Wrist Circumference as a Marker for Abdominal Obesity Correlates with Waist Circumference, Independent of Diabetes

Author(s):  
Salomi Shaikh
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1687-1687
Author(s):  
Annabelle Shaffer ◽  
Mindy Lee ◽  
Catherine Applegate ◽  
Nouf Alfouzan ◽  
John Erdman ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives There is a clear link between abdominal obesity and chronic diseases. Dietary changes leading to substantial weight loss reduce obesity and improve health; however, no viable dietary treatment program exists that produces clinically significant, cost-effective, and sustainable weight loss. To test the hypothesis that a diet dense in lean proteins and fiber is inversely associated with abdominal obesity while maintaining skeletal muscle mass (SMM), we evaluated the correlation between mean protein and fiber density and changes in BMI, waist circumference and SMM during weight loss. Methods Thirty adult males and females participated in this ongoing, 2-year dietary weight loss program. The Individualized Dietary Improvement Program focused on reducing caloric intake and increasing protein (7–11 g/100 kcal) and fiber (1.8–3.2 g/100 kcal) density to desired ranges. Participants attended 19 group educational sessions, 3 individual counseling appointments, self-weighed daily, and submitted monthly 24-hour dietary recalls. BMI, waist circumference and body composition (InBody) measurements were collected at baseline and after 6 months. Results At 6 months, 25 participants (24–70y) remained in the study with 18 completing all body measurements. Mean weight loss (n = 25) was −2.2 ± 0.5 BMI points (–5.2 ± 1.3% of initial body weight) and mean waist circumference reduction (n = 18) was −6.5 ± 1.3 cm from baseline. Significant increases in protein and fiber density were seen from baseline to month 2 (P < 0.05). There were direct inverse associations between mean protein density and both reduced waist circumference (P < 0.01) and reduced BMI (P < 0.01). Fiber intake had no significant impact on weight loss, and maintenance of SMM did not significantly correlate with mean protein density. However, only 11.0 ± 3.2% of weight lost was due to the loss of SMM, supporting the efficacy of the program. A significant positive correlation (P < 0.01) existed between fat mass loss and protein density, with 74.3 ± 4.7% of excess body fat accounting for total weight lost. Conclusions Increased protein density correlates with accelerated loss of fat mass, greater reductions in abdominal adiposity, and may protect SMM from degradation during weight loss. Funding Sources This research is supported by the NIBIB of the NIH and the USDA NIFA.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-783
Author(s):  
Carine FRÖHLICH ◽  
Raquel CANUTO ◽  
Anderson da Silva GARCEZ ◽  
Marcos Pascoal PATTUSSI ◽  
Ruth Liane HENN ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate factors that are associated with type 2 diabetes Mellitus in shift workers of a slaughterhouse in Southern Brazil. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1,194 18- to 50-year-old workers of both sexes. The presence of type 2 diabetes Mellitus was self-reported and confirmed by the use of hypoglycemic drugs or insulin. The independent variables were sex, age, skin color, marital status, education level, family income, leisure time physical activity, smoking, and self-reported health and nutritional status (body mass index and waist circumference). Multivariate analysis was performed from an a priori conceptual model. Results: The prevalence of diabetes was 1.3% (95%CI=0.6-1.9). Type 2 diabetes Mellitus was associated with poor or regular self-reported health (OR)=3.72; 95%CI=1.28-10.78) and level II abdominal obesity ³102 for men and ³88 for women (OR=5.76; 95%CI=1.07-29.10). Conclusion: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes Mellitus was low. Moreover, the study evidenced the importance of using waist circumference to surveil and screen for metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes Mellitus, and to monitor the low quality of life in the study individuals given the poor self-perceived health of workers with the said disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ygor Hermenegildo-López ◽  
Helena Sandoval-Insausti ◽  
Carolina Donat-Vargas ◽  
Jose Ramón Banegas ◽  
Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives to examine the association of general and abdominal obesity with falls, falls requiring medical care and falls with fractures in older women. Design a population-based prospective cohort of 1,185 women aged ≥60 in Spain, followed up from 2008 to 2010 through 2012. Measures weight, height and waist circumference were measured at baseline using standardised techniques. Participants were classified according to body mass index as normal weight (<25), overweight (25–29.9) and general obesity (≥30). Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference >88 cm. In 2012, participants reported the falls experienced in the previous year. Logistic regression models were mutually adjusted for general and abdominal obesity and for main confounders. Results in this cohort of older women, a total of 336 women experienced falls, 168 of them had falls requiring medical care and 64 falls with fractures. For falls, no association was found with general obesity nor abdominal obesity. However, compared with normal weight, overweight women had a decreased risk for falls requiring medical care [odds ratio (OR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.94] and for falls with fractures (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12–0.63). The corresponding values for general obesity were 0.44 (0.24–0.81) and 0.30 (0.11–0.82). Abdominal obesity was positively associated with falls requiring medical care (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.12–2.94) and falls with fractures (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.18–6.44). Conclusions in older women, general obesity may protect from falls requiring medical care and falls with fractures. On the contrary, abdominal obesity increased the risk of suffering from types of falls.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Uutela ◽  
H Kautiainen ◽  
S Järvenpää ◽  
S Salomaa ◽  
M Hakala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document