scholarly journals The China-NZ FTA and Waxing Juridical

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Ruiping Ye ◽  
Ricarda Kesebohm
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Legal Personality

This article considers the translation of legal personality and the use of the word juridical in the China-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement.

scholarly journals INDONESIA'S POSITION BASED ON THE AUSTRALIAN ASEAN NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND ITS IMPACT FROM A BUSINESS LAW PERSPECTIVE

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Ariawan Gunadi
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
South East Asia ◽  
Business Law ◽  
Business Partner ◽  
The West ◽  
Brunei Darussalam ◽  
The World

AbstractIndonesia as one of the major countries in South East Asia acts as aprominent business center between the East and the West. Business activitiessoon attract the attention of other countries in similar geography to share thewealth such as Malaysia, Filipina, Myanmar, Cambodia, Singapore,Vietnam, Thai/and, Laos, Myanmar and Brunei Darussalam. However, theinternational society would have to face the import taxes that impedesf oreign goods from flowing into state member' market. Australia and NewZealand as a fellow business partner then proposes the Australian AseanNew Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) to the Association of SouthEast Asian Nations (ASEAN) that allows members to conduct free tradeamong them in almost every sector, including goods, services, investment,intellectual property and new issues (Singapore Issues). However theagreement is suspected by some parties to condone a subtle form of liberaleconomy that may allow Australia and New Zealand to influence the nationaleconomy of the weaker state, not mentioning endangering ASEAN'bargaining position in the World Trade Organization. This article attemptsto explain the position of Indonesia 's economic sovereignty by signing theAANZFTA which imposes several clauses affecting the economic activity andhow will the agreement bring impact to Indonesia 's national economy offrom a business law perspective.

scholarly journals Delving into the Fog of Ambiguity: An Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership's Data Exclusivity Provisions and their Implications for Access to Medicines in New Zealand

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Christopher Smith Diaz
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Access To Medicines ◽  
Data Exclusivity ◽  
Corporate Profits ◽  
Stimulation Of

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a multilateral free-trade agreement which New Zealand became a party to in 2016. This article focuses on the inconsistencies that arise between the language of the TPP and New Zealand law, with respect to data exclusivity regimes. Compliance with the TPP seems to entail an extension to the terms of data exclusivity for both biologics and small-molecule pharmaceuticals. This may have the effect of impeding access to medicines by delaying the entry of competition into the market. In particular the underlying rationale behind the biologic data exclusivity provisions appears to be the protection of American corporate profits rather than the stimulation of innovation or the long-term improvement of access to healthcare. As a result, these provisions are not in New Zealand's interest and if implemented into law they may be economically detrimental. 

scholarly journals Cơ hội, thách thức từ cam kết cắt giảm thuế quan trong hiệp định đối tác kinh tế toàn diện khu vực (RCEP) đối với hoạt động kinh doanh một số sản phẩm của Tập đoàn Dầu khí Việt Nam

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 33-40
Author(s):  
Nghiem Thi Ngoan ◽  
Pham Ba Nam ◽  
Nguyen Thi Ngoc ◽  
To Minh Hieu ◽  
Dao Minh Phuong
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Viet Nam ◽  
Economic Partnership ◽  
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership

Hiệp định đối tác kinh tế toàn diện khu vực (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership - RCEP) được ký kết ngày 15/11/2020, sau 8 năm đàm phán, là Hiệp định thương mại tự do (Free Trade Agreement - FTA) lớn nhất thế giới với sự tham gia của 10 nước thành viên ASEAN và 5 quốc gia gồm: Australia, Trung Quốc, Nhật Bản, Hàn Quốc và New Zealand. Đến cuối lộ trình, giai đoạn năm 2035 - 2040, Việt Nam sẽ xóa bỏ thuế quan với khoảng 85,6 - 89,6% số dòng thuế với các nước đối tác và các nước đối tác xóa bỏ thuế quan cho Việt Nam trong khoảng 90,7 - 92% số dòng thuế. Bài báo so sánh thuế nhập khẩu của Việt Nam và thuế nhập khẩu của các nước (trong RCEP) từ Việt Nam và so sánh với biểu thuế của các FTA mà Việt Nam đã tham gia trực tiếp hoặc thông qua ASEAN đối với các sản phẩm chính của Tập đoàn Dầu khí Việt Nam (PVN) và các đơn vị thành viên gồm: xăng dầu, LPG, polypropylene (PP), urea, NPK, xơ, sợi. Từ đó, nhận diện cơ hội và thách thức trong hoạt động kinh doanh các sản phẩm này khi tham gia vào Hiệp định RCEP.

Breaking the South-South FTA Mould: Why China ‘Went OECD’ with New Zealand?

China Report ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-441
Author(s):  
Fernando M. Schmidt Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreements ◽  
Middle Ground ◽  
The South

China and New Zealand were able to sign a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in 2008, in spite of the large differences in standards under which they were respectively negotiating trade agreements in the international arena. This article starts with a descriptive analysis of these differences between each country’s standards in terms of FTA quality. With the description of these standards, which seem to stand on opposite sides of a continuum, we examine why China and New Zealand decided to forego the standards under which they had negotiated previous agreements in order to find a middle ground. This process of convergence showcases how the interests of both parties moved them towards the adoption of a middle ground which enabled them to negotiate a win-win agreement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document