scholarly journals Electronic real-time surveillance for influenza-like illness: experience from the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in Denmark

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
K M Harder ◽  
P H Andersen ◽  
I Bæhr ◽  
L P Nielsen ◽  
S Ethelberg ◽  
...  

To enhance surveillance for influenza-like illness (ILI) in Denmark, a year-round electronic reporting system was established in collaboration with the Danish medical on-call service (DMOS). In order to achieve real-time surveillance of ILI, a checkbox for ILI was inserted in the electronic health record and a system for daily transfer of data to the national surveillance centre was implemented. The weekly number of all consultations in DMOS was around 60,000, and activity of ILI peaked in week 46 of 2009 when 9.5% of 73,723 consultations were classified as ILI. The incidence of ILI reached a maximum on 16 November 2009 for individuals between five and 24 years of age, followed by peaks in children under five years, adults aged between 25 and 64 years and on 27 November in senior citizens (65 years old or older). In addition to the established influenza surveillance system, this novel system was useful because it was timelier than the sentinel surveillance system and allowed for a detailed situational analysis including subgroup analysis on a daily basis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phunlerd Piyaraj ◽  
Nira Pet-hoi ◽  
Chaiyos Kunanusont ◽  
Supanee Sangiamsak ◽  
Somsak Wankijcharoen ◽  
...  

Objective: We describe the Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Surveillance System (BDMS-SS) and use of surveillance efforts for influenza as an example of surveillance capability in near real-time among a network of 20 hospitals in the Bangkok Dusit Medical Services group (BDMS).Introduction: Influenza is one of the significant causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit of laboratory surveillance and its capability to accurately detect influenza outbreaks earlier than syndromic surveillance.1-3 Current laboratory surveillance has an approximately 4-week lag due to laboratory test turn-around time, data collection and data analysis. As part of strengthening influenza virus surveillance in response to the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, the real-time laboratory-based influenza surveillance system, the Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Surveillance System (BDMS-SS), was developed in 2010 by the Bangkok Health Research Center (BHRC). The primary objective of the BDMS-SS is to alert relevant stakeholders on the incidence trends of the influenza virus. Type-specific results along with patient demographic and geographic information were available to physicians and uploaded for public health awareness within 24 hours after patient nasopharyngeal swab was collected. This system advances early warning and supports better decision making during infectious disease events.2 The BDMS-SS operates all year round collecting results of all routinely tested respiratory clinical samples from participating hospitals from the largest group of private hospitals in Thailand.Methods: The BDMS has a comprehensive network of laboratory, epidemiologic, and early warning surveillance systems which represents the largest body of information from private hospitals across Thailand. Hospitals and clinical laboratories have deployed automatic reporting mechanisms since 2010 and have effectively improved timeliness of laboratory data reporting. In April 2017, the capacity of near real-time influenza surveillance in BDMS was found to have a demonstrated and sustainable capability.Results: From October 2010 to April 2017, a total of 482,789 subjects were tested and 86,110 (17.8%) cases of influenza were identified. Of those who tested positive for influenza they were aged <2 years old (4.6%), 2-4 year old (10.9%), 5-14 years old (29.8%), 15-49 years old (41.9%), 50-64 years old (8.3%) and >65 years old (3.7%). Approximately 50% of subjects were male and female. Of these, 40,552 (47.0%) were influenza type B, 31,412 (36.4%) were influenza A unspecified subtype, 6,181 (7.2%) were influenza A H1N1, 4,001 (4.6%) were influenza A H3N2, 3,835 (4.4%) were influenza A seasonal and 196 (0.4%) were respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).The number of influenza-positive specimens reported by the real-time influenza surveillance system were from week 40, 2015 to week 39, 2016. A total of 117,867 subjects were tested and 17,572 (14.91%) cases tested positive for the influenza virus (Figure 1). Based on the long-term monitoring of collected information, this system can delineate the epidemiologic pattern of circulating viruses in near real-time manner, which clearly shows annual peaks in winter dominated by influenza subtype B in 2015-1016 season. This surveillance system helps to provide near real-time reporting, enabling rapid implementation of control measures for influenza outbreaks.Conclusions: This surveillance system was the first real-time, daily reporting surveillance system to report on the largest data base of private hospitals in Thailand and provides timely reports and feedback to all stakeholders. It provides an important supplement to the routine influenza surveillance system in Thailand. This illustrates a high level of awareness and willingness among the BDMS hospital network to report emerging infectious diseases, and highlights the robust and sensitive nature of BDMS’s surveillance system. This system demonstrates the flexibility of the surveillance systems in BDMS to evaluate to emerging infectious disease and major communicable diseases. Through participation in the Thailand influenza surveillance network, BDMS can more actively collaborate with national counterparts and use its expertise to strengthen global and regional surveillance capacity in Southeast Asia, in order to secure advances for a world safe and secure from infectious disease. Furthermore, this system can be quickly adapted and used to monitor future influenzas pandemics and other major outbreaks of respiratory infectious disease, including novel pathogens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Eamchotchawalit ◽  
P Piyaraj ◽  
P Narongdej ◽  
S Charoensakulchai ◽  
C Chanthowong

