PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING VERSUS DYNAMIC HIP SCREW  IN MANAGEMENT OF STABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMUR  FRACTURES: A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL  OUTCOMES

Background: Intertrochanteric femur fractures account half of the hip fractures in elderly, the other majority being neck of femur fracture. 35-40% of intertrochanteric are unstable (Tronzo’s classification type 3, 4 and 5). The dynamic hip screw (DHS) has achieved widespread acclaim in the last few years and is currently considered to be the standard device for outcome assessment. Though, the DHS has been shown to produce good results, but complications are frequent, particularly in unstable inter-trochanteric fracture. The advantage of Proximal Femur Nailing fixation is that it provides a more biomechanically stable construct by reducing the distance between hip joint and implant. The goal of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographical outcomes of the DHS (load bearing implant) and PFN (load sharing implant) for the treatment of Intertrochanteric hip fractures.Methods: We assessed the same in 52 cases of unstable femur fracture 26 operated with DHS and 26 with PFN and followed up with sequential radiographs for radiological union and sequential interview with Harris hip score calculation for functional outcome assessment.Results: Patients operated for unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture with Proximal femoral nailing had better Harris hip scores (excellent 4, good 14) compared to dynamic hip screw group (Excellent 6, good 5) and earlier weight bearing (At 18 weeks, 100% in PFN compared to 65.5% in DHS). PFN has lesser incidence of postoperative complications (15% in PFN compared to 38% in DHS).Conclusions:The proximal femoral nail has better functional outcome in terms of Harris hip score and early radiologic union in unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur.

Download Full-text

Comparative functional analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated with dynamic hip screw with that of proximal femoral nailing

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences ◽

10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i4f.58 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 3 (4f) ◽

pp. 418-421

Author(s):

Dr. Makesh Ram S ◽

Dr. Anand A ◽

Dr. Kathir Azhagan S

Keyword(s):

Functional Analysis ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Femoral Nailing ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Proximal Femoral Nailing

Download Full-text

Proximal Femoral Nailing vs. Dynamic Hip Screw in unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur – a comparative analysis

International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research ◽

10.7439/ijbar.v7i10.3682 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 7 (10) ◽

pp. 489

Author(s):

Mohammad Faisal ◽

Prithviraj Nistane

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Femoral Nailing ◽

Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Proximal Femoral Nailing

Download Full-text

Comparative study between dynamic hip screw and plate with proximal femoral nailing in trochanteric fractures of femur

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20171909 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

pp. 602

Author(s):

M. K. Nizamoddin Khateeb ◽

Satish Babu D. G.

Keyword(s):

Early Mobilization ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Sliding Hip Screw ◽

Medical College ◽

Femoral Nailing ◽

Hip Screw ◽

One Year ◽

Proximal Femoral Nailing

Background: Incidence of intertrochanteric fractures has increased significantly during recent years and it will probably continue to rise in near future due to increased longevity of life. Closed methods of treatment for intertrochanteric fractures have increased mortality rates & have largely been abandoned. Rigid internal fixation and early mobilization has been the standard protocol of treatment nowadays. This study was intended to compare the results of Intertrochanteric fractures treated by dynamic hip screw (DHS) over proximal femoral nailing (PFN).Methods: This is a randomized prospective study of 102 cases of intertrochanteric fractures, admitted to Mysore Medical College & Hospital, Mysore and ESIC medical college and hospital Kalaburagi and Kamareddy Ortho & Trauma care Hospital Kalaburagi; treated with proximal femoral nailing and DHS. The patients were divided randomly into two groups, each of 51 patients, 51 were treated by Dynamic Hip Screw & 51 were treated with proximal femoral nail (PFN).All patients were followed up for one year.Results: In our series of 102 patients of Intertrochanteric fractures, 51 were treated with sliding hip screw with plate and 51 were treated by an intra-medullary hip screw. Most of the patients were between 51 to 80 years. Slip and trivial fall accounted for 70% cases. Right side was more common accounted for 58.34% of cases. Conclusions: From our study, we consider PFN as better alternative to DHS in more unstable fractures with technically difficulty and require more experience. Sliding hip screw remains the implant of choice for stable type fractures. We noticed less operative time, less blood loss, fewer intra-op complications in PFN group. The quality of the reduction achieved & proper positioning of the implant are important to achieve the best post-operative outcome.

Download Full-text

Comparative study of dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nailing in the management of intertrochanteric fracture femur

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences ◽

10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i4b.2319 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 69-72

Author(s):

Dr. Kanakachalapathi ◽

Dr. Subhash Patil

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Fracture Femur ◽

Femoral Nailing ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Proximal Femoral Nailing

Download Full-text

A comparative study on the functional outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by proximal femoral nailing or dynamic hip screw fixation

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20205559 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 51

Author(s):

Gineshmon Chandy ◽

Saju S.

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcome ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Femoral Nailing ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Group 2 ◽

Proximal Femoral Nailing ◽

Radiological Union ◽

Unstable Fractures

Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the commonly occurring injuries in elderly patients and are high among females and those with osteoporosis. They were treated with either dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or proximal femoral nailing (PFNA2) here at our institution. The study was conducted in order to find which method of surgical fixation has better functional outcome. Methods: Total 96 patients of intertrochanteric fractures admitted during the study period of November 2017 to April 2019 were included for the study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups; DHS was used as implant in group1 and PFNA2 in group 2. Postoperatively patients were followed up after 1 month, 3months and 6 months of the surgery and were assessed using Harris hip score.Results: Harris hip score was higher with PFNA2 group compared to DHS group in all follow-ups. In unstable fractures DHS group had poor outcome compared to PFNA2. Radiological union occurred in 27.1 % cases by 3 months and 72.9% cases by 6 months with DHS whereas 70.8% and 97.9% respectively with PFNA2. Conclusions: PFNA2 gives a better functional outcome when compared to DHS. Even though DHS gives good functional outcome in stable fractures it is not so in the case of unstable fractures. The radiological union also is faster with proximal femoral nailing. Hence in our opinion PFNA2 can be the better fixation device compared to DHS especially in unstable fractures.

Download Full-text