Legal Analysis of the Tax Legislation of Ukraine in the Field of Alienation and Management of a Real Estate

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Telizhenko ◽  
Iryna Lukasevych-Krutnyk ◽  
Iryna Storozhuk ◽  
Kostiantyn Iskrov ◽  
Nataliia Kovalko ◽  
...  

The primary purpose of this study is to carry out a legal analysis of the tax legislation of Ukraine when concluding transactions for the alienation of real estate. The authors face the task of careful and in-depth consideration of both theoretical and practical issues of legal regulation of taxes and fees in the alienation of real estate, the search for effective mechanisms for their collection, improving the tax burden on the taxpayer. This article presents the main aspects of the taxation of real estate transactions, which are subject to notarization. In particular, the provisions of the legislation on the peculiarities of personal income tax, military tax on purchase and sale transactions, real estate by individuals resident and non-residents of Ukraine, as well as the peculiarities of calculating the fee to the Pension Fund of Ukraine for the purchase of real estate are certain generalized functions of a notary as a tax agent exercising tax control.In the analysis of tax law in transactions for the sale of real estate, the authors used a comparative - legal method to identify similarities or differences in tax rates, the effectiveness of regulatory action of official - documentary methods of expression, the descriptive direction of the material prevails.

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Edyta Jóźwiak

In Polish tax law, real estate is subject to taxation. Property tax rates depend not only on the type of property but also on the taxable person. Thus, as far as persons conducting business activity are concerned, real estate in their possession is taxed at a higher rate than that of natural persons. The amount of the tax payable annually may exceed the income of the trader concerned, since it does not depend on the taxable person's financial situation (as is the case with other taxes, e.g. personal income tax). Due to this fact, a catalog of tax reliefs and exemptions, i.e. the so-called tax subsidies, as well as the possibility of spreading the tax in instalments and deferring its payment date is an important role in real estate tax. The state, including municipalities, may create this form of aid, as long as it does not conflict with the provisions of the Act on State Aid and similar provisions in force in the European Union, which are designed to observe free competition in the market. The purpose of this Article is to indicate what are the current forms of assistance to entrepreneurs on the example of property tax.


Author(s):  
Olena Hedziuk

 The paper is designed to present the legal regulation of income taxation of self-employed attorney. For tax purposes, the attorney who carries out the activity is an individually self-employed person, namely, a person who pursues an independent professional activity.      An individual who intends to pursue independent professional activity is obliged to register with the supervisory authorities at their place of residence as self-employed persons. If a person is registered as an entrepreneur and at the same time this person carries out an independent professional activity, such an individual is accounted for the controlling bodies as an entrepreneur with a sign of pursuing the independent professional activity.       Income received during the calendar year from conducting independent professional activity is taxed on the personal income tax at the rate of 18%. Taxable income is the cumulative net income, that is the difference between the income and the documented expenses required to pursue a certain type of independent professional activity. Individuals engaged in an independent professional activity are obliged to keep records of income and expenses from such activity.       In addition to the personal income tax, attorneys also pay a military levy and a single social contribution.      Discussion issues in the enforcement of tax law were distinguished: the issue of taking into account expenses in determining taxable income for taxation of income received by an attorney, as well as problem of payment of the single social contribution in the case of combining business activity and independent professional activity. In this situation, the tax authorities believe that the taxpayer must pay a single social contribution twice as an entrepreneur and as a person who provides independent professional activity. Courts often support taxpayers and confirm that a person should only pay a single social contribution as an entrepreneur. Tax authorities’ explanations remain unchanged.     To avoid double taxation and to ensure the implementation of the principles of tax law, in our opinion, this issue needs attention from the tax authorities and an up-to-date analysis tax legislation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
TANAPONG DAMKERNGKHAJORNWONG

Abstract This article indicates how tax legislations, both in direct and indirect fields, of ASEAN countries should be harmonized. With respect to direct taxation, the issue of direct tax rates harmonization - personal income tax and corporate income tax - will firstly be discussed. Further, I will look into how the personal income tax treatment on a resident exercising the free movement of skilled labour should be. In addition, how to enhance the network of tax treaties between ASEAN Member States and withholding tax levied on cross-border transaction will also be described. As regards indirect taxation, I will consider to what extent such the consumption tax systems as VAT and GST in each ASEAN countries could be in accordance with each other. Finally, what challenges over tax harmonization in ASEAN can be will be noted. The majority of the discussions above will be based upon the tax harmonization and coordination already conducted within the EU. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
TANAPONG DAMKERNGKHAJORNWONG

Abstract This article indicates how tax legislations, both in direct and indirect fields, of ASEAN countries should be harmonized. With respect to direct taxation, the issue of direct tax rates harmonization - personal income tax and corporate income tax - will firstly be discussed. Further, I will look into how the personal income tax treatment on a resident exercising the free movement of skilled labour should be. In addition, how to enhance the network of tax treaties between ASEAN Member States and withholding tax levied on cross-border transaction will also be described. As regards indirect taxation, I will consider to what extent such the consumption tax systems as VAT and GST in each ASEAN countries could be in accordance with each other. Finally, what challenges over tax harmonization in ASEAN can be will be noted. The majority of the discussions above will be based upon the tax harmonization and coordination already conducted within the EU. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-710
Author(s):  
Olga I. Lyutova ◽  
Irina D. Fialkovskaya

