The critic’s desire - Lacanian psychoanalysis and the critical theory

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-51
Author(s):  
Seon-Ryeong Cho
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (17) ◽  
pp. 51-77
Author(s):  
Esteban Ruiz Moreno

El psicoanálisis es una praxis que comprende esencialmente lo que Lacan denominó el dispositivo analítico, definido como el dispositivo clínico de escucha del psicoanalista sobre la palabra del psicoanalizado. Sin embargo,el psicoanálisis no se reduce al dispositivo analítico, puesto que se constituye como una poderosa teoría crítica que abarca diferentes fenómenos del lazo social. Un claro ejemplo de lo anterior puede encontrarse en las diferentes obras, tanto de Freud como Lacan, que apuntaban a esclarecer el lazo social. En este sentido, los desarrollos teóricos que efectuó el psicoanalista francés Jacques Lacan son de suma importancia,  al punto de definirse un tipo de psicoanálisis de orientación lacaniana. Como consecuencia de lo anterior, es posible pensar el psicoanálisis en el contexto educativo actual, sobre  el que el psicoanálisis lacaniano ha reflexionado ampliamente a partir de la formalización de la teoría de los cuatrodiscursos, propuesta por Jacques Lacan, de la que se extraen importantes consecuencias, que se intentarán dilucidar a lo largo del artículo.ABSTRACTPsychoanalysis is a practice that comprises essentially what Lacan called the analytic device, defined as the clinical listening device of the psychoanalyst on the word of the individual psychoanalyzed. However, psychoanalysis is not reduced to an analytical device, since it is such a powerful critical theory that encompasses various phenomena of social ties. A clear example of this can be found in the various works of both Freud and Lacan that aimed at clarifying social ties. In  this sense, the theoretical developments made by the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan are paramount to the point of giving rise to a type of psychoanalysis of Lacanian orientation. Because of this, it is possible to think of psychoanalysis in the current educational context, on which Lacanian psychoanalysis has largely reflected from the formalization of the theory of the four discourses, proposed by Jacques Lacan, from which important consequences have been derived, and which will be dealt with throughout the article.RESUMOA psicanálise é uma práxis que compreende esencialmente o que Lacan chama o dispositivo analítico, definido como o dispositivo clínico de escuta do psicanalista sobre a palavra do  psicanalisado. No entanto, a psicanálise não é reducida ao dispositivo analítico, uma vez que se constitui como una poderosa teoria crítica que abrange diferentes fenómenos do laço social. Um exemplo claro disso pode ser encontrada nas diferentes obras, tanto de Freud como Lacan, que teve como objetivo esclarecer o laço social. Neste sentido, os desenvolvimentos teóricos que fez o psicanalista francés Jacques Lacan são fundamentais, a ponto de definir-se um tipo de psicanálise de orientação lacaniana. Como resultado do anterior, é posivel pensar o psicanálise no contexto educacional atual, sobre o que a psicanálise lacaniana se refletiu em grande parte da formalização da teoria dos quatro discursos, proposta por Jacques Lacan , a partir da qual são extraídas importantes consecuências, que vão tentar elucidar ao longo do artigo.


2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (188) ◽  
pp. 453-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Peter Büttner

While the majority of the scientific community holds Marxian Value and Price Theory to be internally inconsistent because of the so-called “transformation problem”, these claims can be sufficiently refuted. The key to the solution of the “transformation problem” is quite simple, so this contribution, because it requires the rejection of simultanism and physicalism, which represent the genuine method of neoclassical economics, a method that is completely incompatible with Marxian Critique of Political Economy. Outside of the iron cage of neoclassical equilibrium economics, Marxian ‘Capital’ can be reconstructed without neoclassical “pathologies” and offers us a whole new world of analytical tools for a critical theory of capitalist societies and its dynamics.


2015 ◽  
Vol 0 (24) ◽  
pp. 95-126
Author(s):  
Ángel Badillo ◽  
◽  
Guillermo Mastrini ◽  
Patricia Marenghi ◽  
◽  
...  

Paragraph ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Trexler

While literary criticism is often seen as an unself-reflective forerunner to literary theory, this article argues that T.S. Eliot's theory of critical practice was a philosophically informed methodology of reading designed to create a disciplinary and institutional framework. To reconstruct this theory, it enriches theoretical methodology with intellectual and institutional history. Specifically, the article argues that Eliot's early critical theory depended on the paradigms of anthropology and occultism, developed during his philosophical investigation of anthropology and Leibniz. From this investigation, Eliot created an occult project that used spiritual monads as facts to progress toward the Absolute. The article goes on to argue that Eliot's methodology of reading was shaped by anthropology's and occultism's paradigms of non-academic, non-specialist reading societies that sought a super-historic position in human history through individual progress. The reconstruction of Eliot's intellectual and institutional framework for reading reveals a historical moment with sharp differences and surprising similarities to the present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document