Abstract Background Although recent efforts from some Asian countries to describe burden of influenza disease and seasonality, these data are missing for the vast majority, including the private section of Thailand. A near real-time laboratory-based influenza surveillance system, in a network of 40 hospitals was implemented aiming to determine influenza strains circulating in the private hospitals of Thailand and know characteristics, trend and burden of influenza viruses. Methods We obtained the data by monitoring patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) at a network of 40 private hospitals across Thailand. Throat-swab specimens in viral transport media were collected and transported within 24 h of collection using a cold-chain system. The respiratory samples were tested by rapid influenza diagnostic tests and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results From January 2010 to November 2019, a total of 1,300,594 subjects were tested and 320,499 cases of influenza were identified. Of those positive cases, 116,317(36.3%) were influenza type B, 185,512(57.9%) were influenza A unspecified subtype, 8,833(2.7%) were influenza A(H1N1)pdm2009 and 6,371(1.9%) were seasonal influenza A(H3N2). Positive rate were 50.5 and 49.5 in female and male. Positivity rate was 41.4% in persons 15-49 years followed by 29.1% in 15-14 years, 17.6% in under five children and 11.7% in &gt; 49 years. In 2018-2019 season, the highest positivity rate observed in February and March (39.3%) followed by April (34.2%) and January (32.3%) while the lowest positivity rate was in May (18.1%). Conclusions In Thailand, seasonal Influenza A(H3N2), Influenza A(H1N1)pdm2009 and Influenza B viruses were circulating during 2010-2019. In last season, positivity rate and number of cases peaked in February and March. Key messages Influenza is one of public health problems in Thailand. The need to introduce influenza vaccine and antivirus is important to prevent and treat the disease in future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (42) ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Fielding ◽  
N Higgins ◽  
J E Gregory ◽  
K A Grant ◽  
M G Catton ◽  
...  

Victoria was the first Australian state to report widespread transmission of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza. Notifiable laboratory-confirmed influenza and a general practitioner sentinel surveillance system measuring influenza-like illness (ILI), including laboratory confirmation of influenza as the cause of ILI, were used to assess the pandemic. The pandemic influenza A(H1N1)v virus quickly became the dominant circulating strain and notification rates were highest in children and young adults. Despite a high number of notified cases, comparison of ILI rates suggested the season peaked in late June, was similar in magnitude to 2003 and 2007 and less severe than 1997. The majority of clinical presentations were mild, but one quarter of hospitalised cases required admission to intensive care. Given the low proportion of imported cases in the Victorian pandemic, the rapid increase in cases with no travel history and the low median age of cases notified during the phases of intense surveillance, we suggest there may have been silent importations of pandemic virus into Victoria before the first case was recognised. The usefulness of a general practitioner sentinel surveillance system to provide a comparable assessment of influenza and ILI activity over time was clearly demonstrated, and the need for similar hospital and mortality surveillance systems for influenza in Victoria was highlighted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (31) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gutiérrez ◽  
A Litzroth ◽  
S Hammadi ◽  
H Van Oyen ◽  
C Gérard ◽  
...  

On 6 July 2009 the Belgian enhanced surveillance system for influenza-like illness among travellers returning from influenza A(H1N1)v affected areas detected a case linked to a rock festival which took place on 2-5 July. The health authorities implemented communication and control measures leading to the detection of aditional cases. This paper describes the outbreak and its impact on the management of the influenza pandemic in Belgium.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (28) ◽  
Author(s):  
Collective Belgian working group on influenza A(H1N1)v

In response to the ongoing influenza A(H1N1)v pandemic, first detected in North America in April 2009, Belgium has set up an active surveillance system for influenza-like illness among travellers returning from affected areas. This communication describes the clinical and epidemiological features of the first 43 laboratory-confirmed cases in Belgium.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Sominina ◽  
E. A. Smorodintseva ◽  
K. A. Stolyarov ◽  
A. A. Mel'nikova

