Abstract
A recent study showed that longevity based on different culling reasons should be considered as different traits in genetic evaluations. However, it is still necessary to create a pipeline that avoid including/excluding animals culled for different reasons in every genetic evaluation run. This study aimed to: 1) perform a genetic evaluation of the longevity of cows culled due to fertility-related problems including records of animals culled for other reasons (i.e., age, structural problems, disease, and performance) as censored records; and, 2) identify the impact of censored data in the genetic parameters and breeding values estimated. Two longevity indicators were evaluated: traditional (TL; time from first calving to culling) and functional (FL; time period in which the cow was alive and also calving after its first calving) longevity. Both TL and FL were evaluated from 2 to 15 years-old, and codified as binary traits for each age (0 = culled and 1 = alive/calved). Both trait definitions were analyzed using a Bayesian random regression linear model. Animals culled for reasons other than fertility were either excluded from the data (standard) or had their records censored after the culling date reported in the dataset (censored). After the quality control, 154,419 and 450,124 animals had uncensored and censored records, respectively. Heritabilities estimated for TL over the ages ranged from 0.02 to 0.13 for standard, and from 0.01 to 0.12 for censored datasets. Heritabilities estimated for FL ranged from 0.01 to 0.14 (standard), and from 0.01 to 0.13 (censored). Average (SD) correlation of breeding values predicted over all ages, using the standard and censored datasets, was 0.77 (0.16) for TL, and 0.83 (0.11) for FL. Our findings suggest that including censored data in the analyses might impact the genomic evaluations and further work is need to determine the optimal predictive approach.
Genetic evaluation of growth traits in beef cattle using random regression models