scholarly journals HOW EFFECTIVE IS FUTURES AS AN INSTRUMENT OF HEDGING AGAINST PRICE RISK? -A STUDY BASED ON SPOT AND FUTURE PRICES OF GOLD

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 143-150
Author(s):  
Shafeeque Muhammad ◽  
Thomachan
Keyword(s):  
Spot Market ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Price Risk ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Risk Hedging ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Cash Market ◽  
Hedge Ratios ◽  
Opposite Position

This paper examines the role of commodity futures market as an instrument of hedging against price risk. Hedging is the practice of offsetting the price risk in a cash market by taking an opposite position in the futures market. By taking a position in the futures market, which is opposite to the position held in the spot market, the producer can offset the losses in the latter with the gains in the former. Both static and time varying hedge ratios have been calculated using VECM-MGARCH model. Variance of return from hedge portfolio has been found to be low. Further hedging effectiveness has been observed to be around 12%.

scholarly journals Empirical Evidence on Time-Varying Hedging Effectiveness of Emissions Allowances under Departures from the Cost-of-Carry Theory

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Chang
Keyword(s):  
Futures Market ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Conditional Volatility ◽  
Conditional Correlation ◽  
Spot Prices ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Hedge Ratios ◽  
Cost Of Carry ◽  
The Cost

Under departures from the cost-of-carry theory, traded spot prices and conditional volatility disturbed from futures market have significant impacts on futures price of emissions allowances, and then we propose time-varying hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness estimation using ECM-GARCH model. Our empirical results show that conditional variance, conditional covariance, and their correlation between between spot and futures prices exhibit time-varying trends. Conditional volatility of spot prices, conditional volatility disturbed from futures market, and conditional correlation of market noises implied from spot and futures markets have significant effects on time-varying hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness. In the immature emissions allowances market, market participants optimize portfolio sizes between spot and futures assets using historical market information and then achieve higher risk reduction of assets portfolio revenues; accordingly, we can obtain better hedging effectiveness through time-varying hedge ratios with departures from the cost-of-carry theory.

Optimal Hedge Ratio and Hedging Effectiveness in Stock Futures Market: Evidence from National Stock Exchange, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-152
Author(s):  
A. Shanthi ◽  
R. Thamilselvan
Keyword(s):  
Banking Sector ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Hedge Ratio ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Optimal Hedge

The major objective of the study is to examine the performance of optimal hedge ratio and hedging effectiveness in stock futures market in National Stock Exchange, India by estimating the following econometric models like Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and time varying Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (MGARCH) model by evaluating in sample observation and out of sample observations for the period spanning from 1st January 2011 till 31st March 2018 by accommodating sixteen stock futures retrieved through www.nseindia.com by considering banking sector of Indian economy. The findings of the study indicate both the in sample and out of sample hedging performances suggest the various strategies obtained through the time varying optimal hedge ratio, which minimizes the conditional variance performs better than the employed alterative models for most of the underlying stock futures contracts in select banking sectors in India. Moreover, the study also envisage about the model selection criteria is most important for appropriate hedge ratio through risk averse investors. Finally, the research work is also in line with the previous attempts Myers (1991), Baillie and Myers (1991) and Park and Switzer (1995a, 1995b) made in the US markets

Examining the Hedging Effectiveness of Futures Contracts over Pre and Post Financial Crisis Period: Evidence from National Stock Exchange of India

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kapil Gupta ◽  
Mandeep Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Futures Contracts ◽  
Price Risk ◽  
Hedge Ratio ◽  
Crisis Period ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Hedge Ratios ◽  
Time Invariant

Present study examines the efficiency of futures contracts in hedging unwanted price risk over highly volatile period i.e. June 2000 - December 2007 and January 2008 – June 2014, pre and post-financial crisis period, by using S&PC NXNIFTY, CNXIT and BANKNIFTY for near month futures contracts. The hedge ratios have been estimated by using five methods namely Ederingtons Model, ARMA-OLS, GARCH (p,q), EGARCH (p,q) and TGARCH (p,q). The study finds that hedging effectiveness increased during post crisis period for S&PC NXNIFTY and BANKNIFTY. However, for CNXIT hedging effectiveness was better during pre-crisis period than post crisis. The study also finds that time-invariant hedge ratio is more efficient than time-variant hedge ratio.

One-Factor and Two-Factor Dynamic Hedging of Futures Contracts with Different Maturities for Emissions Allowances

2013 ◽  
Vol 380-384 ◽  
pp. 4529-4536
Author(s):  
Chang Kai ◽  
Zhen Yu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Market Price ◽  
Futures Contracts ◽  
Effectiveness Evaluation ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Slight Effect ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Hedge Ratios ◽  
Hedging Policy ◽  
Speed Change

Unexpected market information have a different speed change to market price of futures contracts with different maturities, and the paper estimates one-factor and two-factor dynamics hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness evaluation. One-factor and two-factor hedge ratios of futures contracts with different maturities for emissions allowances have time-varying trends. Compared with one-factor hedging, with an increase of span period, market participations can achieve a slight effect on risk reduction of portfolio revenues of futures contracts with different maturities by using two-factor hedge ratios, and especially two-factor hedging policy exhibits better hedging effectiveness for longer-term span period of futures contracts with different maturities for emissions allowances.

