INTER-TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES;

Introduction: Hip fractures are a leading cause of death and disability among elderly. Approximately half of these injuries are intertrochanteric fractures and the incidence is continuously increasing. These fractures are the most common injuries around the hip region and are more common in elderly people. Different types of implants were tried at different times for internal fixation of these fractures, of which dynamic hip screw has remained the most popular one. But with the advent of some newer implants, the efficacy of dynamic hip screw is being questioned. Objectives: To determine the results of dynamic hip screw as a method of internal fixation in closed stable as well as unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur in adults. Design: Descriptive case series. Setting: The study was conducted in orthopedic department Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Period: 11months (from 26th, march, 2015 to 25th Feb, 2016). Subjects and Methods: Sixty cases of intertrochanteric fractures were included and operated for internal fixation with dynamic hip screw under fluoroscopic guidance. Pre, per and post-operative findings during hospital stay and follow-up period were recorded. Results: We had a total 60 cases, 20 patients in group A stable intertrochanteric fractures and 40 patients in group B unstable intertrochanteric fractures. We have reported the follow up study up to 20 weeks. There were 10 (50%) male and 10 (50%) female in group A. In group B 27 (67.5%) males and 13 (32.5%) females. The youngest pt was 25 years in group A and 16 years in group B. The mean age in group A was 59.10 and st/deviation 16.942. In group B mean age was 54.85 and st/ deviation 14.123. Infection rate in group A was 5%. In group B superficial infection was 5% and deep infection was 2.5%. Nonunion in both groups was 5%. The failure rate was 5% in group A and 20% in group B. Conclusion: The use of Dynamic hip screw with aside plate is associated with good results and acceptable complication rate. Dynamic hip screw is implant of choice in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Download Full-text

A comparative study on functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and dynamic hip screw fixation: a short term perspective analysis

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20200523 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 319

Author(s):

M. R. Anand ◽

N. S. Ramachandren

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Internal Fixation ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Short Term ◽

Bipolar Prosthesis ◽

Group A ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Group B

Background: Trochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients have benefited from advances in internal fixation. Early failure of internal fixation occurs however in a number of cases. The failure after internal fixation had been due to initial fracture pattern, communication, sub-optimal fracture fixation and poor bone quality. The aim of this prospective comparative study is to analyze the short term follow up results of unstable Intertrochanteric fractures in elderly treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation.Methods: This is a study conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Government Tiruvarur Medical College, Tiruvarur. 42 elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures who were divided into two groups with group A-bipolar prosthesis (21 cases) and group B-DHS (21 cases).Results: 42 elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures who were divided into two groups with group A-bipolar prosthesis (21 cases) and group B-DHS (21 cases). Patients were evaluated clinically using the Harris hip score during their follow up period. In both groups, the most common Singh’s index was grade III, 61.90%in both group A and group B.Conclusions: From our results, we are of the opinion that bipolar hemiarthroplasty may be an efficient option in elderly osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures. It reduces the potential complications of prolonged immobilization such as pressure sores, pulmonary complications by early mobilization.

Download Full-text

DYNAMIC HIP SCREW (DHS)

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2016.23.01.800 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 23 (01) ◽

pp. 076-080

Author(s):

Mehtab Pirwani ◽

Abbas Memon ◽

Shakeel Ahmed Memon

Keyword(s):

Deep Infection ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Gender Ratio ◽

Superficial Infection ◽

Non Union ◽

Fracture Table ◽

Group A ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Comparative Results ◽

