scholarly journals Rare Mucosal Lip Atypical Fibroxanthoma Treated with Mohs Micrographic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 664-666
Author(s):  
Tara Howard ◽  
Taraneh Matin ◽  
John Howard ◽  
Eduardo Weiss Howard

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare dermal neoplasm of low-intermediate malignant potential found almost exclusively in the non-mucosal regions of the head and neck in light-skinned elderly males who have a history of significant sun exposure. Due to its risk of misdiagnosis of more common skin lesions and possibility of metastases, AFX requires resection with either Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) or wide local excision (WLE). The purpose of this abstract is to discuss the best comprehensive treatment for a lower lip AFX using MMS versus WLE.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-172
Author(s):  
Timothy Nyckowski ◽  
Roger Ceilley ◽  
Andrew Bean

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare, dermal- based mesenchymal neoplasm. Clinically, these tumors are characterized by rapid, exophytic growth and epidermal ulceration.1 Despite striking clinical features and growth pattern, it is considered to be a tumor of low- to intermediate- malignant potential.1-3. We report a case of an 89 year old Caucasian male that had a 1 month history of a rapidly enlarging, pedunculated neoplasm on the scapha of his right ear. Histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of the lesion were consistent with atypical fibroxanthoma. After a biopsy, the patient underwent a complete resection with Mohs micrographic surgery and remains asymptomatic 6 months later. This 3.0 x 2.0 cm lesion emerged over a 4-5 week period, representing the most rapid growing AFX of the external ear reported in the literature.


Author(s):  
John B. Holds

Chemical peels, mechanical abrasion, and more recently laser and electrosurgical devices are used to resurface eyelid and facial skin. The common feature in these techniques is the denaturation or removal of the skin surface. These techniques typically help to hide skin changes related to sun exposure and aging by evening the skin tone, decreasing dyschromia, and diminishing wrinkles. These techniques all require careful case selection and patient preparation with appropriate treatment and postoperative care. Recent interest has focused on less invasive therapy with techniques that leave the epithelium largely intact, shortening healing time and reducing the risk of complications. Aging and sun damage induce a number of changes in skin, including wrinkling, the development of muscle- or gravity-related folds, irregular pigment or dyschromia, and the growth of benign and malignant skin lesions. Scars from acne, trauma, or surgery can also be indications for skin resurfacing. Potential benefit in all of these techniques must be balanced against risks and expected healing time. A medical history must be obtained, looking for a history of immune dysfunction, prior acne, or a history of herpes simplex outbreaks. Prior treatment with radiation or isotretinoin (Accutane) may diminish the pilosebaceous units required for healing. Acne rosacea and cutaneous telangiectasia may be aggravated by skin resurfacing. Cutaneous history must focus on scarring tendencies such as keloid formation, skin type, and ancestry. In particular, one must determine the patient’s skin type, most commonly by assigning a Fitzpatrick’s skin type. Patients with skin type III require careful topical preparation for skin resurfacing treatment in most cases, and patients with skin type IV or higher are more prone to scarring and pigment issues and are not treated with medium depth to deep skin resurfacing techniques by most clinicians. Wrinkles may be graded by the Glogau classification scheme. This scale from “fine wrinkles” (type 1) to “only wrinkles” (type IV) will help to define the amount and type of treatment needed. These loose recommendations will generally hold true in determining effective therapy. The deeper and more invasive the treatment, the more important the role of skin preparation and prophylaxis.


1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAIME L. DAVIS ◽  
HENRY W. RANDLE ◽  
MARK J. ZALLA ◽  
RANDALL K. ROENIGK ◽  
DAVID G. BRODLAND

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 929-934.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav N. Tolkachjov ◽  
Benjamin F. Kelley ◽  
Fares Alahdab ◽  
Patricia J. Erwin ◽  
Jerry D. Brewer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
David Chapireau ◽  
Saqib J. Bashir ◽  
Kathleen Fan

As part of the holistic approach to their patients, General Dental Practitioners are well placed to identify common skin lesions. Awareness and recognition of worrying lesions allow timely and appropriate referrals for further investigation and treatment. In this paper, we review benign, premalignant and malignant skin lesions, as well as genetic skin conditions. Past medical, family and social history (including sun exposure and previous cutaneous malignancy) is important. Examination includes the lesion, the skin type and the regional lymph nodes. The different common lesions are described, and the epidemiology, clinical features and treatment are discussed. Screening for skin lesions on the head and neck may be undertaken as part of overall dental care as part of the holistic examination of patients. Particularly with precancerous lesions and skin cancer, an early detection and referral from a dentist can expedite treatment and improve prognosis.


Author(s):  
Poonam Marwah ◽  
Ashish Marwah ◽  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Kumar

Background: To assess the incidence and profile of neonatal dermatoses in a tertiary care hospital of Haryana and study its association with various perinatal risk factors.Methods: All inborn neonates (<28 days of life) including those seen in the outpatient department on follow up between November 2016 to April 2017 formed the baseline population and babies with skin lesions were included in the study. A detailed perinatal history and newborn examination of the baby was done by a pediatrician and all relevant details were recorded. Data was analyzed, and inferences were drawn using tables.Results: In our study, a total of 2760 newborn (1506 (54.6%) males and 1254 (45.4%) females) were studied. The incidence of neonatal dermatoses was found to be 94.1%. There were 1849 (66.9%) term, 853 (30.9%) preterm, and 58 (2.1%) post term neonates. 1901 (68.8%) had birth weight >2.5kg while 859 (31.1%) had birth weight ≤2.5kg. 1223 (44.3%) were born to primipara while 1537 (55.6%) were born to multipara mothers. Mothers of 54 (1.9%) neonates were < 20 years of age; 1157 (41.9%) in the age group of 20-25 years; 1324 (47.9%) in the age group of 25-30 years and 225 (8.1%) in the age group >30 years. 1806 (65.4%) neonates were born by normal vaginal delivery and 954 (34.6%) neonates were born by cesarean section. In 13 (0.5%) neonates, history of consanguinity was present while it was absent in 2747 (99.5%) neonates. Most common skin lesions observed were transient skin lesions among which Mongolian spots (62.9%), epstein pearls (48.8%), erythema toxicum (41.8%), milia (40.6%) and miniature puberty (35.9%) were the most common.Conclusions: Incidence of neonatal dermatoses was found to be higher (54.6%) among males as compared to females (45.4%); among term babies; those with birth weight >2.5kg; those born to multipara mothers; those born via normal vaginal delivery and those with maternal age 25-30 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document