dependent on heroin or amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) in Shanghai were recruited to participate in a 4-week pilot study. Of the participants, 50 (67% [50/75]) were randomly assigned to the experimental group and 25 (33% [25/75]) were assigned to the control group. The experimental group used mobile health (mHealth) based EMA technology to assess their daily drug use in natural environments and received 2 short health messages each day, whereas the control group only received 2 short health messages each day from the app. Urine tests and LET assessments were conducted each week and a post-intervention survey was administered to both groups. The correlations among the EMA, the LET assessment, and the urine test were investigated. RESULTS The mean age of the participants was 41.6 (SD 8.0) years, and 71% (53/75) were male. During the 4 weeks of observation, 690 daily EMA survey data were recorded, with a response rate of 49.29% (690/1400). With respect to drug use, the percent of agreement between the EMA and the LET was 66.7%, 79.2%, 72.4%, and 85.8%, respectively, for each of the 4 weeks, whereas the percent of agreement between the EMA and the urine test was 51.2%, 65.1%, 61.9%, and 71.5%, respectively. The post-intervention survey indicated that 46% (32/70) of the participants preferred face-to-face interviews rather than the mHealth app. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated poor agreement between the EMA data and the LET and found that the acceptance of mHealth among individuals with SUDs in China was not positive. Hence, greater efforts are needed to improve the feasibility of mHealth in China.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanique A. Anderson ◽  
Linda Gröning

This article addresses rehabilitation, its conceptualisation by officers and inmates, and its expression in practice within a select Norwegian prison. It reports on findings from a qualitative interview-based research project conducted as a pilot study, whereby semi-structured interviews were conducted with inmates and officers at the prison. Furthermore, the authors examine the principle of rehabilitation as it follows from Norwegian law and assess how it is implemented in practice in a Norwegian prison. The preliminary findings from the study reveal factors—such as inmate isolation and mental health challenges, drug use, unequal treatment, and limited capacity and resources—that are impacting the effectiveness of what the prison has intended to achieve and ask for further research and discussion in this area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document