Blood pressure targets: comparing lower versus standard targets for people with hypertension

In this commentary, Hamer, Hill and Harrison critically appraise a systematic review comparing lower versus standard targeted blood pressure and how this impacts morbidity and mortality in people with hypertension.

Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease

Epidemiological studies have documented that insulin resistance and diabetes not only constitute metabolic abnormalities but also predispose to hypertension, vascular stiffness, and associated cardiovascular disease. Meanwhile, excessive arterial stiffness and impaired vasorelaxation, in turn, contribute to worsening insulin resistance and the development of diabetes. Molecular mechanisms promoting hypertension in diabetes include inappropriate activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system, mitochondria dysfunction, excessive oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation. This review highlights recent studies which have uncovered new underlying mechanisms for the increased propensity for the development of hypertension in association with diabetes. These include enhanced activation of epithelial sodium channels, alterations in extracellular vesicles and their microRNAs, abnormal gut microbiota, and increased renal sodium-glucose cotransporter activity, which collectively predispose to hypertension in association with diabetes. This review also covers socioeconomic factors and currently recommended blood pressure targets and related treatment strategies in diabetic patients with hypertension.

Risk factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure among patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in Vietnam

Background: Uncontrolled blood pressure rates are high in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease, worsening the disease progression and leading to end-stage renal disease. However, studies on uncontrolled blood pressure in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease and its associated factors in Vietnam are scarce. Objectives: This study aimed at identifying uncontrolled blood pressure rates and risk factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure among Vietnamese patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Results: 63.2% of the participants could not control their BP less than 130/80 mmHg. Poor sleep quality (OR 2.076, 95%CI 1.059-4.073, p=.034) and severe comorbidities (OR 2.926, 95%CI 1.248-6.858, p=.013) were risk factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure among Vietnamese patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, the study found a high rate of awareness toward the importance of blood pressure control but a low rate of known blood pressure targets. Conclusion: Uncontrolled blood pressure rates among Vietnamese patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease were high. Sleep quality and comorbidity severity were significantly associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in this population. To achieve blood pressure targets, nurses and other healthcare providers should pay more attention to the patients with poor sleep quality and severe comorbidities. Funding: The “2018 Mahidol Postgraduate Scholarship”.

Should Vasopressors Be Started Early in Septic Shock?

Sepsis can influence blood volume, its distribution, vascular tone, and cardiac function. Persistent hypotension or the need for vasopressors after volume resuscitation is part of the definition of septic shock. Since increased positive fluid balance has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in sepsis, timing of vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock seems crucial. However, conclusive evidence on timing and sequence of interventions with the goal to restore tissue perfusion is lacking. The aim of this narrative review is to depict the pathophysiology of hypotension in sepsis, evaluate how common interventions to treat hypotension interfere with physiology, and to give a resume of the results from clinical studies focusing on targets and timing of vasopressor in sepsis. The majority of studies comparing early versus late administration of vasopressors in septic shock are rather small, single-center, and retrospective. The range of “early” is between 1 and 12 hours. The available studies suggest a mean arterial pressure of 60 to 65 mm Hg as a threshold for increased risk of morbidity and mortality, whereas higher blood pressure targets do not seem to add further benefits. The data, albeit mostly from observational studies, speak for combining vasopressors with fluids rather “early” in the treatment of septic shock (within a 0–3-hour window). Nevertheless, the optimal resuscitation strategy should take into account the source of infection, the pathophysiology, the time and clinical course preceding the diagnosis of sepsis, and also comorbidities and sepsis-induced organ dysfunction.

Blood Pressure Management After Endovascular Thrombectomy

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has changed the landscape of acute stroke therapy and has become the standard of care for selected patients presenting with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Despite successful reperfusion, many patients with LVO stroke do not regain functional independence. Particularly, patients presenting with extremes of blood pressure (BP) or hemodynamic variability are found to have a worse clinical recovery, suggesting blood pressure optimization as a potential neuroprotective strategy. Current guidelines acknowledge the lack of randomized trials to evaluate the optimal hemodynamic management during the immediate post-stroke period. Following reperfusion, lower blood pressure targets may be warranted to prevent reperfusion injury and promote penumbral recovery, but adequate BP targets adjusted to individual patient factors such as degree of reperfusion, infarct size, and overall hemodynamic status remain undefined. This narrative review outlines the physiological mechanisms of BP control after EVT and summarizes key observational studies and clinical trials evaluating post-EVT BP targets. It also discusses novel treatment strategies and areas of future research that could aid in the determination of the optimal post-EVT blood pressure.

The Distance Monitoring of Blood Pressure as a Tool for Improving of the Quality of Follow-Up Observation of Patients with Arterial Hypertension

This article focuses on the distant blood pressure monitoring for patients with arterial hypertension. As numerous studies show, even slightly elevated blood pressure significantly raises the risk of cardiovascular complications. And, vice versa, a 5 mmHg decrease in blood pressure reduces the lethality risk. Therefore, it is not enough to prescribe the right medication but also it is of paramount importance to monitor patients’ compliance with the treatment. Clinical observation of patients with arterial hypertension is an effective tool for the prevention of cardiovascular complications. However, to date, the coverage of follow-up and the achievement of blood pressure targets in patients with arterial hypertension is one of the most problematic aspects. Distance monitoring of blood pressure opens more opportunities for the doctor’s involvement, timely assessment and adjustment of the medication. The results of domestic and foreign research show high efficacy of the distance blood pressure monitoring. Positive results regarding the achievement of target blood pressure after 3 months are shown when using the technology of blood pressure monitoring and distance counseling of patients with arterial hypertension. In particular, the article considers the technology of mobile health care (mHealth), which is a more flexible platform for a patient’s continuous self-care.

Effect of electroencephalography-guided anesthesia on neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A trial protocol The POEGEA trial (POncd Elderly GEneral Anesthesia)

Introduction The number of elderly patients undergoing major surgery is rapidly increasing. They are particularly at risk of developing postoperative neurocognitive disorders (NCD). Earlier studies suggested that processed electroencephalographic (EEG) monitors may reduce the incidence of postoperative NCD. However, none of these studies controlled for intraoperative nociception levels or personalized blood pressure targets. Their results remain unclear if the reduction in the incidence of postoperative NCD relates to avoidance of any electroencephalographic pattern suggesting excessive anesthesia depth. Objective The objective of this trial is to investigate–in patients ≥ 70 years old undergoing major non-cardiac surgery–the effect of EEG-guided anesthesia on postoperative NCD while controlling for intraoperative nociception, personalized blood pressure targets, and using detailed information provided by the EEG monitor (including burst suppression ratio, density spectral array, and raw EEG waveform). Material and methods This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will be conducted in a single Canadian university hospital. Patients ≥ 70 years old undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery will be included in the trial. The administration of sevoflurane will be adjusted to maintain a BIS index value between 40 and 60, to keep a Suppression Ratio (SR) at 0%, to keep a direct EEG display without any suppression time and a spectrogram with most of the EEG wave frequency within the alpha, theta, and delta frequencies in the EEG-guided group. In the control group, sevoflurane will be administered to achieve an age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration of [0.8–1.2]. In both groups, a nociception monitor will guide intraoperative opioid administration, individual blood pressure targets will be used, and cerebral oximetry used to tailor intraoperative hemodynamic management. The primary endpoint will be the incidence of NCD at postoperative day 1, as evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary endpoints will include the incidence of postoperative NCD at different time points and the evaluation of cognitive trajectories up to 90 days after surgery among EEG-guided and control groups. Study registration NCT04825847 on ClinicalTrials.gov.