scholarly journals Perinatal Morbidity & Mortality following repeat Cesarean section due to five or more previous Cesarean Section done in Tertiary centre in KSA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 045-051
Author(s):  
Farid G
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Perinatal Morbidity ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Previous Cesarean

“THE WAR WHEN YOU ALREADY HAVE A SCAR” -STUDY OF DIFFICULTIES IN EXTRACTION OF BABY IN PREVIOUS CESAREAN SECTION

2021 ◽  
pp. 68-70
Author(s):  
Ashwini N Hotkar ◽  
Prashanth Bhingare ◽  
Srinivas Gadappa ◽  
Sasireka Kuppuswami ◽  
Priyanka Kesharwani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Pregnancy Status ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Time Of Operation ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background:The study of intraoperative difculties in extraction of baby in previous cesarean section Method:This is a tertiary centre based prospective observational study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at our tertiary health Care hospital between the study period October 2018-september 2020.A total 1200 cases of patients with previous cesarean section were studied . They are divided into number of previous scar and the intraoperative surgical difculty encountered by the surgeon in delivering the baby based on the consequences of scar from previous cesarean section. Results: The incidence of repeat cesarean section being 9.4%, among which only of 38% cases were encountered with difculties in cesarean section by the surgeons in the institute. Among which 26.3% cases were encountered with Adhesions,4.2% with difculty in delivery of baby, 1.5% cases needed assistance by senior surgeon in delivering baby and 6% among that had poor perinatal outcome. Conclusions: The common clinical entity of “previous cesarean section” in subsequent pregnancies, giving a high risk pregnancy status to the reference pregnancy. The risks associated with repeat cesarean section can be reduced by many measures including-vigorous ANC surveillance to reduce the risk of primary CS, intervention by operative vaginal delivery whenever needed, giving trial of labor in cesarean section(TOLAC) with skilled monitoring, counselling of patients regarding perineal exercises in pregnancy. Most complications will be recognized at the time of operation and easily corrected either by the operating surgeon or by seeking assistance from other specialties

scholarly journals Pregnancy complicated by previous cesarean section: a retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4470
Author(s):  
Poornima M.
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Perinatal Morbidity ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
History Of ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: Previous Cesarean section (CS) is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies. Moreover, repeated cesarean sections increase maternal as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality. We conducted this study to find out outcome of pregnancies in women who had a history of previous CS.Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients of previous caesarean section for either maternal or fetal indications. The duration of study was 3 years. Total 215 patients were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The indications, maternal and neonatal outcome were studied from medical records of the patients. Statistical analysis was done using SSPE 22.0 software.Results: Out of 215 studied cases majority of the patients belonged to age group of 21-30 years (75.35%) and were 2nd gravida (61.86%). 164 (76.28%) patients attended ANC OPD at least for 3 times during pregnancy. 73 (33.95%) patients had Hb of less than 10 gms while blood transfusion was required to be given in 11 (5.12%) patients. cesarean section was required in 172 (80%) patients out of which 166 (77.21%) patients had undergone emergency LSCS while in 6 (2.79%) patients elective LSCS was done. Scar tenderness was the most common indication for repeat cesarean section. There was no maternal mortality in any patients while there was 1 still birth and 1 neonatal death.Conclusions: Previous cesarean section is one of the important causes of CS in subsequent pregnancies hence decision of doing CS, especially primigravida, must be taken in accordance with strict guidelines and the practice of “cesarean section on demand” should be discouraged.

scholarly journals Is emergency cesarean section more risky than elective cesarean section in women with previous cesarean section?