Group B

Objectives: To analyze the comparative results of dynamic DHS fixation in stableand the unstable intertrochanteric fractures at LUH. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting:Orthopedic unit I of LUH Jamshoro. Period: 26th May 2010 – 25th August 2011. Methodology:All 40 patients with femur intertrochanteric fracture were enlisted. All cases isolated in 2 groupsevery having 20 patients, group A stable fracture and group B unstable fractures. After completephysical examination, examinations and fracture arrangement evaluation, patients were readiedfor operation. Fracture table was used in each operation. Fracture reduction was initiallyattempted by close manipulation and was successful in 30 (75%) cases. Lateral approach forproximal femur was used in every case. All fractures, whether stable or unstable, were reducedanatomically without any type of osteotomy and then fixed with 135o dynamic hip screw.Results: Mean age was 62.8.2 years of the cases. Gender ratio was 3:1. According to modeof injury were found RTA in 21 (70%) patients. Postoperative complications were recorded as;superficial infection noted in 2 (5%) patients and there was no case of deep infection. Averagestay of hospital found 16.5 days in 17 (42.5%) patients belongs to stable group and 06 (15%)patients belong to unstable group. All (n=40) patients were pain free on their discharge fromhospital. In all (n=40) patients we achieved union and there was no case of delayed unionor non-union. We assessed functional outcome of our patients on the base of Stinchfield HipAssessment system. According to SHAS 28 (70%) patients were excellent, 05 (12.5%) patientswere good, 04 (10%) were fair and 03 (7.5) were poor. We had not found mortality in our patients.Conclusions: According to our conclusion DHS is the best implant for intertrochanteric fracturefixation. No matter; whether fracture is stable, unstable and fresh or old.

Download Full-text

Reduction in Blood Loss with Tranexamic Acid use in Dynamic Hip Screw Surgery for Intertrochanteric Fractures

10.53350/pjmhs211571657 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (7) ◽

pp. 1657-1760

Author(s):

Muhammad Akram ◽

Ali Muqadas ◽

Arif Mahmood ◽

Faheem Mubashir Farooqi ◽

Shumaila Jabbar

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Tranexamic Acid ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Control Group ◽

P Value ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Group B

Aim: To compare the mean decrease in hemoglobin levels in fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with or without use of Tranexamic acid. Methods: This study was conducted at Orthopedics Unit II, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Total 78 patients were included in the study. Duration of study was from 15-07-2017 till 15-01-2018.Study was approved by hospital ethical committee. A written informed consent was taken. Diagnosis was made clinically and with help of radiology. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in intervention Tranexamic acid (TXA) group received 15 mg/kg of Tranexamic acid at the time of induction of anesthesia and repeated after three hours, while those in the control group received placebo which is normal saline, intravenously. Results: There were 16(41%) males and 23(59%) females in group-A. There were 15(38.5%) males and 24(61.5%) females in group-B. Mean age in group A (control) with standard deviation was 44.2051±9.64141. Mean age in group B (TXA) was 45.9744±9.03061. p value 0.0046. Mean BMI in group A was 25.65±5.136. Mean BMI in group B was 24.307±2.153. p value 0.233. In group A 13(33.3%) patients had hypertension and 26(66.67%) did not have hypertension in group-A. In group B 16 (46.2%) patients had hypertension and 21 (53.8%) did not have hypertension in group-B. Mean fall in Hb in Group A was 9.47±1.054. Mean fall in Hb in group B was 9.547±0.9402. p value 0.001. Statistically significant difference was present in Group B (TXA) in term of mean fall in Hb ( p value 0.001). Conclusion: We in our study concluded that the patients in TXA group who were given tranexamic acid 1g intravenously before start of surgery had a lesser fall in mean Hb for the operative treatment of per trochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw. Hence injecting tranexamic acid intravenously can effectively reduce the blood loss during DHS surgery for the intertrochanteric fractures. Keywords: Interochanteric fracture, tanexamic acid, blood loss

Download Full-text

Profile vs Tubular Plate in Unimalleolar or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Wound complications?

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011420s00158 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 2473011420S0015

Author(s):

Paolo Ceccarini ◽

Rosario Petruccelli ◽

Michele Bisaccia ◽

Giuseppe Rinonapoli ◽

Auro Caraffa

Keyword(s):

Wound Dehiscence ◽

Deep Infection ◽

Ankle Fractures ◽

Bone Union ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Fisher Exact Test ◽

