scholarly journals INDUCTION OF LABOUR

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 385-389
Author(s):  
Munawar Afzal ◽  
Uzma Asif ◽  
Bushra Miraj
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B ◽  
Present Pregnancy

It is now widely accepted that trial for vaginal delivery should be attempted unlessa genuine indication exists for C- section. Objective: To determine the efficacy of membranesweeping for onset of labor till 41 weeks of gestation and mode of delivery in patients withprevious one cesarean section (C-Section). Study Design: Randomized control trial. Setting:Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Benazir Bhutto hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: Jan2008 to Dec 2008. Methods: Pregnant women with previous one C- section were randomlyallocated to Group-A (sweeping of membrane) and Group-B (no intervention) each having 55patients. There was no absolute indication of cesarean section in present pregnancy. Aftercomplete antenatal examination, tests like CBC, urine DR, BSR, urea, creatitnine, screening forhepatitis B and C were done. In group A, digital sweeping of fetal membranes was started a37 weeks and was done every 3rd day till she went into the labor or she reached 41 weeks. At41 weeks of gestation, if she did not go into labor, induction with prostaglandin or elective Csectionwas done depending upon the bishop score. In group B, patients awaited spontaneousonset of labor till 41 weeks. After 41 weeks induction with prostaglandin or elective C- cesareansection was done. Results: In Group A, 43 (78.18%) patients had onset of labour aftersweeping of membranes while 12 (21.82%) patients had no onset of labour. In Group-B, 28patients (50.90%) had spontaneous onset of labor while 27 (49.10%) had no onset of labours.In Group-A, 34 (61.82%) patients and in Group-B only 14 (25.45%) were delivered vaginally (pValue 0.001). In Group-A, lower segment cesarean section was done in 6 (10.91%) patientswhile in Group-B, 23 (41.82%) had cesarean section (p Value 0.001). Assisted vaginal deliverywas done in 15 (27.27%) in Group-A while 18 (32.73%) patients in Group-B had assistedvaginal delivery (p Value 0.533). Conclusions: In patients with previous one cesarean section,the efficacy of membrane sweeping in terms of onset of labor and normal vaginal delivery issignificantly higher as compared to patients who had no sweeping of membranes.

scholarly journals Comparison of intra operative hemorrhage by blunt and sharp expansion of uterine incision at cesarean section

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiza Faiza ◽  
Farhadia Sadaf ◽  
Behzar Ameena ◽  
Nadia Rashid Khan
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
P Value ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Uterine Incision ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Hb Concentration ◽  
Open Access Article

Objectives: To compare the effect of blunt and sharp incision of uterus at cesarean section on intra-operative haemorrhage. Methods: This trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pakistan Ordinance Factory Hospital, Wah Cantt from 14th January to 13th July 2012. Total 80 women planned for lower segment cesarean section through Pfannensteil incision were randomized to either blunt uterine incision (Group-A, n=40) or sharp uterine incision (Group-B, n=40). The fall in Haemoglobin and HCT was compared in two groups and analyzed with help of SPSS version 10. Results: Both groups were similar in terms of demographic features like age, parity, gestational age and indication for cesarean section. The participants in Group-A reveled significantly less drop of mean Hb concentration as compared to Group-B (1.47±1.08 and 1.95±0.85 respectively, P value 0.031). Similarly, the fall in mean HCT was significantly less in Group-A in comparison to Group-B (3.21±1.3 and 4.21±2.17 respectively, P-value 0.015) Conclusion: Blunt expansion of uterine incision during caesarean section is associated with less fall in Haemoglobin and HCT as compared to sharp expansion. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4159 How to cite this:Faiza, Sadaf F, Ameena B, Khan NR. Comparison of intra operative hemorrhage by blunt and sharp expansion of uterine incision at cesarean section. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4159 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Post-Operative Outcomes of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Major Abdominal Surgery in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Control Trial in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Nirupama Saha ◽  
Nadiuzzaman Khan ◽  
Mirza Kamrul Zahid ◽  
Shah Alam Talukder ◽  
ASM Meftahuzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intravenous Lidocaine ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B