Risk Management with KOSDAQ50 Index Futures Markets

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-79
Author(s):  
Gyu Hyeon Mun ◽  
Jeong Hyo Hong
Keyword(s):  
Garch Model ◽  
Minimum Variance ◽  
Price Risk ◽  
Risk Minimization ◽  
Index Futures ◽  
Hedging Strategies ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Hedge Ratios ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Hedging Performance

This paper studies hedging strategies that use the KOSDAQ50 index futures to hedge the price risk of the KOSDAQ50 index spot portfolio. This study uses the minimum variance hedge model and bivariate ECT-GARCH (1,1) model as hedging models, and analyzes their hedging performances. The sample period covers from January 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002. The most important findings may be summarized as follows. First, both the risk-minimization and GARCH model exhibit hedge ratios that are substantially lower than one. Hedge ratios of the risk-minimization tend to be higher than those of GARCH model. Second, for the in-sample data, hedging effectiveness of GARCH model is higher than that of the risk-minimization, while for the out-of-sample data, hedging effectiveness of the risk-minimization with constant hedge ratios is not far behind the GARCH model in its hedging performance. Third, the hedging performance of KOSDAQ50 index futures is lower than that of KOSPI200 index futures, but higher than that of KTB futures. In conclusion, in the KOSDAQ50 index market, investors are encouraged to use the simple risk-minimization model to hedge the price risk of KOSDAQ50 spot portfolios.

scholarly journals The Impact of Futures Price Volatility to Spot Market : Case of Coffee in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Erma Wulandari ◽  
Harianto Harianto ◽  
Bustanul Arifin ◽  
Heny K Suwarsinah
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Spot Market ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Spot Price ◽  
Price Risk ◽  
Price Inflation ◽  
Spot Prices ◽  
Futures Price ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia is the world 4th largest coffee producer after Brazil, Vietnam and Colombia with export potential and higher national consumption concluded in 2017 while the coffee production was relatively stagnant. This was led the producer to not only the production risk but also the price risk which then emphasize the importance of futures markets existence as price risk management. This study is performed to examine the impact of futures price volatility to spot market using ARCH-GARCH toward primary data of coffee futures and spot prices of 1172 trading days starting from January 2014 to June 2018. The ARCH-GARCH analysis result indicates that futures price volatility and monetary variables are impacting the volatility of spot price. Arabica spot price volatility is impacted by volatility of Arabica futures price, inflation and exchange rate while Robusta spot price is impacted by Robusta futures price volatility and exchange rate. This is confirming that futures market plays dominant role in spot price discovery. Local futures and spot prices are also found to be significantly influenced by volatility of offshore futures prices which indicates that emerging country futures market is actually influenced by offshore futures market which the price itself used as price reference.

Incentive mechanisms and hedging effectiveness – an experimental study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Difang Wan ◽  
Wenhu Wang ◽  
Chen Shang ◽  
Fang Wan
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Finance ◽  
Design Theory ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Incentive Mechanisms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Hedging Effectiveness ◽  
Exploratory Experiment ◽  
Long Term Impact ◽  
Brokerage Firms

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of four different incentives in improving hedging effectiveness and propose an alternative regulatory mechanism for China’s futures market.Design/methodology/approachThe research method that this study uses is a laboratory experiment, and this study follows the basic norms of experimental research. In addition, this paper designs and conducts a game experiment between hedgers and futures brokerage firms (FBFs) under different incentive mechanisms.FindingsBy analyzing the experimental data, it is found that compared with other incentive mechanisms, hedgers’ willingness to hedge and FBFs’ regulatory intention are both significantly higher for the dynamic linkage updating mechanism, indicating that hedgers have a stronger willingness to follow their hedging plan, and FBFs are more responsible for their regulatory behaviors. Additionally, the dynamic linkage updating mechanism has a long-term impact on effective hedging in the futures market.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings suggest that the dynamic linkage updating mechanism is beneficial for effectively restricting both hedgers’ over-speculation and FBFs’ regulatory slack and improving the hedging efficiency of the futures market.Practical implicationsTo solve the problem of inefficient hedging in China’s futures market, i.e., hedgers’ over-speculation and FBFs’ passive collusion with hedgers, the regulators of China’s futures market should reform the existing incentives and adopt a dynamic linkage updating mechanism to encourage all the participants to actively improve hedging effectiveness.Originality/valueThis paper analyzes and verifies, for the first time, the role of the dynamic linkage updating mechanism in the investing behaviors of hedgers and the regulatory behaviors of future brokerage firms. The futures market experiment that was designed and used in this study is a pioneering and exploratory experiment that applies game theory and mechanism design theory to the field of behavioral finance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document