ICAR5: design and validation of a 5-item public domain cognitive ability test

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard ◽  
Julius D. Bjerrekær
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Ability Test

A Multimedia Situational Test With a Constructed-Response Format

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke K. Oostrom ◽  
Marise Ph. Born ◽  
Alec W. Serlie ◽  
Henk T. van der Molen
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Computer Technology ◽  
Psychology Students ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Constructed Response ◽  
Job Experience ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Situational Test

Advances in computer technology have created opportunities for the development of a multimedia situational test in which responses are filmed with a webcam. This paper examined the relationship of a so-called webcam test with personality, cognitive ability, job experience, and academic performance. Data were collected among 153 psychology students. In line with our expectations, scores on the webcam test, intended to measure interpersonally oriented leadership, were related to extraversion, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and job experience. Furthermore, the webcam tests significantly predicted students’ learning activities during group meetings over and above a cognitive ability test and a personality questionnaire. Overall, this study demonstrates that webcam tests can be a valid complement to traditional predictors in selection contexts.

Range shrinkage of cognitive ability test scores in applicant pools

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas W. B. Lang ◽  
Martin Kersting ◽  
Ute R. Hulsheger
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Ability Test

Cognitive Ability Test

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Lievens ◽  
Paul R. Sackett ◽  
Tine Buyse
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Ability Test

Evaluating a Computerized Adaptive Testing Version of a Cognitive Ability Test Using a Simulation Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110277
Author(s):  
Ioannis Tsaousis ◽  
Georgios D. Sideridis ◽  
Hannan M. AlGhamdi
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Adaptive Testing ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Item Pool ◽  
Sequential Approach ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Item Exposure

This study evaluated the psychometric quality of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the general cognitive ability test (GCAT), using a simulation study protocol put forth by Han, K. T. (2018a). For the needs of the analysis, three different sets of items were generated, providing an item pool of 165 items. Before evaluating the efficiency of the GCAT, all items in the final item pool were linked (equated), following a sequential approach. Data were generated using a standard normal for 10,000 virtual individuals ( M = 0 and SD = 1). Using the measure’s 165-item bank, the ability value (θ) for each participant was estimated. maximum Fisher information (MFI) and maximum likelihood estimation with fences (MLEF) were used as item selection and score estimation methods, respectively. For item exposure control, the fade away method (FAM) was preferred. The termination criterion involved a minimum SE ≤ 0.33. The study revealed that the average number of items administered for 10,000 participants was 15. Moreover, the precision level in estimating the participant’s ability score was very high, as demonstrated by the CBIAS, CMAE, and CRMSE). It is concluded that the CAT version of the test is a promising alternative to administering the corresponding full-length measure since it reduces the number of administered items, prevents high rates of item exposure, and provides accurate scores with minimum measurement error.

Fathers of children conceived using ART have higher cognitive ability scores than fathers of naturally conceived children

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1461-1468
Author(s):  
Bernt Bratsberg ◽  
Ole Rogeberg ◽  
Vegard Skirbekk
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Birth Cohort ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Paternal Age ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Birth Cohorts ◽  
Male Birth ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Military Conscription

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does paternal cognitive ability differ for children conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER Young fathers of ART conceived children tend to score cognitively below their same-age natural conception (NC) counterparts and older (above 35) fathers of ART conceived children tend to score above. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Cognitive ability is a genetically and socially transmitted trait, and If ART and NC children have parents with different levels of this trait, then this would in itself predict systematic differences in child cognitive outcomes. Research comparing cognitive outcomes of children with different modes of conception finds conflicting results, and studies may be influenced by selection and confounding. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a population-based study based on Norwegian data, combining information from the Medical Birth Registry (births through 2012), military conscription tests (birth cohorts 1955–1977) and the population registry. These data allow us to compare the cognitive ability scores of men registered as the father of an ART-conceived child to the cognitive abilities of other fathers and to average scores in the paternal birth cohorts. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS The population level study included 18 566 births after ART (5810 after ICSI, 12 756 after IVF), and 1 048 138 NC births. It included all Norwegian men who received a cognitive ability score after attending military conscription between 1973 and 1995. This constituted 614 827 men (89.4% of the male birth cohorts involved). An additional 77 650 unscored males were included in sensitivity analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Paternal cognitive level was assessed using intelligence quotients (IQ) converted from stanine scores on a three-part cognitive ability test with items measuring numeracy, vocabulary and abstract thought (Raven-like matrices). ART fathers averaged 1.95 IQ points above the average of their own birth cohort (P-value < 0.0005) and 1.83 IQ points above NC fathers in their own birth cohort (P < 0.0005). Comparisons of the IQ of ART fathers to those of NC fathers of similar age and whose children were born in the same year, however, found average scores to be more similar (point estimate 0.24, P = 0.023). These low average differences were found to differ substantially by age of fatherhood, with young ART fathers scoring below their NC counterparts and older ART fathers scoring above their NC counterparts. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We do not have information on maternal cognition. We also lack information on unsuccessful infertility treatments that did not result in a live birth. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Paternal cognitive ability of ART children differs from that of NC children, and this difference varies systematically with paternal age at child birth. Selection effects into ART may help explain differences between ART and NC children and need to be adequately controlled for when assessing causal effects of ART treatment on child outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research has also been supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262700 (Centre for Fertility and Health). It has also been supported by the Research Council of Norway’s Project 236992 (Egalitarianism under pressure? New perspectives on inequality and social cohesion). There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

The Development and Validation of an Online Spatial Network Measure

Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1914-1927
Author(s):  
Bao Sheng Loe
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Ability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Spatial Network ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Brain Functions ◽  
Planning Ability ◽  
Item Response Theory Analysis ◽  
Potential Applications

Planning is an essential cognitive process of executive functions and is considered as one of the most important brain functions. Planning has been extensively studied in the field of neuropsychology, but there is a lack of computerized assessment tools of planning ability that are easily accessible to researchers and clinicians. The present study aims to validate a newly developed online spatial network test that is designed for both clinical and nonclinical populations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional factorial structure with moderate to high internal consistency in the test. Two-parameter logistic item response theory analysis showed acceptable item and model fit and no violation of the local independence assumption. The overall success rate exhibited a positive correlation with the performance of planning before attempting to solve the items. After correcting for attenuation, moderate to high correlations were found between the spatial network test and the International Cognitive Ability Resource 16 short form cognitive ability test and the automated perceptual maze test, respectively, demonstrating convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity. Future directions and potential applications of the spatial network test as an assessment tool to measure planning for researchers and clinicians are discussed in the end.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document