An applied program of aviation safety training for the Civil Aviation Flying College of China

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lanier
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Safety Training ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Applied Program

scholarly journals Learning from incidents in aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness: regulation, practice and gaps

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Clare ◽  
Kyriakos I. Kourousis
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Aircraft Maintenance ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
Safety Systems ◽  
Incident Learning

Purpose The ability to learn from previous events in support of preventing future similar events is a valuable attribute of aviation safety systems. A primary constituent of this mechanism is the reporting of incidents and its importance in support of developing learning material. Many regulatory requirements clearly define a structure for the use of learning material through organisational and procedural continuation training programmes. This paper aims to review aviation regulation and practice, highlighting the importance of learning as a key tenet of safety performance. Design/methodology/approach Applicable International Civil Aviation Organisation requirements and the European Union (EU) regulation in aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness management have been critically reviewed through content analysis. Findings This review has identified gaps in the European implementing rules that could be addressed in the future to support a more effective approach to the delivery of lessons in the aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness management sector. These include light-touch of learning and guidance requirements, lack of methodologies for the augmentation of safety culture assessment, absence of competence requirements for human factors trainers and lack of guidance on standardised root-cause analyses. Practical implications This paper offers aviation safety practitioners working within the European Aviation Safety Agency regulatory regime an insight into important matters affecting the ability to learn from incidents. Originality/value This paper evaluates critically and independently the regulation and practice that can affect the ability of EU regulated aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness management organisations to learn from incidents. The outputs from this research present a fresh and independent view of organisational practices that, if left unchecked, are capable of impeding the incident learning process.

scholarly journals “Open” Category Unmanned Aerial Systems Harmonized Standards and Requirements Complex

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Andon Andonov
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Systems ◽  
Unmanned Systems ◽  
The Common ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Military ◽  
Aerial Systems

Abstract The steadily increasing use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) is an important factor for the military and civil aviation safety on a global scale. One of the critical conditions for the efficient functioning of the European aviation safety system is the establishment and implementation in practice of a comprehensive regulatory framework for the use of unmanned systems in the Common European Airspace. The aviation authorities and industry strive to introduce a set of rules and requirements that adequately and flexibly guarantee a high level of safety without limiting the development of the UAS market. This article proposes a set of standards that should be met by “Open” category UAS with the intention to execute operations in the European airspace.

Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Keselamatan Penerbangan di Bandar Udara SM. Badaruddin II Palembang

WARTA ARDHIA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-98
Author(s):  
Lita Yarlina ◽  
Evy Lindasari
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Aviation Safety ◽  
General Aviation ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
System Control ◽  
Safety Regulation

Safety is a major factor every flight. National aviation safety oversight is one of the functions that are the responsibility of coaching the Derectorate General of Civil Aviation to encure compliance with the standards, procedures and regulations, in order to see the fulfillment of the terms and condition in general aviation safety standards and safe operation of airports in particular that carried out by the organizers airports and other stakeholders. The method of analisys used to determine the operational supervision airport is gap analysis between the observation and collection of primary data from airport managers with operational safety performance indicator airport contained in KM, 24 2009 on Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 139 on the airport (aerodrome) issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. The analysis showed that the safety oversight of the airport operation in airport Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Palembang in the surveillance system consists of four systems which are airport management system, air side system control, the airport environment systems, inspection systems and reporting systems and safety management system has been appropriate and meets CASR 139.Pengawasan keselamatan penerbangan nasional merupakan salah satu fungsi pembinaan yang menjadi tanggung jawab Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara memastikan kesesuaian standar, prosedur dan peraturan terkait, guna melihat pemenuhan peraturan dan ketentuan standar dan keselamatan penerbangan pada umumnya dan keselamatan operasi bandar udara pada khususnya yang dilaksanakan oleh penyelenggara bandar udara dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya. Metode analisis yang digunakan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan pengawasan operasional bandar udara adalah metode analisis kesenjangan (gap analysis)antara hasil observasi dan pengumpulan data primer dari pengelola bandar udara dengan performance indicator keselamatan operasional bandar udara yang terdapat dalam KM. 24 Tahun 2001 tentang Peraturan Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil Bagian 139 (Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 139) tentang Bandar Udara (Aerodrome). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan keselamatan operasi Bandar udara di Bandar udara Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Palembang dalam sistem pengawasan terdiri dari 4 sistem yaitu sistem manajemen bandar udara, sistem control sisi udara, sistem lingkungan bandar udara, sistem pemeriksaan dan sistem pelaporan dan sistem Manajemen keselamatan sudah sesuai dan sudah memenuhi referensi CASR 139.

Civil Aviation Safety

1980 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 2-4
Author(s):  
WALTER TYE
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Civil Aviation

Civil Aviation Safety

1980 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 2-4
Author(s):  
WALTER TYE
Keyword(s):  
Aviation Safety ◽  
Civil Aviation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document