Background: Post-operative outcomes of a major abdominal surgery depend on careful & effective post-operative management. But it is a critical job especially in children. Obtaining adequate analgesia after major surgery is a problematic issue and postoperative pain still imposes a major burden of suffering in surgical patients.Objectives: The principle objectives of the study is to evaluate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion in pain management of pediatric population undergone in major abdominal surgery; to reduce post-operative morbidity & enhance better surgical outcome in children.Methodology: This is a randomized control trial carried out from January 2015-June2015,in a tertiary care hospital among 60 cases of 4 to 14 years children with major abdominal surgery without having any pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency. Grouping of patients that is lidocaine infusion group (Group A) and control group (Group B) was made among admitted cases for elective abdominal surgery by simple random technique by means of lottery. For assessment of postoperative pain FLACC Scale was used in both groups. Clinical examination findings & specifically designed data collection sheet with a set questionnaire were used as research instruments. Formulated data was analyzed by SPSS version 17, taking p value <0.05 as significant.Results: It is noted that, after 24 hours of operation most of the patients 56.7% of group A had mild pain whereas 90% patients of group B had moderate pain (p<0.001)& during that time there was no patient with severe pain in group A whereas in group B 10% patients were with severe pain. At 48 hours, pain was absent in 13.3% children of group A and 6.7% in group B. In group A most of the children 76.7%had mild pain compared to moderate pain 18 (60%) in group B children at that hours (P<0.001). Again, regarding required amount of analgesics, patients received I/V lidocaine required less amount of analgesics than its counterpart. In present study, complications was noted only 3.3% patien in group A, where as in the opposite group it was found in 23.3% & p was <0.05. In group A, in 50% patients post operative bowel sound was returned within 72 hours, compared to 73.3% patients in group B. The p value was 0.001. About post-operative hospital stay, 83.3% children of the group A were released from hospital after 5th P.O.D whereas, in group B, only 50% children were released after 7th P.O.D of operation. The P value was 0.03 that is also significant.Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine could improve immediate and late post-operative pain with early recovery after major abdominal surgery in children & it can contribute to rapid postoperative rehabilitation programs.J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2018, Vol.10(1); 23-27

scholarly journals A study of effect of oral PGE1 and cervical PGE2 on induction of labor and mode of delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2160
Author(s):  
Sukanya Mukherjee ◽  
H. Valson ◽  
Balaji K.
Keyword(s):  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
P Value ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labor is one of the most important procedures done by the Obstetricians. Induction of labor with the help of prostaglandins offer the advantage of promoting cervical ripening along with stimulating the contractility of the myometrium.Methods: 200 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy both nulliparous and multiparous, were included in the study at term gestation (>39weeks) with Bishop’s score <6, and reactive NST. The subjects were divided in to two groups Group A including patients who were given oral PGE1 - 50 mcg Tab, and Group B with cervical PGE2, 0.5 mg, gel. The outcome indicators were recorded in both Group A and Group B and analyzed. The mean time taken from induction to vaginal delivery in Group A was 628±67 minutes and in Group B was 839±118 minutes. Incidence of LSCS in Group B when compared to Group A (p value <0.005).Results: Incidence of LSCS in Primi’s in Group B compared to Primi’s in Group A was statistically significant (p value 0.009). Non-progression of labor was observed to be the major indication for LSCS in Group B. Meconium stained labor was found to be the major indication for LSCS in Group A.Conclusions: The study concludes that using 50 mcg oral misoprostol, is an effective and safe mode of induction of labor in comparison to PGE2 gel. Vaginal deliveries are more with the use of oral misoprostol and the induction to delivery interval is also lesser than that in cervical PGE2 use.

scholarly journals Epigastric pain after intravenous administration of oxytocin in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A quasi experimental study comparing intravenous bolus with infusion technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Ali Kashif ◽  
Rizwana Bashir Kiani ◽  
Syed Muhammad Asad Shabbir ◽  
Tariq Mahmood ◽  
Ghulam Sabir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Epigastric Pain ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Infusion Technique

