Comparison of Interval Velocity and Inversion Velocity Usage to Build 3D Pore Pressure Models – Case Study: Ja Field, East Java Basin

Author(s):  
J. Arief

Pore pressure analysis is one of the stages that needs to be done before drilling and it is intended to determine indication of overpressure zones that may endanger the drilling phase. Pore pressure analysis could be done with various variables from well and/or seismic data. This study is conducted at the JA Field, East Java Basin, and focused on the claystone interval of the Ledok – Ngrayong Formation. This study will focus on interval velocity and inversion velocity in the claystone formations, which is typically showing more sensitivity to heterogeneity in such conditions. Besides mapping overpressure zone indications, this study was conducted to determine the sensitivity of the velocity variables in analyzing pore pressure and to make 3D pore pressure distribution models, where in this study interval velocity and inversion velocity were used. In addition to using the 1D pore pressure models from Well A1, Well B2 and Well C3 as a comparison, a blind test was also carried out to validate whether the two 3D pore pressure distribution models qualitatively represented the JA Field. From the pore pressure analysis results, both on the 1D and 3D models, which were carried out based on the Eaton (1975) method, it is known that there is an indication of the overpressure zone in the Wonocolo Formation with the top of overpressure zone depth at 5900-6200 ft. The 3D pore pressure models showed the overpressure zone distribution is marked by the significant color changes tendency in the center of the study area. Qualitatively, the use of interval velocity and inversion velocity in creating the 3D models appears in the distribution of different pore pressure values. However, the two 3D pore pressure models have generally represented the JA Field pore pressure distribution as evidenced by the blind test result.

Author(s):  
E. von der Fehr Hjelseth ◽  
E.R. Schomacker ◽  
C.K. Siversen ◽  
B. Pilskog ◽  
M. Ramm

2019 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 15001
Author(s):  
Benny Abraham Bungasalu ◽  
M. Syamsu Rosid ◽  
Don S. Basuki

The subsurface pressure analysis is used to detect the overpressure and problems in the well that will be drilled based on exploration well data. Various problems were found while drilling operations carried out on A and B wells, namely, Kick and Pipe sticking which cause a high Non-Productive Time (NPT). This research is conducted to identify the mechanism of overpressure formation in Tight Sand Gas and Shale Gas in the Jambi Sub-Basin. Furthermore, to predict pore pressure using the Drilling Efficiency and Mechanical Specific Energy (DEMSE) and Bowers method. The final result will be a 3D pore pressure cube in the area based on quantitative analysis of post-stack seismic inversion. The results of the pore pressure analysis from the wells and the 3D pore pressure model indicate that top of overpressure occurs in the Gumai Formation, then it is decreasing gradually approaching the hydrostatic pressure on the Basement. The mechanisms of overpressure are caused by under compaction, fluid expansion (kerogen maturation). The Gumai Formation and Talang Akar Formation are shale rocks so the type of mud weight that is well used is oil based mud (OBM).