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1880
Author(s):  
Balwan Singh Dhillon ◽  
Nomita Chandhiok ◽  
M. Vishnu Vardhana Rao
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Emergency Cesarean Section ◽  
Emergency Cesarean ◽  
Maternal Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most performed surgical procedures all over the world, but unfortunately cesarean sections are associated with a great deal of maternal morbidity and mortality. In the past the rate of cesarean section has increased for many avoidable and unavoidable indications both in developed and developing countries. The objective of this study was to compare maternal morbidity and mortality in elective repeat cesarean section (El-RCS) and emergency repeat cesarean section Em-RCS.Methods: Prospective data was recorded on management practices, associated complications and morbidity and mortality on 15664 consecutive cases of previous cesarean section reporting at 30 medical colleges/teaching hospitals for delivery.Results: Of the 15664 women with a previous cesarean section, 5399 (34.5%) women underwent elective repeat cesarean section, 7752 (49.5%) women who underwent emergency repeat cesarean section and 2513 (16.0%) had successful trial of labor (S-TOL). There was    failed trial of labor (F-TOL) in 1522 cases and requiring an emergency cesarean section for delivery of baby. Therefore, total no. of 7752 women had an emergency cesarean section. The overall maternal morbidity was 22.5%, 20.7% in Em-RCS and El-RCS respectively. Blood loss was more than 1000ml in 7.2% of Em-RCS where as in El-RCS it was 8.8%, blood transfusion was 7.5% in Em-RCS where as it was 6.5% in El-RCS, dehiscence of scar in Em-RCS was 4.7% as compared to 2.2% in El-RCS, uterine rupture was 1.2% in Em-RCS as compared to 0.7 % in El-RCS found statistically significant. Post-operative complication was 5.9% cases in Em-RCS where as in El-RCS was 5.8% (p=0.79 non-significant). Maternal mortality was reported in 12 (0.2%) cases of Em-RCS as compared to 5 (0.1%) cases in El-RCS (p=0.37) which was not statistically significant.  Conclusions: Maternal morbidity was found more in emergency repeat cesarean section than in elective repeat cesarean section. Complications and referral of women who are likely to undergo cesarean section should be diagnosed at an early stage so that the maternal   morbidity and mortality can be prevented. 

scholarly journals Trail of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section: a comparison of morbidity and mortality at tertiary care teaching hospitals in India

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4476
Author(s):  
Balwan Singh Dhillon ◽  
Nomita Chandhiok ◽  
M. Vishnu Vardhana Rao
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Background: As cesarean birth rates continue to rise, more women are faced with the choice of planning a vaginal delivery or a repeat cesarean section after a previous cesarean section. The objective of this prospective study was to study the morbidities and mortality of women attempting a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus elective repeat cesarean section (El-RCS).Methods: Prospective data was recorded on management practices, associated complications and morbidity & mortality for a period of 8 months on 15664 consecutive cases of previous cesarean section reporting at 30 medical colleges/ teaching hospitals for delivery.Results: A trial of labor was planned in 25.8% (4035) women and 34.5% (5399) women underwent elective repeat cesarean section and rest had emergency repeat cesarean section. Overall maternal morbidity due to any cause was 20.7% among El-RCS as compared to 14.2% in TOLAC which was statistically significant (OR: 1.57, CI: 1.41-1.76, P=0.00). Blood loss of more than 1000ml was around 8.0% among TOLAC where as in El-RCS it was 8.8% (OR: 0.89, CI: 0.77-1.94, p=0.14 not statistically significant). Blood transfusion was given in 3.7% in TOLAC where as in El-RCS it was given in 6.5% (OR: 0.56, CI: 0.45-0.68, p=0.00 highly significant).  Complication like dehiscence of scar was similar in both groups. Post-operative complication were seen in 2.8% cases in TOLAC where as in El-RCS it was 5.8% (OR: 0.47, CI: 0.38-0.59, p=0.00 highly significant). Uterine rupture was 0.3% in TOLAC where as in El-RCS it was 0.7% (OR: 0.43, CI: 0.21-0.87, p=0.009 statistically significant). Maternal mortality was reported in 0.2% cases of TOLAC as compared to 0.1% cases in El-RCS (p=0.17) which was not statistically significant.Conclusions: Maternal morbidity was found to be more in elective repeat cesarean section than trial of labor after cesarean section.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Repeat Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (229) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyotshna Sharma ◽  
Sanjeeb Tiwari ◽  
Saraswati M Padhye ◽  
Bidya Mahato
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Previous Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Previous Cesarean

Introduction: Cesarean section is the surgical delivery of a baby through an incision made in the mother's abdomen and uterus. Repeat cesarean section has recently increased, partly because of concern about increased risk of uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Among the women who underwent cesarean section in their first delivery, 80-96% had a second surgical delivery. Therefore, the present study aimed to describe the prevalence of repeat cesarean section among Nepali women presented at Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital who had a previous cesarean section.   Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital from 1st of February to 31st of May 2020. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee of the Kathmandu Medical College. Convenient sampling was done. All pregnant patients between gestational ages of 37-40 weeks with previous cesarean section admitted for safe confinement were included in the study.   Results: Among the 104 women, who had prior cesarean section, 99 (95.19%) had second cesarean section and 5 (4.81%) had vaginal birth after cesarean. The most common indication for the first cesarean section was fetal distress 31 (29.81%) while the indication for the second cesarean section among previously cesarean section women was cephalo pelvic disproportion 39 (39.40%).   Conclusions: The proportion of cesarean section in both first and subsequent delivery is quite high. This high rate may compromise the reproductive future of the women who underwent consecutive cesarean section with possible consequent complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document