scholarly journals Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann ◽  
Chukwuka Eze ◽  
Minglun Li ◽  
Paul Rogowski ◽  
Christian Schaefer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5548-5548
Author(s):  
Andrei Gafita ◽  
Jeremie Calais ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Manuel Weber ◽  
Hendrik Rathke ◽  
...  

5548 Background: The aim of this international multicenter retrospective analysis was to identify prognostic markers for the clinical outcome in late-stage mCRPC patients treated with 177Lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) radionuclide treatment. Methods: Patients with progressive mCRPC treated with LuPSMA at six centers in Germany, USA, and Australia were considered for inclusion. Eligible patients had 24 predefined, pretherapeutic covariates (demographics, prior mCRPC treatments, and PSMA PET/CT derived parameters) and survival data available. Endpoints included overall survival (OS) and PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). Covariates were tested using univariate and mulitvariate proportional hazards regression Cox models. Results: 267/414 (64%) patients met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. 113 patients participated in clinical trials (ACTRN12615000912583, NCT03042312), while 154 were enrolled in compassionate-access programs. After a median follow-up of 22.5 months, median OS was 13.0 months (95%CI 11.6-14.4); 83% of the patients died. Median PSA-PFS was 4.0 months (95%CI 3.2-4.7). In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with shorter OS were: shorter time since diagnosis of prostate cancer (HR=2.04; p=0.002), lower number of prior systemic therapies (≤3; HR=1.56; p=0.006), prior exposure to chemotherapy (HR=1.42; p=0.05), lower hemoglobin levels (HR=1.13; p=0.002), higher number of lesions (≥20: HR=1.53; p=0.009), multiple sites of metastases (bone/LN only vs. bone + LN; HR=1.39; p=0.03) and visceral involvement (M1c) (HR=1.45; p=0.01). Factors associated with longer PSA-PFS were: longer time since diagnosis of prostate cancer (HR=0.44; p<0.001), higher hemoglobin levels (HR=0.32; p=0.03), presence of pelvic lymph nodes (LN) metastasis (N1) (HR=0.68; p=0.01), no distant lymph node metastases (M1a) (HR=0.66; p=0.01), no skeleton involvement (HR=0.44; p=0.01), no visceral metastases (M1c) (HR=0.51; p<0.001), higher PSMA-positive tumor volume (HR=0.87; p=0.04), and higher SUVmean (HR=0.94; p=0.002). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis identified prognostic factors for survival and treatment response to LuPSMA. Along with the conventional risk factors in mCRPC, PSMA PET/CT can be a useful tool for stratifying patients and guide patient’s selection for LuPSMA radionuclide treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3577-3577
Author(s):  
Wesley R Armstrong ◽  
Pan Thin ◽  
Kathleen Nguyen ◽  
Rejah M. Alano ◽  
Kiara M Booker ◽  
...  

3577 Background: 20 to 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) or definitive radiation therapy (dRT) will experience disease recurrence. However, anatomical recurrence patterns may differ depending on the therapeutic approaches. The aim of this post-hoc retrospective analysis was to investigate if the relapse pattern as assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was different depending on the type of local pelvic therapy (RP, dRT, salvage RT (SRT), pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), pelvic lymph node RT (PLNRT)) in patients with non-metastatic castrate sensitive (nmCS) recurrent disease after primary definitive therapy. Methods: Patients who underwent a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for nmCS PCa recurrent disease after primary definitive therapy were screened from a database of 4 prospective studies (NCT02940262, NCT03515577, NCT04050215, NCT03582774). Patients who underwent primary staging (n = 95), without definitive therapy (n = 68), with known metastatic disease (M1) (n = 68) or with castrate resistant (CR) disease (n = 291) were excluded. We examined the relationship between recurrence patterns as assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (PROMISE criteria) and prior local treatments: i) RP, ii) dRT, iii) RP + SRT. Results: 787 patients were included in the analysis. Positive scan rates were 60%, 94% and 75% in RP, dRT and RP + SRT populations, respectively. Median pre-scan PSA levels were 0.50 (0.02-72.5) ng/ml, 4.4 (0.1-202) ng/ml, and 1.07 (0.04-33) ng/ml for patients who underwent RP (n = 464), dRT (n = 109) and post-RP SRT (n = 214). Median time to first recurrence was 27.7 after RP and 54.6 months after dRT (p = < 0.0001). Patients who underwent RP had lower local recurrence (LR) pattern (T+) rates by PSMA PET than those with dRT (99/464; 21% vs 69/109; 63%; p = < 0.0001). Nodal metastasis (N1) positivity rate was similar between RP and dRT (179/464; 39% vs 43/109; 39%; p = 0.87). Extrapelvic metastasis (M1) positivity rate was lower for RP than dRT (93/464; 20% vs 51/109; 47%; p = < 0.0001). Median time from post-RP SRT to second recurrence was 22.3 months. In patients who had a second recurrence after RP and SRT the positivity rate of LR (T+), N1 disease and M1 disease by PSMA PET/CT was 12% (24/214), 46% (99/214) and 44% (95/214). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with nmCS PCa recurrent disease after primary definitive therapy, the patterns of failure differ based on prior local treatments.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Prasad ◽  
K Huang ◽  
N Czech ◽  
S Prasad ◽  
MR Makowski ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviral Singh ◽  
Harshad Kulkarni ◽  
Richard P. Baum

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Susanne Krome

Schwenck J et al. Intention-to-Treat Analysis of 68Ga-PSMA and 11C-Choline PET/CT Versus CT for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Surgery. J Nucl Med 2019; 60: 1359–1365 15–40 % der Patienten mit einem Prostatakarzinom erleiden postoperativ ein biochemisches Rezidiv. In der retrospektiven Analyse beeinflussten die Bildgebungsverfahren die Häufigkeit einer richtigen Therapiewahl. Die Autoren empfehlen die 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, die die höchste Genauigkeit aufwies. Unter Berücksichtigung der Kosten für inadäquate Behandlungen entstünden keine ökonomischen Nachteile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document