Predicting breeding values for milk yield of Guzerá (Bos indicus) cows using random regression models

2014 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J.A. Santos ◽  
M.G.C.D. Peixoto ◽  
R.R. Aspilcueta Borquis ◽  
J.C.C. Panetto ◽  
L. El Faro ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Pereira ◽  
A.B. Bignardi ◽  
L. El Faro ◽  
R.S. Verneque ◽  
A.E. Vercesi Filho ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Veerkamp ◽  
S. Brotherstone ◽  
B. Engel ◽  
T. H. E. Meuwissen

AbstractCensoring of records is a problem in the prediction of breeding values for longevity, because breeding values are required before actual lifespan is known. In this study we investigated the use of random regression models to analyse survival data, because this method combines some of the advantages of a multitrait approach and the more sophisticated proportional hazards models. A model was derived for the binary representation of survival data and links with proportional hazards models and generalized linear models are shown. Variance components and breeding values were predicted using a linear approximation, including time-dependent fixed effects and random regression coefficients. Production records in lactations 1 to 5 were available on 24741 cows in the UK, all having had the opportunity to survive five lactations. The random regression model contained a linear regression on milk yield within herd (no. = 1417) by lactation number (no. = 4), Holstein percentage and year-month of calving effect (no. = 72). The additive animal genetic effects were modelled using orthogonal polynomials of order 1 to 4 with random coefficients and the error terms were fitted for each lactation separately, either correlated or not. Variance components from the full (i.e. uncensored) data set, were used to predict breeding values for survival in each lactation from both uncensored and randomly censored data. In the uncensored data, estimates of heritabilities for culling probability in each lactation ranged from 0·02 to 0·04. Breeding values for lifespan (calculated from the survival breeding values) had a range of 2·4 to 3·6 lactations and a standard deviation of 0·25. Correlations between predicted breeding values for 129 bulls, each with more than 30 daughters, from the various data sets ranged from 0·81 to 0·99 and were insensitive to the model used. It is concluded that random regression analysis models used for test-day records analysis of milk yield, might also be of use in the analysis of censored survival data.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J.A. Santos ◽  
M.G.C.D. Peixoto ◽  
R.R. Aspilcueta Borquis ◽  
R.S. Verneque ◽  
J.C.C. Panetto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rodrigo Junqueira Pereira ◽  
Denise Rocha Ayres ◽  
Mário Luiz Santana Junior ◽  
Lenira El Faro ◽  
Aníbal Eugênio Vercesi Filho ◽  
...  

Abstract: The objective of this work was to compare genetic evaluations of milk yield in the Gir breed, in terms of breeding values and their accuracy, using a random regression model applied to test-day records or the traditional model (TM) applied to estimates of 305-day milk yield, as well as to predict genetic trends for parameters of interest. A total of 10,576 first lactations, corresponding to 81,135 test-day (TD) records, were used. Rank correlations between the breeding values (EBVs) predicted with the two models were 0.96. The percentage of animals selected in common was 67 or 82%, respectively, when 1 or 5% of bulls were chosen, according to EBVs from random regression model (RRM) or TM genetic evaluations. Average gains in accuracy of 2.7, 3.0, and 2.6% were observed for all animals, cows with yield record, and bulls (sires of cows with yield record), respectively, when the RRM was used. The mean annual genetic gain for 305-day milk yield was 56 kg after 1993. However, lower increases in the average EBVs were observed for the second regression coefficient, related to persistency. The RRM applied to TD records is efficient for the genetic evaluation of milk yield in the Gir dairy breed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 150 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Bignardi ◽  
L. El Faro ◽  
M.L. Santana ◽  
G.J.M. Rosa ◽  
V.L. Cardoso ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1848-1856
Author(s):  
Alessandro Haiduck Padilha ◽  
◽  
Jaime Araujo Cobuci ◽  
Darlene dos Santos Daltro ◽  
José Braccini Neto

