scholarly journals Nitrogen removal by an activated sludge process with membrane filtration.

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Author(s):  
Yuichi Suwa
1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kayser ◽  
G. Stobbe ◽  
M. Werner

At Wolfsburg for a load of 100,000 p.e., the step-feed activated sludge process for nitrogen removal is successfully in operation. Due to the high denitrification potential (BOD:TKN = 5:1) the effluent total nitrogen content can be kept below 10 mg l−1 N; furthermore by some enhanced biological phosphate removal about 80% phosphorus may be removed without any chemicals.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Nowak ◽  
A. Franz ◽  
K. Svardal ◽  
V. Müller

By means of theoretical considerations and of statistical evaluations, specific organic and nitrogen loads in separately stabilized sludge have been found to be in the range of 16 to 20g VSS/PE/d and of 1.1 to 1.5 g N/PE/d respectively. About 0.6g P/PE/d are removed from the wastewater in activated sludge plants without chemical or enhanced biological P removal. By using the single-stage activated sludge process without primary sedimentation and without separate sludge stabilization, almost complete nitrogen removal can be achieved, but specific organic and nitrogen loads in the waste sludge are up to two times higher than in separately stabilized sludge.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Moretti ◽  
Jean-Marc Choubert ◽  
Jean-Pierre Canler ◽  
Pierre Buffière ◽  
Olivier Pétrimaux ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (11) ◽  
pp. 1607-1626
Author(s):  
Rungrod Jittawattanarat ◽  
Konstantinos Kostarelos ◽  
Eakalak Khan

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUZURU KIMOCHI ◽  
YUHEI INAMORI ◽  
NOBORU FURUYA ◽  
TOICHI EBISUNO ◽  
MASATOSHI MATSUMURA

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oytun Hanhan ◽  
Güçlü Insel ◽  
Nevin Ozgur Yagci ◽  
Nazik Artan ◽  
Derin Orhon

1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Dorias ◽  
Peter Baumann

National and international regulations require a minimum nitrogen removal efficiency of 70% in most public sewage treatment plants. Unlike in activated sludge plants, selective denitrification in trickling filters was not possible until now. Therefore the aim was to employ trickling filter plants for selective denitrification, using innovative technology that involved minimum capital expenditure. For selective denitrification, it is necessary to prevent as much as possible the transfer of oxygen into the trickling filter while feeding the nitrate to be removed, a process similar to upstream denitrification in the activated sludge process. In a test operation conducted in several sewage treatment plants for over a year, the new process with selective denitrification in a covered trickling filter has given successful results. The denitrification efficiency of this system is comparable to that of upstream denitrification in the activated sludge process. Thus, selective denitrification in the trickling filter is a practical alternative to other nitrogen removal processes, while maintaining the established advantages offered by the trickling filter process.


1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1149-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y SUWA ◽  
T SUZUKI ◽  
H TOYOHARA ◽  
T YAMAGISHI ◽  
Y URUSHIGAWA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document