Aim: To compare the frequency of epigastric pain and uterotonic effect of an equivalent dose of oxytocin administered as an intravenous bolus versus intravenous infusion during elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia. Methodology: We recruited 98 parturients undergoing elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia for this prospective quasi experimental study and divided them into two groups. Group-A received 5 IU of oxytocin as bolus intravenous (IV) injection in 5 sec (bolus group, n= 48), and Group-B (infusion group, n= 50) received 5 IU of oxytocin as an infusion over 5 min. Any complaint of epigastric pain by the patients was noted and its frequency was compared between the two groups. The uterine tone was assessed as adequate or inadequate by an obstetrician. The data were entered into SPSS version 22. Patient demographic data were analyzed with independent samples T-test and the study data were analyzed with Chi‑square test and presented as n (%). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Epigastric pain was noted in 25 (52.03%) out of 48 parturients in Group-A and 15 (30%) out of 50 in Group-B (p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in the uterotonic effect of oxytocin between the two groups (p = 0.736). Conclusion:  We conclude that oxytocin infusion is associated with lower frequency of epigastric pain in elective LSCS when compared to intravenous bolus of an equivalent dose of oxytocin, However, the effect on uterine contractions was adequate with both methods. Citation: Kashif A, Kiani RB, Shabbir SMA, Mahmood T, Sabir G, Fatima NE, Khan WA. Epigastric pain after intravenous administration of oxytocin in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A quasi experimental study comparing intravenous bolus with infusion technique. Anaesth pain intensive care 2020;24(1):_ DOI: https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v2i1. Received – 20 February 2019; Reviewed – 4, 16 March, 25 June, 9 September, 2, 25 November, 10 December 2019, 7 January 2020; Revised – 19 June, 10 August, 29 September, 1 November 2019, 6 January 2020; Accepted – 10 January 2020;

scholarly journals Mifepristone versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in primigravid patients at term

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Sah ◽  
Saraswati M. Padhye
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Human Reproduction ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Birth Canal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Group B

Background: The cervix has to play dual role in human reproduction. During pregnancy, it should remain firm and closed allowing the fetus to grow in utero until functional maturity is attained while during labour it should soften and dilate, allowing the fetus to pass through the birth canal. Objective of present study was to know and compare the effect of oral Mifepristone with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical priming prior to induction of labour at term in an unfavorable cervix of primigravida.Methods: This was prospective randomized comparative study. 100 primigravid patients were included, 50 were placed in each group A and B. Tablet Mifepristone 200mg orally was given in group A patients and intracervical dinoprostone gel induction was done in group B patients. Pre induction Bishop’s score was noted at beginning to compare improvement in Bishop’s score after induction. Mode of delivery and induction to delivery interval in both the groups were studied.Results: After induction with Mifepristone 76% women had successful cervical ripening as compared to 56% with dinoprostone. Rate of vaginal delivery was 70% with Mifepristone and 58% with dinoprostone. There was no significant difference in induction to delivery interval between the groups. Ten percent and 2% belonging to mifepristone and dinoprostone group respectively, required NICU admissions.Conclusions: Mifepristone is more effective than dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening as it has high success rate of achieving cervical ripening, however there is no significant difference in the vaginal delivery rate and other maternal and fetal outcome.

scholarly journals Oral and vaginal route of misoprostol for induction of labour: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1956
Author(s):  
Deepti D. Sharma ◽  
Kavita A. Chandnani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background: Induction of labour can be defined as “Artificial initiation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labour, after the period of viability, by any methods, for purpose of vaginal delivery.” The key factor for a successful induction is the status of cervix, its form, consistency and dilatation which is determined by the Bishop score. In case of unfavourable cervix or in the pregnancies remote from the term; prostaglandins are more effective than any other method of induction. Introduction of misoprostol, PGE1 analogue, for the induction of labour in 1993 and its approval for clinical use by ACOG (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology) in 1999 has been the most significant advancement. It is the latest drug for induction of labour which is cheap and stable at room temperature and is being used worldwide in different doses and by various routes. We compared the most commonly preferred two routes; vaginal and oral in terms of success of induction and noted the adverse events and side effects in both routes.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at SBKSMIRC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Dhiraj general hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, 200 patients who required induction of labour were recruited after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided in two groups- Group A meant to receive 50µg oral misoprostol, Group B - meant to receive 25µg vaginal misoprostol repeated 4 hourly up to maximum of five doses. Progress of labour was charted on the partograph. The mean induction delivery interval, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and complications were observed.Results: The mean induction to delivery interval was significantly less in vaginal group than oral (23.3±12.4 hours in oral vs. 17.3±10 hours in vaginal). Vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates were comparable in both groups (76% in Group A vs. 72% in Group B for vaginal delivery, 18% vs. 20% for Cesarean section, respectively). 58% patients in Group A required more than two doses as compared to 39% in group B, though the difference was statistically not significant. Significant number of patients required added oxytocin administration in Group A (72%). No major complications or adverse events were observed. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was seen more in Group A.Conclusions: Both Oral misoprostol in a dose of 50μg and vaginal misoprostol 25 μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, have the potential to induce labour safely and effectively. The vaginal route however is beneficial in effecting delivery in lesser time with few numbers of doses as compared to oral route.