Abstract The objective of this work was to verify the gain in reliability of estimated breeding values (EBVs), when random regression models are applied instead of conventional 305-day lactation models, using fat and protein yield records of Brazilian Holstein cattle for future genetic evaluations. Data set contained 262,426 test-day fat and protein yield records, and 30,228 fat and protein lactation records at 305 days from first lactation. Single trait random regression models using Legendre polynomials and single trait lactation models were applied. Heritability for 305-day yield from lactation models was 0.24 (fat) and 0.17 (protein), and from random regression models was 0.20 (fat) and 0.21 (protein). Spearman correlations of EBVs, between lactation models and random regression models, for 305-day yield, ranged from 0.86 to 0.97 and 0.86 to 0.98 (bulls), and from 0.80 to 0.89 and 0.81 to 0.86 (cows), for fat and protein, respectively. Average increase in reliability of EBVs for 305-day yield of bulls ranged from 2 to 16% (fat) and from 4 to 26% (protein), and average reliability of cows ranged from 24 to 38% (fat and protein), which is higher than in the lactation models. Random regression models using Legendre polynomials will improve genetic evaluations of Brazilian Holstein cattle due to the reliability increase of EBVs, in comparison with 305-day lactation models.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 505-516
Author(s):  
A.-E. Bugislaus ◽  
R. Roehe ◽  
H. Uphaus ◽  
E. Kalm

Abstract. The objective of this study was to develop new statistical models for genetic estimation of racing performances in German thoroughbreds. Analysed performance traits were "square root of rank at finish", "square root of distance to first placed horse in a race" and "log of earnings". These traits were found to be influenced by the carried weight, which was determined by the horse's earlier performance. Therefore, new traits were developed based on random regression models, which were independent from the carried weights. Heritabilities were first estimated for these created traits "new rank at finish" (h2 = 0.101) and "new distance to first placed horse in a race" (h2 = 0.142) by using two univariate animal models. When considering a linear regression of carried weights as fixed effect in the statistical model, heritabilities for "square root of rank at finish" (h2 = 0.086) and "square root of distance to first placed horse in a race" (h2 = 0.124) decreased. Breeding values of “new rank at finish” and "new distance to first placed horse in a race" were compared with breeding values of "square root of rank at finish" and "square root of distance to first placed horse in a race", in which carried weight was considered as fixed regression in the model. These two different models were compared by two criteria. Breeding values were overestimated for low performing thoroughbreds and underestimated for high performing horses when considering a linear regression of carried weights as fixed effect in the model. Statistical models considering new created traits ("new rank at finish" and "new distance to first placed horse in a race") which were independent of carried weights, showed better suitability for genetic estimation. Due to high genetic correlation with other traits and showing highest genetic variance a univariate animal model for the trait “new distance to first placed horse in a race” was recommended for genetic estimation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annaiza Braga Bignardi ◽  
Lenira El Faro ◽  
Vera Lucia Cardoso ◽  
Paulo Fernando Machado ◽  
Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Hinayah R Oliveira ◽  
Stephen P Miller ◽  
Luiz F Brito ◽  
Flavio S Schenkel

Abstract A recent study showed that longevity based on different culling reasons should be considered as different traits in genetic evaluations. However, it is still necessary to create a pipeline that avoid including/excluding animals culled for different reasons in every genetic evaluation run. This study aimed to: 1) perform a genetic evaluation of the longevity of cows culled due to fertility-related problems including records of animals culled for other reasons (i.e., age, structural problems, disease, and performance) as censored records; and, 2) identify the impact of censored data in the genetic parameters and breeding values estimated. Two longevity indicators were evaluated: traditional (TL; time from first calving to culling) and functional (FL; time period in which the cow was alive and also calving after its first calving) longevity. Both TL and FL were evaluated from 2 to 15 years-old, and codified as binary traits for each age (0 = culled and 1 = alive/calved). Both trait definitions were analyzed using a Bayesian random regression linear model. Animals culled for reasons other than fertility were either excluded from the data (standard) or had their records censored after the culling date reported in the dataset (censored). After the quality control, 154,419 and 450,124 animals had uncensored and censored records, respectively. Heritabilities estimated for TL over the ages ranged from 0.02 to 0.13 for standard, and from 0.01 to 0.12 for censored datasets. Heritabilities estimated for FL ranged from 0.01 to 0.14 (standard), and from 0.01 to 0.13 (censored). Average (SD) correlation of breeding values predicted over all ages, using the standard and censored datasets, was 0.77 (0.16) for TL, and 0.83 (0.11) for FL. Our findings suggest that including censored data in the analyses might impact the genomic evaluations and further work is need to determine the optimal predictive approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document