scholarly journals Adding to Relevant Restricted Quantification

Author(s):  
Jc Beall

This paper presents, in a more general setting, a simple approach to ‘relevant restricted generalizations’ advanced in previous work. After reviewing some desiderata for restricted generalizations, I present the target route towards achieving the desiderata. An objection to the approach, due to David Ripley, is presented, followed by three brief replies, one from a dialetheic perspective and the others more general.

Author(s):  
E. A. Kenik ◽  
J. Bentley

Cliff and Lorimer (1) have proposed a simple approach to thin foil x-ray analy sis based on the ratio of x-ray peak intensities. However, there are several experimental pitfalls which must be recognized in obtaining the desired x-ray intensities. Undesirable x-ray induced fluorescence of the specimen can result from various mechanisms and leads to x-ray intensities not characteristic of electron excitation and further results in incorrect intensity ratios.In measuring the x-ray intensity ratio for NiAl as a function of foil thickness, Zaluzec and Fraser (2) found the ratio was not constant for thicknesses where absorption could be neglected. They demonstrated that this effect originated from x-ray induced fluorescence by blocking the beam with lead foil. The primary x-rays arise in the illumination system and result in varying intensity ratios and a finite x-ray spectrum even when the specimen is not intercepting the electron beam, an ‘in-hole’ spectrum. We have developed a second technique for detecting x-ray induced fluorescence based on the magnitude of the ‘in-hole’ spectrum with different filament emission currents and condenser apertures.


2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-403
Author(s):  
Richard B. Makover

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongjin Yang ◽  
Keli Han ◽  
Marat Molyboga ◽  
Georgiy Molyboga

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhakar Rairala ◽  
Bandi Yadagiri ◽  
Rajashaker Bantu ◽  
Vijayacharan Guguloth ◽  
Lingaiah Nagarapu

Author(s):  
Kris McDaniel

This chapter develops a version of ontological pluralism that appeals to semantically primitive restricted quantification and naturalness. It also articulate different ways of formulating versions of ontological pluralism. Although the author defends ontological pluralism from some objections, the main goals of this chapter are to get some versions of ontological pluralism on the table, show that they are intelligible and worthy of consideration, and show how concerns about ontological pluralism connect up with historical and contemporary meta-metaphysical issues. The chapter considers versions of ontological pluralism that say that substances have a different mode of being than attributes, that things in time have a different mode of being than atemporal objects, that stuff has a different mode of being than things, and many others.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050061
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Guerrieri

Let [Formula: see text] be a regular local ring of dimension [Formula: see text]. A local monoidal transform of [Formula: see text] is a ring of the form [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a regular parameter, [Formula: see text] is a regular prime ideal of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is a maximal ideal of [Formula: see text] lying over [Formula: see text] In this paper, we study some features of the rings [Formula: see text] obtained as infinite directed union of iterated local monoidal transforms of [Formula: see text]. In order to study when these rings are GCD domains, we also provide results in the more general setting of directed unions of GCD domains.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (16) ◽  
pp. 20554-20564
Author(s):  
Le Thi Bao Ngoc ◽  
Tran Anh Tu ◽  
Luu Thi Thanh Hien ◽  
Duong Nhat Linh ◽  
Nguyen Tri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document