The article is devoted to the problems of improving the tax legislation of Russia at the stage of active implementation of blockchain technology, which is characterized by contradictory trends in the legal regulation of digital technologies. The relevance of the study of application of blockchain in tax relations is due to the need to assess the tax consequences of transactions using digital financial assets, as well as emergence of new directions for improving tax control based on blockchain technology. The purpose of the study is to analyze the provisions of Russian and foreign tax legislation, as well as doctrinal sources on improving legal regulation of tax relations in regard to blockchain technology. The study shows efficacy of the blockchain analysis for the purposes of tax and legal regulation carried out by developing concepts related to applying such technological solution as a tool in conducting cryptocurrency transactions. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the authors definition of the concept of blockchain technology for tax purposes, as well as in proving the value of legal regulation of tax relations applying blockchain. The practical implication is connected with voicing the need to develop legal regulation of applying blockchain technology when creating a system of transactional (automatic) taxation and levying the so-called smart taxes while fulfilling tax obligations in the context of introducing a goods traceability mechanism. This will also contribute to minimizing tax reporting. The research methodology are general and private scientific methods of knowledge: formal-legal, analysis, comparative-legal, and forecasting and modeling. The last two are often applied in tax law in light of digitalization and globalization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-177
Author(s):  
I. V. Glazunova ◽  
К. I. Chernikova

The subject of the research is the legal norms contained in legislation and other legal acts that regulate the grounds for the emergence and the mechanism for implementing the status of an accredited investor, requirements for individuals, as well as certain aspects of taxation of accredited investors. The experience of legal regulation of income from investment activities, used in foreign legislation, is also analyzed in the context of the topic.The purpose of the article is to confirm the need to revise the requirements for accredited investors, to clarify the legislative provisions of the personal income tax. The reason for this study was legislative changes that caused an ambiguous reaction among the entire legal community in Russia.The methodology. General scientific methods were applied in the framework of a comparative, logical and statistical study and analysis of law enforcement and judicial practice in the field of taxation of an accredited investors.The main results. The following issues were investigated. What was the reason for the introduction of the status of an accredited investor in Russian legislation? It was the need firstly to protect the rights of investors, and secondly to regulate and protect the stock market from unconsciously high-risk transactions. What requirements are specified in the law for obtaining this status, what requirements exist in foreign legislation and why does domestic legislation need to be revised? We can divide the requirements for obtaining the status into three general groups: experience, knowledge and risk. Investor is obliged to meet two criteria by European legislation, when only one criterion by Russian legislation. The problem of taxation of qualified investors was raised in the context of the progressive income tax rate. Taxation of qualified investors needs a thorough legislative review in terms of tax deductions.Conclusions. The ideas for the introduction of the status of an accredited investor, of a progressive personal income tax rate were implemented in Russian legislation from the legislation of foreign countries. Such Russian legal rules needs significant revision. The legislative term "accredited investor" should be introduced in legislation system. It is necessary to clarify the criteria for obtaining a status, as well as to consolidate the necessity for accredited investors to comply with two conditions instead of one. Such an initiative would allow investors themselves to approach investing more consciously and would remove risks from brokers. Tax legislation should be amended in part of tax deductions for persons whose main activity is investment, since the current state of affairs discriminates them against individuals in their rights. The revision of the fixed requirements as well as the clarification of the tax legislation will attract investors (both Russian and foreign) to the Russian stock market, while the economy will receive positive growth, intermediaries-brokers and issuing firms will be provided with protection from unconscious risks.


2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Stanovnik ◽  
Miroslav Verbič

This paper analyses the distribution of employee earnings in Slovenia in the period 1991–2009. The analysis is based on large samples from the personal income tax (PIT) files. According to the Gini coefficient, increases in earnings inequality were moderate; however, relatively large increases in the shares accruing to the top 5% and top 1% of employees did occur. Inequality of employees’ after-tax earnings (i.e. net of employee social contributions and PIT) remained fairly stable in this time period, due to the increasing progressivity of PIT, as shown by the Kakwani index of progressivity. Increases in progressivity of the personal income tax came in leaps, following the introduction of new income tax legislation. Institutional settings and the introduction of minimum wage legislation in 1995 also appear to havemoderated inequality increases, which were quite large in the early years of the transition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (88) ◽  
pp. 217-232
Author(s):  
Miloš Vasović

The Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act contains a provision on the beneficial ownership of income (hereinafter: the BO provision), which is one of the conditions for the application of the preferential tax rate on income tax after tax deduction, which is envisaged in Treaties for the avoidance of Double Taxation on income and capital (hereinafter: Double Taxation Treaties/ DTTs). The subject matter of research in this paper is the term "beneficial ownership", which is not defined in the Corportate Income Tax Act. It may ultimately lead to abusing the preferential tax rates from the DTTs in tax planning and "treaty shopping" through the use of conduit companies. Tax experts have different opinions on the legal nature of the BO provision, which is given the function of an anti-abusive measure (on the one hand) and a rule for the attribution of income (on the other hand). The author analyzes the current function of the BO provision envisaged in the Serbian Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act (CITA), and its inadequate application. The author advocates for enacting the BO provision as an anti-abusive measure, and examines the possible application of the BO provision in domestic tax law, with reference to Articles 10, 11, and 12 of the DTTs that Serbia contracted with other states, as well as Articles 10-12 of the OECD Model-Convention on Income and Capital (2017) and Commentaries on these articles. Such an application of the BO provision may preclude "treaty shopping". In final remarks, the author points out why the BO provision should be envisaged as an anti-abusive measure in Serbian tax law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document