scholarly journals Efficacy of minimally invasive therapy and laser therapy in the comprehensive treatment of endoperiodontal lesions

Author(s):  
Nurgul Zh. Zholdassova ◽  
Ainur Amanzholkyzy ◽  
Azamat I. Kaikan ◽  
Yerik S. Isbulatov ◽  
Albina M. Nurtileuova

Introduction: A strategy for comprehensive treatment of endoperiodontal lesions is discussed, depending on the severity of pathology in the endodontium and periodontium associated with mild chronic generalized periodontitis. Aim: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of minimally invasive therapy and laser therapy in the comprehensive treatment of endoperiodontal lesions associated with chronic generalized periodontitis. Material and methods: Sixty patients with apical periodontitis were examined and received periodontal treatment using minimally invasive therapy and laser therapy in combination with endodontic stages of treatment. Results and discussion: Pain when biting down, sometimes aggravated with solid food, was reported for several days in 38% of cases in the control group. The patients of the study group did not report painful sensations; in 20% of cases, inconveniences only occurred with solid food during the first days. Conclusions: The study showed that in all clinical cases selected for this article, a comprehensive treatment including minimally invasive therapy and laser therapy was effective with both endodontic and periodontal sparing treatment.

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN RENNER ◽  
THOMAS FREDE ◽  
OTHMAR SEEMANN ◽  
JENS RASSWEILER

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianhui Liu ◽  
Xiaoying Gao ◽  
Jianmin Cui

Objective: To study and evaluate the incidence of pain and complications in patients with spinal trauma after minimally invasive treatment. Methods: The research period was selected from January 2018 to December 2020, and 40 patients with spinal trauma were selected. According to the random number table scheme, they were divided into the study group and the control group. The treatment scheme of the control group was traditional surgery, and the treatment scheme of the study group was minimally invasive surgery. The indicators of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Compared with the two groups of surgery and postoperative recovery related indicators, the study group had more advantages (P<0.05); Compared two groups of postoperative NRS score, VAS score and the incidence of complications, the study group had more advantages(P<0.05). Conclusion: Minimally invasive treatment of spinal trauma has significant clinical effect, which can effectively relieve postoperative pain and reduce the incidence of various complications.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Kanehira ◽  
Marco Maria Lirici ◽  
Andreas Melzer ◽  
Marc O Schurr ◽  
Elisabeth Hermann-Decker

BDJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 231 (7) ◽  
pp. 387-392
Author(s):  
Maria Inês Tavares ◽  
José Saraiva ◽  
Francisco do Vale ◽  
Ana Sofia Coelho ◽  
Inês Flores Amaro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document