scholarly journals TIMI RISK SCORES

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1569-1573
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ijaz Bhatti ◽  
Usman Javed Iqbal ◽  
Nasir Iqbal

Background: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score predictsadverse clinical outcomes in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes(NSTEACS). Whether this score correlates with the coronary anatomy is unknown. Objective:To determine the frequency of low, moderate and high TIMI risk score in patients of NSTEACSand to compare the frequency of two vessel coronary artery disease on angiography withlow, moderate and high TIMI risk scores in patients of NSTE-ACS. Study design: This was across sectional study. Setting: Department of Cardiology, Gulab Devi Chest Hospital, Lahore.Duration: Six months. Patients and Methods: Total 170 patients were included in the study.Patients’ selection was done with the help of a pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. TIMIrisk score was calculated for each patient and patients were categorized into low, moderate andhigh risk groups (as per operational definition). Patients were further evaluated with coronaryangiograms to assess the double vessel CAD. All angiographies were performed by a singlephysician. Data analysis was done on SPSS version 17. Results: Mean age of our patients was54.81±10.55 years. Gender distribution shows that there were 106(62%) male and 64(38%)female patients. TIMI score risk classification showed that among 50(29.4%) patients TIMI riskscore was low, among 107(62.9%) patients it was moderate and in 13(7.6%) patients it washigh. There were 105(62%) patients who had two vessel coronary artery disease. Among 105patients who had two vessel coronary artery disease, 25(23.8%) had low TIMI score, 69(65.7%)had moderate and 11(10.5%) of the patients had high TIMI score. Conclusion: In patientswith non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac catheterization, the TIMIrisk score is significantly associated with two vessel coronary artery disease. So it should berecommended that a routine invasive strategy be carried in patients with moderate or higherTIMI risk score.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-73
Author(s):  
ABK Bashiruddin ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Chowdhury ◽  
Biplob Bhattacharjee ◽  
Abul Hossen Shahin ◽  
Syed Ali Ahsan ◽  
...  

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend that optimal management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should include patient risk stratification. Predicting the anatomical extension of coronary artery disease (CAD) is also potentially useful for clinical decision. Objective: The objective of our study was to determine whether the TIMI risk score correlates with the angiographic extent and severity of CAD in patients with NSTE- ACS. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study carried out in the Department of Cardiology, Chattogram Medical College Hospital (CMCH) from September 2017 to May 2018. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with NSTE- Acute Coronary Syndrome were included as sample by purposive sampling method. TIMI risk score for each patient was calculated and the patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the TIMI risk score: low risk (0-2); intermediate risk (3-4); high risk (5-7). The severity of the CAD was assessed by Vessel score and Gensini score. Result: The mean ± SD of the age of study population was 53.7 ±10.8 years (range 37–77) and 142 (71%) were male. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, 137 (68.5%) patients had diabetes mellitus, 83 (41.5%) had dyslipidaemia, 155 (77.5%) had hypertension, 136 (68%) were current smoker and 70 (35%) had a family history of CAD. The Gensini score was higher in patients at high risk TIMI group (p<0.001). Moreover, there was a signiûcant positive correlation between the TIMI and Gensini score (r=0.446,p<0.001). TIMI score can predict significant CAD moderately well (area under the curve 0.661, p=0.001). Patients with TIMI score > 4 were more likely to have significant three vessel CAD (65.9%) versus those with TIMI risk score 3-4 (17.9%) and TIMI risk score < 3 (2%) (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Study showed the TIMI score is significantly correlated with the extent of CAD as assessed by the Gensini score. It is accurate for predicting severe CAD among NSTE-ACS patients. University Heart Journal Vol. 15, No. 2, Jul 2019; 68-73


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252855
Author(s):  
Regitze Skals ◽  
Maria Lukács Krogager ◽  
Emil Vincent R. Appel ◽  
Theresia M. Schnurr ◽  
Christian Theil Have ◽  
...  

Aims Insulin resistance associates with development of metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease. The link between insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease is complex and multifactorial. Confirming the genetic link between insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease, as well as the extent of coronary artery disease, is important and may provide better risk stratification for patients at risk. We investigated whether a genetic risk score of 53 single nucleotide polymorphisms known to be associated with insulin resistance phenotypes was associated with diabetes and burden of coronary artery disease. Methods and results We genotyped patients with a coronary angiography performed in the capital region of Denmark from 2010–2014 and constructed a genetic risk score of the 53 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Logistic regression using quartiles of the genetic risk score was performed to determine associations with diabetes and coronary artery disease. Associations with the extent of coronary artery disease, defined as one-, two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease, was determined by multinomial logistic regression. We identified 4,963 patients, of which 17% had diabetes and 55% had significant coronary artery disease. Of the latter, 27%, 14% and 14% had one, two or three-vessel coronary artery disease, respectively. No significant increased risk of diabetes was identified comparing the highest genetic risk score quartile with the lowest. An increased risk of coronary artery disease was found for patients with the highest genetic risk score quartile in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, OR 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.42, p = 0.02) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.06, 1.48, p<0.01), respectively. In the adjusted multinomial logistic regression, patients in the highest genetic risk score quartile were more likely to develop three-vessel coronary artery disease compared with patients in the lowest genetic risk score quartile, OR 1.41 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.82, p<0.01). Conclusions Among patients referred for coronary angiography, only a strong genetic predisposition to insulin resistance was associated with risk of coronary artery disease and with a greater disease burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document