1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Forman ◽  
G.A. Secor

Abstract The initiation of fracture in a rock mass subjected to the impingement of a continuous water jet has been studied. The jet is assumed to place a quasistatic pressure loading on the surface of the rock, which is treated as a saturated, porous-elastic, isotropic, and homogeneous half-space. While this pressure loading is held constant, the impinging water flows through the rock according to Darcy's law and pressurizes the fluid in the pores. The pore pressure distribution couples with the stress field due to the surface loading to produce an effective stress field, which can start tensile fracturing directly under the load. At various time intervals after initial impingement, the effective-stress field is computed using finite element methods and the results, together with the Griffith criterion for tensile failure, produce the loci of the zones of fracture initiation. The behavior of these zones is displayed as a function of the two jet parameters - pressure and nozzle diameter - and the five rock properties: Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, tensile strength, porosity and permeability, and time. To experimentally verify that pore pressure plays an important role in the mechanism of rock fracture due to jet impingement, thin sheets of copper (0.001 to 0.005 in.) were placed between a continuous jet (up to 20,000 psi) and the surface of a block of Indiana limestone. The purpose of the copper sheet was to allow the pressure of the jet to be transmitted to the rock, but to prevent water from entering the pore structure. Using pressure substantially greater than the threshold pressure of pressure substantially greater than the threshold pressure of limestone (3,500 psi) where penetration always occurred in the absence of the copper sheet, placement of the sheet was sufficient to prevent any visible damage from occurring to the rock surface, provided the jet did not penetrate the copper first. provided the jet did not penetrate the copper first Introduction The method by which a water jet penetrates and fractures a rock mass is highly complicated and poorly understood. This is mainly because the rock is subjected during the impact to several separate processes, each of which can cause failure. Failure can result from the effects of dynamic stress waves, static pressure loading and erosion. The degree of failure caused by each mechanism is, of course, dependent on the rock properties and jet parameters. parameters. In the first few microseconds of impingement, a subsonic jet pressure on the rock surface reaches the so-called "water hammer" pressure on the rock surface reaches the so-called "water hammer" pressure of pvv(c) and then drops to the nozzle stagnation pressure pressure of pvv(c) and then drops to the nozzle stagnation pressure of approximately 1/2 pv2. (p = fluid density, v = jet velocity, and v(c) = velocity of compression waves in the liquid.) During this initial period of impact, large-amplitude compressive waves are caused to emanate from the point of impingement. Upon reflection off a free surface, these waves become tensile and can cause spalling failures. This mode of failure is usually important with pulsed jet impingement. For continuous jets the spalling effects are small and will be neglected for this study. During the impingement process, the water of the jet flows into the accessible pore space of the rock mass. Since in a continuous jetting process the jet applies a quasi-static pressure loading to the rock surface, the water in the pores is pressurized while the surrounding rock mass is simultaneously stressed. The intent of this paper is to describe the role played by this static pressure loading coupled with the pore-pressure distribution, or pressure loading coupled with the pore-pressure distribution, or the "effective stress," in the first moments of penetration. In studying the process, we will take into account the influence of jet parameters and rock properties. In the course of the impingement process, the jet pressure loading is constantly being redistributed over the crater as it is formed. During this progressive removal of material, erosion is also contributing. The process of erosion is in itself highly complex, so no attempt will be made to characterize it here. EFFECTS OF STATIC PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION-ZERO PORE PRESSURE It has been shown by Leach and Walker that a water jet emanating from the nozzle depicted in Fig. 1 applies a quasi-scatic pressure loading to the surface upon which it is impinging. SPEJ P. 10


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
The Nguyen Dac ◽  
Dung Doan Thi My ◽  
Aqil Ahmed ◽  
Ha Phung Thai ◽  
Sadu-ur Rehman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Lopez-Solis ◽  
David Velazquez-cruz ◽  
Fabian Martinez-Gonzalez ◽  
Gustavo Espinosa-Castaneda ◽  
Martin Alberto Diaz Viera

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Wei ◽  
Yuanfang Cheng ◽  
Chuanliang Yan

During the drilling of shale formations, drilling fluids can intrude into the wellbore, raise the pore pressure, and lead to wellbore instability. Based on the thermodynamic theory, a new model was established to calculate pore pressure. The model considers the effects of solute diffusion and solution convection and conducts sensitivity analyses. The results show that the drilling fluid activity significantly affects the pore pressure distribution. The pore pressure under high drilling fluid activity will increase rapidly in the early stage. Low drilling fluid activity can effectively suppress the growth of pore pressure. And a low effective diffusion coefficient of solute and a high membrane efficiency also help to reduce pore pressure. Therefore, reducing drilling fluid activity should be conducted in priority in drilling fluid design. Lowering its solute effective diffusion coefficient and increasing its viscosity can also be considered as auxiliary methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document