Optimizing Well Productivity by Controlling Acid Dissolution Pattern During Matrix Acidizing of Carbonate Reservoirs

Author(s):  
Frank Fakuen Chang ◽  
Mustaph Abbad
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus Palharini Schwalbert ◽  
Murtada Saleh Aljawad ◽  
Alfred Daniel Hill ◽  
Ding Zhu

1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 382-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Engelmann ◽  
P.E. Phillips ◽  
Daryl R. Tweeton ◽  
Kent W. Loest ◽  
Michael T. Nigbor

Abstract Sandstone formations contain a variety of minerals including carbonates, clays, feldspars, quartz, and, in some cases, valuable compounds of uranium, vanadium, and copper. When a reactive fluid such as acid is injected into these porous rocks to dissolve the minerals, their dissolution rates are different because of differences instructure and chemical composition. Consequently multiple reaction zones develop as a reactive fluid flows through the rock. This study, describing the movement of these reaction zones during sandstone matrix acidizing, also has application in hydrometallurgy and in-situacid leaching of minerals. Laboratory tests to predict the effects of acid injection usually are carried out by flowing acid through a coresample while permeability and fluid effluent concentration are monitored. If the minerals in a particular sample dissolve at approximately the same rate, a lumped parameter model satisfactorily describes the movement of a single reaction zone through the core. However, for the case of high temperatures, long cores, or long injection times, this model does not predict the effluent acid concentration correctly, and a distributed parameter model including the movement of multiple reaction zones is required. This paper describes the development of such a model and its verification by core flowexperiments. The study shows that when various minerals including quartz are being dissolved during matrix acidizing, larger acid volumes are required than predicted byprevious models. Introduction The dissolution of clays, feldspars, and other minerals ina sandstone can be achieved by the injection of mixtures of hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acid. Because of differences in chemical composition and structure, the acid dissolution rates of these minerals are different. As aresult, multiple reaction zones are developed as the acid flows through the porous sandstone. An earlier investigation demonstrated that if we assume that quartz dissolves so slowly in hydrochloric/hydrofluoric acid (mud acid) as to be considered unreactive and if the other minerals dissolve atapproximately the same rate, a lumped parameter model satisfactorily describes the movement of a single reaction front or zone. In this model, reactive minerals such as various clays and feldspars are lumped together and treated as a single dissolvable species. Carbonates are assumed dissolved in hydrochloric acid and are not involved in the hydrofluoric acid reaction. For high temperatures, long injection times, and long sandstone penetration distances (as in long test cores), this lumped parameter model does not predict correctly the changing acid concentration and the movement of multiple reactionzones during acid injection. A distributed parametermodel is necessary to describe the acid stimulation of sandstones when the difference in acid dissolution of the various minerals is taken into account. This paperdescribes the development of such a model. In addition, it shows how this model, coupled with the analysis of laboratory core flood experiments, predicts the radial movement of reaction zones and corresponding changesin the permeability during acid stimulation. Acidizing Linear Sandstone Cores Evaluation of the DissolutionParameters From Effluent Data Sandstone stimulation studies in the laboratory generallyare carried out by flowing hydrochloric/hydrofluoricacid mixtures at constant rate through cylindrical coresamples and monitoring the permeability changes and the effluent acid concentration. The lumped parameter model was developed to describe the movement of the acid reaction front through the core. SPEJ P. 99^


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T. Jones ◽  
C. Rodenboog ◽  
D.G. Hill ◽  
Anwar H. Akbar Ali ◽  
P. de Boer

SPE Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 559-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A.. A. Mahmoud ◽  
H.A.. A. Nasr-El-Din ◽  
C.A.. A. De Wolf ◽  
J.N.. N. LePage ◽  
J.H.. H. Bemelaar

Summary Matrix acidizing is used in carbonate formations to create wormholes that connect the formation to the wellbore. Hydrochloric acid (HCl), organic acids, or mixtures of these acids are typically used in matrix-acidizing treatments of carbonate reservoirs. However, the use of these acids in deep wells has some major drawbacks, including high and uncontrolled reaction rates and corrosion to well tubulars, especially those made of chromium-based tubulars (Cr-13 and duplex steel); and these problems become severe at high temperatures. To overcome problems associated with strong acids, chelating agents were introduced and used in the field. However, major concerns with most of these chemicals are their limited dissolving power and negative environmental impact. L-glutamic acid diacetic acid (GLDA), a newly developed environmentally friendly chelate, was examined as a replacement for acid treatments in deep oil and gas wells. The solubility of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in the new chelate was measured over a wide range of parameters. Coreflood tests were conducted using long Indiana limestone cores 1.5 in. in diameter and 20 in. in length, which allowed better understanding of the propagation of this chemical in carbonate rocks. The cores were X-ray scanned before and after the injection of chelate solutions into the cores. The concentration of calcium (Ca) and chelate was measured in the core effluent samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the fate and propagation of chelating agents in coreflood studies. GLDA has a very good ability to dissolve Ca from carbonate rocks over a wide pH range by a combination of acid dissolution and chelation. The addition of 5 wt% sodium chloride (NaCl) did not affect the GLDA performance at pH = 13 but significantly accelerated the reaction at pH = 1.7. Compared with other chelating agents, GLDA dissolved more Ca than ethanoldiglycinic acid (EDG) but less than hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA) at high pH values. GLDA of pH = 1.7 was able to form wormholes at 2 and 3 cm3/min. GLDA was found to be thermally stable at temperatures up to 350°F.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document