scholarly journals Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Tamsulosin in Clearance of Upper Ureteral Calculi- A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
Md Safiul Alam Babul ◽  
Md Waliul Islam ◽  
Shariful Islam Khan ◽  
Mohammad Habibur Rahman ◽  
Anup Roy Chowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clearance Rate ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ureteric Stone ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Clearance ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B

Background of the study: Urolithiasis has an incidence in the world of about 5% and the probability of a recurrence within 5–7 years is 50% (Parmar, 2004). Exact data about its prevalence is not known in Bangladesh but it is quite common as seen in outpatient department. It is more common in northern part of the country, male suffer more than female (M:F: 3:1) (Salam, 2002). Symptomatic ureteral calculi represent the most common condition encountered by an urologist in an emergency setting (Pak, 1998). Intervention is recommended for individuals with larger stones, especially greater than 5 mm (Kupeli et al., 1998). The treatment of this pathology was revolutionized with the introduction, in the late 1980s, of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), a non-invasive technology that has become one of the primary treatments for urinary stones. Its success rates vary depending on stone size and location and by the type of lithotripter employed. Medical expulsion therapy (MET) can play a key role in support of ESWL: specifically, expulsion is done by diuretics, calcium antagonists, anti-edema agents, and alpha-blockers. A few studies have reported their effectiveness (Borghi et al., 1994, Cervenakov et al., 2002, Porpiglia et al., 2002,Dellabella et al., 2003). Objective: This study is carried out to find out the role of Tamsulos in stone clearance in patientswith upper ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods & Material: This randomized control clinical trialwas performed in Department of Urology, National Institute of Kidney Diseases and Urology, Sher-EBangla Nagar, Dhaka during the period from July 2015 to June 2017. A total of 70 cases with upper ureteric stone were included during the study period. Patients were selected randomly in every alternate sequence, odd numbers for experimental group, Tamsulosin+ ESWL, group A & even numbers for control group, only ESWL, group B. Stone clearance rate, number of ESWL session and stone expulsion time were evaluated. Results: In this study showed complete stone clearance one month after ESWL in Group A was 16(89%) and Group B was 16(84.21%) for stone size 6 to 10 mm. Comparison of clearance rate between two groups in stone size 6 to 10 mm was not statistically significant (p value >.05). Complete stone clearance one month after ESWL in Group A was 13(76%) and Group B was 07(43.75%) for stone size 11 to 15 mm. Comparison of clearance rate between two groups in stone size 11 to 15 mm was statistically significant (p value <.05). In this study requirement of number of ESWL sessions according to the stone size showed, in case of 6 to 10 mm stone size, average ESWL sessions 1.28±0.5 in Group A and 1.53±0.7 in Group B and in case of 11to 15 mm stone size, average ESWL sessions 1.29±0.5 in Group A and 1.62±0.7 in Group B. Comparison of ESWL sessions between two groups were statistically significant (p value <.05). In this study mean expulsion time of stone in Group A was 22.34±12.23 days and in Group B was 32.34±21.96 days. Comparison of stone expulsion time between two groups were statistically significant (p value <.05). Conclusion: Tamsulosin results in increased stone-free rates and in lower percentages of patients requiring re-treatment. Tamsulosin can be self-administered and can play a key role in the choice between tamsulosin after ESWL and only ESWL for upper ureteric stone disease treatment. Use of tamsulosin makes the expulsive medical therapy suitable for improving overall outcomes of ESWL treatment for upper ureteral stones. Tamsulosin helps in clearance of upper ureteral stones after ESWL. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2020 p.36-42

scholarly journals Pancreaticogastrostomy as a choice of reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hospital based observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 619
Author(s):  
Hetish M. Reddy ◽  
Rajendra Bagree ◽  
Pradeep Panwar ◽  
Gaurav Jalendra
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Whipple’S Procedure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B ◽  
Larger Sample

