scholarly journals Clearing the Prophet’s Ijtihād from error: تنزيه اجتهاد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم عن الغلط

Author(s):  
Abdulhadi Mohammad Dalati Abdulhadi Mohammad Dalati

There is no doubt that the Prophetic traditions (sunnah) are amongst the foundations upon which Muslims base their Islamic beliefs. They are also one of the pillars that high-ranking scholars rely upon in order to derive religious maxims/rules. In this era, many misconceptions surfaced in regards to the credibility of the Prophetic Sunnah. Through these misunderstandings, numerous people have attempted to prevent others from being committed to the Sunnah and implementing its noble teachings. Perhaps, also, some contemporaries might have referred to certain claims, in some books, which indicate to the possibility of error in the Ijtihād of the Prophet regarding religious matters. This has consequently resulted in repelling people from committing to the Prophetic traditions. Based upon this, through my research, I will attempt to investigate in this matter so as to clarify that the reality is contrary to their claims. Instead, the Prophet, ṣalla-Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam, is impeccable and protected from erring when performing Ijtihād as he is protected from making mistakes in regards to what he relates from His Lord through revelation. I have collated many supportive evidences as well as making note of the misrepresentations I have found and responded to them. Amongst the conclusions this research has arrived at is that when Jesus descends from the sky, all disagreements pertaining to judicial schools of thought will cease, because his Ijtihād is protected from error, therefore his religious opinion would be the accepted one. The methodologies I adopted herein are descriptive & analytical. I hope that this research becomes a new addition to the Islamic body of research and an aid to researchers. I also hope for this research project to fill the gap in extant research, as I have not found anyone who has delved into this matter as I have.

Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Willis ◽  
Hennie Boeije

Based on the experiences of three research groups using and evaluating the Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF), we draw conclusions about the utility of the CIRF as a guide to creating cognitive testing reports. Authors generally found the CIRF checklist to be usable, and that it led to a more complete description of key steps involved. However, despite the explicit direction by the CIRF to include a full explanation of major steps and features (e.g., research objectives and research design), the three cognitive testing reports tended to simply state what was done, without further justification. Authors varied in their judgments concerning whether the CIRF requires the appropriate level of detail. Overall, we believe that current cognitive interviewing practice will benefit from including, within cognitive testing reports, the 10 categories of information specified by the CIRF. Future use of the CIRF may serve to direct the overall research project from the start, and to further the goal of evaluation of specific cognitive interviewing procedures.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Olson ◽  
Leonard Jason ◽  
Joseph R. Ferrari ◽  
Leon Venable ◽  
Bertel F. Williams ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Bergo ◽  
Annalisa Anni ◽  
Roberta Cascarilla ◽  
Romina Spina ◽  
Eleonora Capovilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document