ATRIUM Combined Cycle Propulsion Flight Test Project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Richardson ◽  
Hiroaki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Sakamoto ◽  
Yusuke Maru ◽  
Shinichiro Tokudome ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Darli Vieira ◽  
Paulo Quattrocchi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Brian Kish ◽  
Gary Aldrich ◽  
Russell Erb ◽  
Sharlene Lim ◽  
Dan Carroll
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Rhys Hutchinson ◽  
Jeremy Lawrence ◽  
Keith F Joiner

Despite 50 years of technological advancement since the inception of Concorde, research on supersonic passenger aircraft has only recently resulted in design and flight test of several small 12 to 55-passenger business jets with supersonic cruises between Mach 1.2 and 2.2. Analytical research designs of larger 300-passenger aircraft have been conducted only to speeds of Mach 2.0 and 2.2, mainly avoiding moving beyond turbojet propulsion. This research extends on an earlier multifactor regression sizing study to determine in greater design detail whether the configuration of a 200-passenger Mach 3.0 aircraft is feasible using extant technology. This research article is the second part of two and covers a suitable and cost-effective propulsion system for the executive supersonic passenger aircraft. Through this high-speed design, the research examines modern propulsion technology and the performance advancements it affords through higher efficiencies, higher metallurgical thermal limits, variable cycle engines and variable stator technology. The analysis was conducted on several potential propulsion systems using GasTurb software to obtain engine performance data. The performance results led to a combined cycle turbofan–ramjet engine as being the engine that could yield the most extensive range for the aircraft. Further investigation is needed on aircraft noise, engine emissions, the accuracy of the thrust-critical lift-to-drag ratios and the aeroelastic effects that can be closely coupled to noise and performance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Darli Vieira ◽  
Paulo Quattrocchi
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHIFUMI INATANI ◽  
JUN'ICHIRO KAWAGUCHI ◽  
KOICHI YONEMOTO
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney C. Wingrove ◽  
Frederick G. Edwards ◽  
Armando E. Lopez
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Vontas Alfenny Nahan ◽  
Audrius Bagdanavicius ◽  
Andrew McMullan

In this study a new multi-generation system which generates power (electricity), thermal energy (heating and cooling) and ash for agricultural needs has been developed and analysed. The system consists of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) and an absorption chiller system. The system generates about 3.4 MW electricity, 4.9 MW of heat, 88 kW of cooling and 90 kg/h of ash. The multi-generation system has been modelled using Cycle Tempo and EES. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of this system had been conducted and exergy costs have been calculated. The exergoeconomic study shows that gasifier, combustor, and Heat Recovery Steam Generator are the main components where the total cost rates are the highest. Exergoeconomic variables such as relative cost difference (r) and exergoeconomic factor (f) have also been calculated. Exergoeconomic factor of evaporator, combustor and condenser are 1.3%, 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively, which is considered very low, indicates that the capital cost rates are much lower than the exergy destruction cost rates. It implies that the improvement of these components could be achieved by increasing the capital investment. The exergy cost of electricity produced in the gas turbine and steam turbine is 0.1050 £/kWh and 0.1627 £/kWh, respectively. The cost of ash is 0.0031 £/kg. In some Asian countries, such as Indonesia, ash could be used as fertilizer for agriculture. Heat exergy cost is 0.0619 £/kWh for gasifier and 0.3972 £/kWh for condenser in the BIGCC system. In the AC system, the exergy cost of the heat in the condenser and absorber is about 0.2956 £/kWh and 0.5636 £/kWh, respectively. The exergy cost of cooling in the AC system is 0.4706 £/kWh. This study shows that exergoeconomic analysis is powerful tool for assessing the costs of products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document