Existing influenza surveillance system is constantly improved to obtain comprehensive information for understanding of continuously changing situation with the influenza, which is a consequence of the highest variability of the pathogen, its ability to reassortment and the imminence of emergence a new shift-variants of the virus that could cause the next pandemic events. For this purpose, since the 2010 - 2011 epidemic season, in addition to the traditional surveillance system (TS) a new well standardized sentinel surveillance system (SS) for rapid clinical and epidemiological data obtaining was introduced in Russia. A total 7812 hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) and 9854 outpatients with influenza-like illness and acute respiratory infection (ILI/ARI) were investigated during the 6-year period in SS. Percent of SARI among all hospitalized patients ranged from 1.7 to 3.1%; about 5.3 - 7.5% SARI patients were placed in the Intensive Care Unit. Etiological monitoring using PCR showed influenza spread trends in SS similar to those registered in the TS: a clear predominance of influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 among SARI and ILI/ARI in 2010 - 2011 and 2015 - 2016 epidemic seasons, influenza A (H3N2) in the epidemic seasons 2011 - 2012 and 2014 - 2015, the co-circulation of these pathogens in 2012 - 2013, 2013 - 2014 seasons in Russia. SARI caused by influenza B virus were detected less frequently than influenza A but increased influenza B activity was registered in the epidemic of 2014 -2015, when Yamagata lineage changed suddenly for the Victorian one. The average frequency of influenza diagnosis among SARI between the seasons varied in the range 12.5 - 27.1%, at the peak of the epidemic it reached 44.8 - 73.5% and was the highest during the season with active circulation of influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus. The rate of influenza diagnosis among ILI/ARI has always been lower than that among SARI. Studies have also shown the importance of rhinovirus, RS-virus and parainfluenza infections in SARI development. The frequency of registration of coronaviruses, metapneumovirus and bocavirus infection was very low in SARI and ILI/ARI. It was found that in all studied seasons most of SARI patients with influenza have not been vaccinated. Among ILI/ARI outpatients with influenza, the frequency of vaccinated individuals for the entire period of the study was estimated as 10.1%, which was 4.2 times higher than that in SARI, where only 2.4% of patients were vaccinated. In addition, it was found that for all six seasons the SARI patients with influenza were treated with antivirals drugs 2 times less often compared to outpatients. Analysis of data on concomitant diseases and conditions in SARI patients with influenza confirmed the leading role of pregnancy as a risk factor for hospitalization in all influenza epidemics, irrespective of their etiology. In addition, diabetes and cardiovascular disease were recognized as risk factors for influenza associated SARI development.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211881829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hana Apsari Pawestri ◽  
Arie Ardiansyah Nugraha ◽  
Nur Ika Hariastuti ◽  
Vivi Setiawaty

Background: Influenza antiviral resistance has been shown to occur in many countries and is commonly found in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2). In this study, we monitored and investigated the neuraminidase inhibitor resistance of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses through the influenza surveillance system in Indonesia. Methods: A total of 4752 clinical specimens were collected from patients with influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory infection during the year 2016. An allelic discrimination assay was conducted by a single base substitution or a single-nucleotide polymorphism that is specific to the H275 wild-type and Y275 mutant. Sequencing was performed to confirm the H275Y mutations, and we analysed the phylogenetic relationship. Results: The first occurrence of oseltamivir-resistant influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was observed in the samples from the influenza-like illness surveillance. Two H275Y oseltamivir-resistant viruses (0.74%) out of 272 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 positives were found. Both of them were collected from untreated patients. Conclusion: The number of oseltamivir-resistant influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses in Indonesia is very low. However, it is necessary to continue with active surveillance for oseltamivir resistance in severe and mild cases.


Public Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mayet ◽  
S. Duron ◽  
P. Nivoix ◽  
R. Haus-Cheymol ◽  
C. Ligier ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
MAGDALENA ROMANOWSKA ◽  
ILONA STEFAŃSKA ◽  
LIDIA B. BRYDAK

The aim of this study was to analyze data collected by the SENTINEL influenza surveillance system in Poland in the first post-pandemic season 2010/2011. The results include weeks 35/2010-17/2011. Physicians registered weekly number of influenza-like illnesses and collected specimens. Laboratory tests were done using PCR and/or real-time PCR or immunofluorescence. Laboratories also isolated the influenza virus. Influenza-like illness incidence amounted to 2802.7/100000. Weekly incidence ranged from 11.3/100000 to 232/100000. The most affected group was children 0-4 years. Influenza-like illness peak occurred between weeks 02/2011 and 11/2011. Influenza infections were confirmed in 34.9% of specimens. More cases were caused by influenza A, including A(H1N1)pdm09 than influenza B (59.9% vs. 40.1%). The isolated strains were similar to A/California/7/2009 or B/Brisbane/60/2008. Season 2010/2011 in Poland did not differ from the rest of Europe. Further improvement is necessary, especially in the area of specimen collection at the beginning of an epidemic season and carrying out the isolation of the influenza virus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document