scholarly journals Does the Choice of Extraction Site During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Change the Incidence of Incisional Hernia? Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Jeremy Meyer ◽  
Constantinos Simillis ◽  
Heman Joshi ◽  
Athanasios Xanthis ◽  
James Ashcroft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Extraction Site ◽  
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 5083-5093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Lee ◽  
Maria Abou-Khalil ◽  
Sender Liberman ◽  
Marylise Boutros ◽  
Gerald M. Fried ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specimen Extraction ◽  
Extraction Site

Real-Time Intraoperative Ureteral Identification in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Mazzarella ◽  
Edoardo Maria Muttillo ◽  
Biagio Picardi ◽  
Stefano Rossi ◽  
Simone Rossi Del Monte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 663-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Batista Rodríguez ◽  
Andrea Balla ◽  
Santiago Corradetti ◽  
Carmen Martinez ◽  
Pilar Hernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Large Databases ◽  
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best “Choice”? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 788-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Riccardo Casadei ◽  
Giovanni Taffurelli ◽  
Carlo Alberto Pacilio ◽  
Marco Ricciardiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis

Enhanced Recovery Programs for Colorectal Surgery and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095484
Author(s):  
Andrés Zorrilla-Vaca ◽  
Gabriel E. Mena ◽  
Juan Cata ◽  
Ryan Healy ◽  
Michael C. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Conventional Care ◽  
Recovery Programs ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Programs ◽  
Postoperative Aki

Background Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) for colorectal surgery bundle evidence-based measures to reduce complications, accelerate postoperative recovery, and improve the value of perioperative health care. Despite these successes, several recent studies have identified an association between ERPs and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between ERPs for colorectal surgery and postoperative AKI. Methodology After conducting a search of major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect), we conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies that reported on the association between ERPs and postoperative AKI. Results Six observational studies (n = 4765 patients) comparing ERP (n = 2140) to conventional care (n = 2625) were included. Overall, ERP patients had a significantly greater odds of developing postoperative AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.00, P = .001) than those who received conventional care. There was no evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test P = 1.0, Egger’s P value = .95). Conclusions Based upon pooled results from observational studies, ERPs are associated with increased odds of developing postoperative AKI compared to conventional perioperative care. The mechanism for this effect is likely multifactorial. Additional research targeting high risk patient populations should evaluate the role of restrictive fluid administration, hemodynamic goals, and scheduled nephrotoxic agents in ERP protocols.

Proctorship in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 186-193
Author(s):  
Assad Zahid ◽  
Danilo Miskovic
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Emerging Technology ◽  
Specific Technique ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
The Past ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Teaching Programs

AbstractTeaching an established surgeon in a novel technique by a colleague who has acquired a level of expertise is often referred to as “proctoring” or “precepting.” Surgical preceptorships can be defined as supervised teaching programs, whereby individual or groups of surgeons (proctors) experienced in a certain technique support a colleague who wants to adopt this technique (sometimes referred to as “delegates” or “preceptees”). Preceptorship programs really focus on a specific technique, technology, or skill which is required to broaden, complement, or transform an established surgeon's practice.Within colorectal surgery, in the past 30 years, there is been an evolution of interventional options including open, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic procedures. With each new emerging technology and technique, safe and effective uptake by established surgeons is best been attained by a period of proctorship by an experienced colleague. Formalizing this has been facilitated largely through industry support. There, however, remains a considerable chasm when it comes to standardization, quality control, and jurisprudence.This article aims to describe the requirements for a contemporary proctorship program, to examine instruments of quality control, and how to improve effectiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document