Blood pressure analysis on surgical and ICU patients receiving vasopressor therapy

Author(s):  
Alexandre Joosten
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. e41
Author(s):  
Ricardo Adrian Nugraha ◽  
Michael Jonatan ◽  
Pranawa Martosuwignjo ◽  
Sri Murtiwi

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1313-1322
Author(s):  
S. Fadlilah ◽  
A. Sucipto

Background: Blood pressure is influenced by psychosocial (stress), genetic, age, gender, nutritional status, and lifestyle (diet, lack of fiber consumption, smoking, lack of physical activity). 30 ml of young coconut water contains 61 mg of potassium, 5.45 mg of sodium, and 1.3 mg of sugar, affecting blood pressure changes. Coconut water contains K minerals and is useful for lowering blood pressure. Whereaswatermelon contains anti-hypertensive content, namely sodium, beta carotene, and potassium. Watermelon is rich in water, amino acids, L-arginine, which can maintain healthy blood pressure. Aim: This study aims to determine the effect of young coconut water and watermelon juice on blood pressure in the 2013 nursing students of Respati University Yogyakarta. Methods: This type of research is a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group pre and post-test. The sample was taken by simple random sampling, namely the control group (18 respondents), the young coconut water group (18 respondents), and papaya juice (18 respondents). Data pre-posttest of each group was tested using Paired T-test. The comparison control-treatment group was tested using an independent-test. Results: The mean differences of systole and diastole pre-posttest blood pressure in the control group were -1.8 mmHg and -1.0 mmHg. The mean difference in systole blood pressure and the pre-posttest diastole of young coconut water groups were -3.1mmHg and -2.4 mmHg. The mean systole and diastole blood pressure in the pre-posttest watermelon juice group were -2.9 mmHg and -1.5 mmHg. The pre-posttest results of systole and diastole blood pressure analysis in the p-value control group were 0.100 and 0.450. The pre-post test results of systole and diastole blood pressure analysis of young coconut water groups gained p-value of 0.030 and 0.194. The pre-post test results of the juice watermelon group's systole and diastole blood pressure analysis gained p-value of 0.032 and 0.181. The posttest results of systole and diastole blood pressure analysis in the control group and young coconut water gained p-value of 0.014 and 0.157. The post-test results of the systole and diastole blood pressure analysis control group and juice watermelon gained p-value of 0.013 and 0.420. Conclusion: Consumption of young coconut water and watermelon juice affects systole blood pressure, but it does not affect diastole blood pressure in nursing students in 2013 in Respati University Yogyakarta. Keyword: Blood pressure, Coconut Water, Watermelon Juice


2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Ju Sung ◽  
Jacob Basson ◽  
Nuo Cheng ◽  
Khanh-Dung H. Nguyen ◽  
Priyanka Nandakumar ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Myny ◽  
J De Waele ◽  
T Defloor ◽  
S Blot ◽  
F Colardyn

Background and Aims: Temperature measurement is a routine task of patient care, with considerable clinical impact, especially in the ICU. This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and variability of the Temporal Artery Thermometer (TAT) in ICU-patients. Therefore, a convenience sample of 57 adult patients, with indwelling pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) in a 40-bed intensive care unit in a university teaching hospital was used. Methods: The study design was a prospective, descriptive comparative analysis. Body temperature was thereby measured simultaneously with the TAT and the Axillary Thermometer (AT), and was compared with the temperature recording of the PAC. The use of vasoactive medication was recorded. Results and conclusions: Mean temperature of all measurements was: PAC: 37.1°C (SD: 0.87), TAT: 37.0°C (SD: 0.68) and axillary thermometer: 36.6°C (SD: 0.94). The measurements of the TAT and the PAC were not significantly different (mean difference: 0.14°C; SD: 0.51; p= 0.33); whereas the measurements of the PAC and the AT differed significantly (mean difference: 0.46°C; SD: 0.39; p< 0.001). Mean difference in PAC versus TAT analyses, between patients with vasopressor therapy (0.12°C; SD: 0.55), and without vasopressor therapy (0.19°C; SD: 0.48) was not statistically significant (p= 0.47). Conclusion: We can conclude that the temporal scanner has a relatively good reliability with an acceptable accuracy and variability in patients with normothermia. The results are comparable to those of the AT, but they do not seem to be sufficient to prove any substantial benefit compared to rectal, oral or bladder thermometry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Lamontagne ◽  
Andrew G. Day ◽  
Maureen O. Meade ◽  
Deborah J. Cook ◽  
Gordon H. Guyatt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document