Superficial Infection ◽

Operative Care ◽

Group B

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare two types of plates, one third tubular plate and LCP distal fibula plate, evaluating the clinical outcome and the skin complications associated with their use. Methods: We collected the data of 122 consecutive unimalleolar or bimalleolar fractures treated by internal fixation for a closed, displaced distal closed fibular fracture. Exclusion criteria were: 1) open ankle fractures,2) trimalleolar fractures, 3) previous ankle fractures 4) severe venous insufficiency, 5) ankleosteoarthritis previous to surgery, 6) associated ankle dislocation. After this selection, 93 patients were included in our study and assigned in two groups, based on using of different implant: in group A48 patients were treated with one-third tubular and in group B 45 patients were treated with LCP distalfibula plate. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Patients received the same surgical procedure and the same post-operative care, then they were radiologically evaluated at1-3-12 months and clinical examination was made at 24 (range 15-36) months using AOFAS clinical rating system. All data were evaluated using chi-square test. Results: At the final 24-month follow-up a comparison between the two groups showed no statistical significant differences in reduction accuracy and bone union ratio at radiological examination. The wound complications rate of the overall study group was 7.6%. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups. There were no differences between both group in percentage of hardware removal at follow-up (overall 5.4%). In the group A occurred 1 deep infection, 2 superficial infection, no wound dehiscence; in group B occured 1 deep infection, 1 superficial infection and 2 wound dehiscence. There were no statistical differences in the rate of wound complications between the two groups (p=0.70; Fisher exact test). Conclusion: Our study has shown no difference in radiographic bone union rate, no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes, in time of bone reduction and wound complication rate between the LCP distalfibula plate and conventional one-third tubular plate. RCT or metanalasys are in this case useful to improve scientific evidence and give more information for the correct surgical treatment of ankle fractures.

Download Full-text

Clinical Results Using the Trochanter Stabilizing Plate (TSP): The Modular Extension of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) for Internal Fixation of Selected Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma ◽

10.1097/00005131-199808000-00005 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 392-399 ◽

Cited By ~ 85

Author(s):

Reto Babst ◽

Nikolaus Renner ◽

Michael Biedermann ◽

Raphaël Rosso ◽

Michael Heberer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Fixation ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Hip Screw ◽

Modular Extension

Download Full-text

Superficial and Deep Infections Rate in Primary Total Ankle Replacement through Anterior Approach versus Lateral Transfibular Approach

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011417s000394 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (3) ◽

pp. 2473011417S0003 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Federico Giuseppe Usuelli ◽

Cristian Indino ◽

Luigi Manzi ◽

Camilla Maccario ◽

Ettore Vulcano

Keyword(s):

Anterior Approach ◽

Operative Time ◽

Deep Infection ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Trabecular Metal ◽

Ankle Replacement ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Approach Group

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis, Periprosthetic Infections Introduction/Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infections represent a relatively infrequent complication following total ankle replacement (TAR), with reported incidence ranging from 2% to 8,6%. Early treatment of any wound infection is the key to prevent disastrous outcomes. One of the most recent TARs (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) requires implantation through a lateral transfibular approach. Potential advantages of this approach include the supposed decreased risk of wound complications, thanks to a preservation of the distal leg angiosomes. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the rate of superficial and deep infections between TARs performed through an anterior approach and TARs performed through a lateral transfibular approach at 12-months follow-up. Methods: This study included 150 consecutive primary TARs performed between May 2011 and July 2015 with at least 1-year follow up. The 3-component uncemented Hintegra implant (Newdeal SA, Lyon, France) was used in 81 TARs (54.0%) through an anterior approach (group A). The 2-component uncemented Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle prosthesis, was implanted in 69 TARs (46.0%) through a lateral transfibular approach (Group B). Operative time, tourniquet time and superficial and deep infections were recorded up to 1-year follow-up. All patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated postoperatively at two, six and twelve months. Superficial wound infections were classified as dehiscence, eschar, or wound drainage according to criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for surgical wound infection. Deep infections were classified according to Fitzgerald’s classification: acute postoperative, deep late infections, late hematogenous infections. We compared the incidence of superficial and deep infections as well as the operative time. Results: In group A there were 4 (4.9%) superficial infections. Two of these patients developed a deep infection. Overall, there were 3 (3.7%) deep infections in group A that required: intravenous antibiotics and vacuum assisted closure; replacement of the tibial component and polyethylene liner; polyethylene exchange and VAC treatment. In group B, there were 2 (2.9%) superficial infections. One of these patients developed the only deep infection (1.4%) that was treated with antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of superficial (P= 0.687) and deep infections (P= 0.625). The mean operative time in group A was 115.2 minutes (65-150) and 179.5 minutes (105-333) in group B. Operative time was statistically different between group A and group B (P <0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrates a lower superficial and deep infection rate in the lateral transfibular approach group compared to the anterior approach group. Nonetheless, this difference was not statistically significant. The significantly longer operative time in the lateral approach group did not seem to affect the infection rates. In conclusion, TARs performed through a lateral approach appear to be as safe as TARs done through an anterior approach in terms of the infection rate within the first postoperative year. Further studies on larger cohorts and longer follow-up are essential to validate the findings from this study.