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the rate of occurrence of post-operative pancreatic fistulae (POPF) and other complications with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) as a choice of reconstruction in classic Whipple’s Procedure.Methods: A hospital based prospective observational study collected data of 60 patients who underwent Whipple’s procedure from June 2018 to august 2019, in two different surgical units, where one-unit preferred PG as routine while the other unit preferred PJ.Results: Two out of 30 patients who underwent PG (Group A) developed POPF while Nine out of 30 patients who underwent PJ (Group B) developed POPF (p-value = 0.04) indicating a significant difference in outcome. The duration of hospital stay (DOHS) in our study in Group A was 12.82±1.74 days when compared to Group B was 13.88±2.01 days (p-value = 0.042).Conclusions: Our results indicate that the preferred reconstruction after classic Pancreaticoduodenectomy should be Pancreaticogastrostomy, but further validation with randomized control trials or multicenter studies with larger sample size are required.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of intravaginal slow release Dinoprostone insert, transcervical foley’s catheter, intracervical Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor in patients with poor Bishop’s score: a randomized control study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 932
Author(s):  
Taru Gupta ◽  
Ritu Singh ◽  
Nupur Gupta ◽  
Sangeeta Gupta ◽  
Khushbu Singal
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Labor Time ◽  
Active Labor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labor is indicated when the continuation of pregnancy poses risk to the mother or fetus. A variety of mechanical and pharmacologic methods are available but the best method of labor induction still remains unknown, study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety among the two agents: transcervical Foley’s balloon catheter (FBC) and intravaginal slow release Dinoprostone E2 insert (DVI) with dinoprostone gel as control.Methods: A total of 174 patients were randomized into three groups of 58 each (Group A: dinoprostone 10 mg slow release intravaginal insert, Group B: transcervical Foley’s 16 French catheters, and Group C as control: 0.5 mg intracervical Dinoprostone gel. The safety and efficacy was compared among the groups. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The mean insertion to active labor time (in hours) was significantly lower in Group A as compared to Group B (5.88±3.06 versus 13.56±2.8, p < 0.0001). Meantime of insertion to delivery (in hours) was significantly lower in Group A as compared to Group B (10.91±5.24 versus 21.17±2.99, p < 0.0001). The requirement of oxytocin for induction and augmentation in Group A was significantly lower as compared to Group B. Majority of the patients had normal vaginal delivery (NVD) in all the three groups. Regarding safety profile we found that slow-release DVI had more incidence of uterine tachysystole, but none of the cases had any fetal heart rate abnormality. Maternal fever was more in the FBC group, however, neonatal outcomes were comparable in both groups.Conclusions: The study concludes that slow release DVI is better in terms of efficacy as compared to transcervical FBC for induction of labor as assessed by improvement in Bishop score, insertion to active labor time and insertion to delivery time and comparable in terms of safety profile.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS AN ADJUVANT WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CESAREAN SECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Neeti Mahla
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthesia for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia of intrathecal nalbuphine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in cesarean section. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double?blind, and comparative study was conducted on 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II. These patients were randomized into three groups with fifty patients in each group. Group A received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg), Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml fentanyl (20 ?g), and Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml of normal saline. Results: The mean duration of sensory block was 107.32 ± 5.36 min in Group A, 111.23 ± 4.23 min in Group B, and 85.69 ± 2.31 min in Group C. The mean duration of motor block (time required for motor block to return to Bromage’s Grade 1 from the time of onset of motor block) was 152.02 ± 3.12 min in Group A, 151.69± 2.36 min in Group B, and 122.12 ± 2.32 min in Group C. Conclusion: We concluded that intrathecal nalbuphine prolongs postoperative analgesia maximally and may be used as an alternative to intrathecal fentanyl in cesarean section. Keywords: Nalbuphine, Bupivacaine, Fentanyl.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document