WASPTM and WASPLabTM fully automated disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST): from streaking to interpretation

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Navarria
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion

Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing for clinical and epidemiologic purposes

1985 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 241-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald R. Graham ◽  
Richard E. Dixon ◽  
James M. Hughes ◽  
Clyde Thornsberry
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion

scholarly journals Evaluation of an Automated System for Reading and Interpreting Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Fastidious Bacteria

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e0159183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeny A. Idelevich ◽  
Karsten Becker ◽  
Janne Schmitz ◽  
Dennis Knaack ◽  
Georg Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Disk Diffusion

scholarly journals Comparative performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Rampacci ◽  
Michele Trotta ◽  
Caterina Fani ◽  
Serenella Silvestri ◽  
Valentina Stefanetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius ◽  
Cutaneous Infections ◽  
Vitek 2

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the primary cause of canine cutaneous infections and sporadically isolated as pathogen from humans. Rapidly emerging antibiotic-resistant strains are creating serious health concern so that accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial for patient care. Here, the performances of AST methods Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion (DD) and Broth Microdilution (BMD) were compared for the determination of susceptibility of 79 S. pseudintermedius isolates from canine cutaneous infections and one from human pyoderma to oxacillin (OXA), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), gentamicin (GEN), enrofloxacin (ENR), doxycycline (DOX), clindamycin (CLI), inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), mupirocin (MUP) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Overall, the agreement of DD and Vitek-2 using veterinary AST-GP80 card with reference BMD was ≥ 90%, suggesting reliable AST performances. While DD generated mainly minor errors and one major error for OXA, Vitek-2 produced one very major error for GEN and it failed in identifying one ICR-positive isolate. Moreover, five bacteria were diagnosed as ICR-positive by Vitek-2 but they showed a non-induction resistance phenotype by manual methods. All S. pseudintermedius were interpreted as susceptible or intermediately susceptible to DOX using CLSI breakpoints for human staphylococci that match the DOX concentration range included in AST-GP80. However, this could lead to inappropriate antimicrobial prescription for S. pseudintermedius infections in companion animals. Considering the clinical and epidemiological importance of S. pseudintermedius , we encourage updating action by the system manufacturer to address AST for this bacterium.

scholarly journals Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison of Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01649-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paul Morris ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Tsigedera Tekle ◽  
John A. Fissel ◽  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Alternative Approach

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of cefiderocol poses challenges because of its unique mechanism of action (i.e., requiring an iron-depleted state) and due to differences in interpretative criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Our objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for AST of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol AST was performed on consecutive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; 58 isolates) and non-glucose-fermenting GNB (50 isolates) by BMD (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and DD (30 μg; research-use-only [RUO] MASTDISCS and FDA-cleared HardyDisks). Results were interpreted using FDA (prior to 28 September 2020 update), EUCAST, and investigational CLSI breakpoints (BPs). Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were calculated for DD methods. The susceptibilities of all isolates by BMD were 72% (FDA), 75% (EUCAST) and 90% (CLSI). For DD methods, EUCAST BPs demonstrated lower susceptibility at 65% and 66%, compared to 74% and 72% (FDA) and 87% and 89% (CLSI) by HardyDisks and MASTDISCS, respectively. CA ranged from 75% to 90%, with 8 to 25% mE, 0 to 19% ME, and 0 to 20% VME and varied based on disk, GNB, and BPs evaluated. Both DD methods performed poorly for Acinetobacter baumannii complex. There is considerable variability when cefiderocol ASTs are interpreted using CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints. DD offers a convenient alternative approach to BMD methods for cefiderocol AST, with the exception of A. baumannii complex isolates.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of 59 Strains of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1847-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Tremblay ◽  
Christiane Gaudreau
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Complete Agreement ◽  
Campylobacter Fetus ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Fetus Subsp

The susceptibilities of 59 Campylobacter fetus subsp.fetus isolates to eight antibiotics were studied by the agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods. None of the isolates were β-lactamase producers. All were susceptible to ampicillin, gentamicin, imipenem, and meropenem as determined by the three methods, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC90s) (determined by agar dilution) of 2, 1, ≤0.06, and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively. Twenty-seven percent of the isolates were resistant to tetracycline, with complete agreement between the agar dilution and disk diffusion results. The MIC90s determined by agar dilution were 2 μg/ml for erythromycin, 1 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 8 μg/ml for cefotaxime.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document