Download Full-text

A comparative study between proximal femur locking compression plate and dynamic hip screw fixation in management of intertrochantric femur fractures

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20164163 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2 (4) ◽

pp. 327

Author(s):

Mithlesh Kumar Meena ◽

Vinay Joshi

Keyword(s):

Locking Plate ◽

Locking Compression Plate ◽

Dynamic Hip Screw ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Trochanteric Fractures ◽

Superficial Infection ◽

Femur Fractures ◽

Compression Plate ◽

Hip Screw ◽

The Mean

Background: Proximal femur fractures are one of the commonest fracture encountered in orthopaedic trauma practice. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is the gold standard procedure for treatment for stable intertrochanteric fractures, however problem arises with unstable fractures in maintenance of neck shaft angle and proper reduction. Here we are giving results of trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) as compared with dynamic hip screw (DHS).Methods: This study was a prospective study. Two groups of trochanteric fractures of 25 patients operated with DHS and LCP were taken. Each patient was followed-up from July 2011 to October 2012 for minimum of 12 month or till the bony union. Every fracture was classified according to AO classification. Functional results will be assessed as per modified Harris hip evaluation score.Results: Among 25 patient treated with PFLCP, length discrepancy was .857 cm while that for DHS was 1.2 cm. The mean time of unaided walking with LCP Was 14.20 weeks while for DHS it was 16.20 weeks. The mean varus angulation for LCP 8 degree while for DHS 10.2 degree. In LCP in 1 case screw cut out from head and neck of femur while in DHS, same is seen in 2 cases and in addition loss of position of lag screw seen in 5 cases.one case was found with superficial infection in LCP while in case of DHS 3 cases with deep infection for that implant was removed and 6 cases were found with superficial infection.Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plate (PFLCP) is simple, stable for fixation with fewer complications, and is an effective method for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Comparing with DHS group, the locking plate has shorter operative time, fewer blood loss and drainage.

Download Full-text

Clinical results of Visian implantable collamer lens implantation according to various sizes and implantation angles

European Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1177/11206721211033468 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 112067212110334

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Case Series ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Implantable Collamer Lens ◽

Retrospective Case ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Lens Implantation ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B

Purpose: To investigate the clinical outcomes of Visian implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation according to lens size and implantation angle. Setting: Onnuri Smile Eye Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: This study included 566 eyes of 283 patients treated with ICL implantation. Patients were divided into three groups: horizontally implanted same-sized ICL (group A), horizontally implanted different sized-ICL (group B: large ICL and small ICL) and same sized-ICL implanted with a different implantation angle (group C: horizontal and vertical). Results: At 12-month follow-up, the mean vault was 0.78 ± 17, 0.48 ± 0.13, 0.71 ± 0.18 and 0.44 ± 0.16 mm when large and small sized ICL was used in group B ( p < 0.001), and when ICL was horizontally and vertically implanted in group C ( p = 0.021), respectively. And the mean SE was −0.11 ± 0.30, −0.34 ± 0.42, −0.3 ± 0.56 and −0.64 ± 0.66 dioptres (D), when the large and the small sized ICL was used group B ( p = 0.039), and when the ICL was horizontally and vertically implanted in group C ( p = 0.036), respectively. No significant difference in UDVA, IOP and ECD between both eyes in groups B and C was observed. No statistical difference was found in the vault between both eyes for groups B and C. Conclusions: The vault was significantly higher and the SE was significantly more hyperopic when a larger-sized ICL was used or the ICL was horizontally implanted compared to when the ICL was vertically implanted.

Download Full-text