Besoins perçus et adaptation des démarches d’enseignement: le cas de l’enseignement des sciences et technologies au secondaire

Cet article traite de l’adaptation des démarches d’enseignement en cours d’action, adoptées par les enseignants des sciences et technologies de l’école secondaire. Il vise à comprendre les processus dynamiques de l’adaptation de l’enseignement. Il s’appuie sur des données qui ont été obtenues grâce à un protocole de recherche qualitative axé sur des techniques de groupes de réflexion. Les résultats de la recherche mettent en évidence l’hétérogénéité des parcours d’adaptation des enseignants. Ils soulignent la nécessité du professionnalisme de l’enseignant des sciences et technologies. Ils suggèrent de prendre en considération la complexité des besoins d’adaptation. Ceux-ci commandent en définitive la compatibilité entre les démarches de l’enseignant et les besoins de ses élèves. Le processus d’adaptation est aussi guidé par le plaisir de la reconnaissance, les rapports de l’enseignant aux savoirs, de même que par la défense des valeurs collectives.Mots clé: adaptation de l’enseignement, perception des besoins, enseignement des sciences et technologies This article deals with the adjustment of teaching approaches made by high school science and technology teachers while teaching. It aims at achieving a better understanding of the dynamic processes of teaching adjustment. It relies on a qualitative methodology using focus groups. Data analysis shows the multiplicity of ways that teachers use to adjust their teaching. It stresses out the importance of science and technology teachers’ professionalism and suggests taking into account the complexity of teacher and student needs in the equation of teaching adjustment. Those needs call for an increased compatibility between teaching approaches and students’ needs. The adjustment of teaching approaches is also related to the quest for recognition, the teacher relationship with knowledge and the collective values in place. Keywords: Teaching adjustment, students and teachers needs, science and technology teaching

Download Full-text

The Development of Collaborative Learning Cell Based on Brain-Based Learning (BBL)Model for The Junior High School Science Learning in The Agroecosystem Area

BIOEDUKASI ◽

10.19184/bioedu.v17i2.14999 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 82

Author(s):

Ari Dwi Setya Laksana ◽

Jekti Prihatin ◽

Ika Lia Novenda

Keyword(s):

High School ◽

Data Analysis ◽

Collaborative Learning ◽

Junior High School ◽

Science Learning ◽

Junior High ◽

School Science ◽

Student Response ◽

High School Science ◽

Brain Based Learning

Agroecosystem plays an important role in the national economy. However, the role of agroecosystem in education in the form of teaching and learning has not been used optimally. It is less in providing opportunities for students to develop their mindset based on their abilities so that the students do not understand the potential requiring the surrounding area. Learning models that can provide opportunities for students to develop are suitable with the 2013 curriculum. Modification of collaborative learning Cells with Brain-Based Learning (BBL LC) model makes the learning appropriate for the 2013 curriculum. The purpose is to obtain a valid, effective, and practical model which is suitable for the junior high school science learning in the agroecosystem area. The research type is development research (R & D) by using the 4-D model but, only use three stages; Define, Design, and Develop stages without using Disseminate stage. This research was conducted at Junior High School 7 Jember. The data collection techniques were filling out the validation sheet, interview, observation, test, and documentation. The data analysis techniques include data analysis from the validation results, model analysis, and model effectiveness analysis. The model validity was the average results of the product validation (85.81%) in a very valid category. The model effectiveness was the average of¬N-gain learning outcomes (0.53) and students' problem-solving skill questionnaires (75.87% ) in a good category. The model practicality was from the teacher and student response questionnaires with an average of about 92.94% and 94% which belongs to a very practical category.

Download Full-text