Salvage Radiotherapy Strategy and Its Prognostic Significance for Patients With Locally Recurrent Cervical Cancer After Radical Resection: a Retrospective 10-year Analysis

Background: Salvage radiotherapy modes for treating patients with local cervical cancer recurrence after radical surgery are controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and prognostic significance of two radiotherapy modes—involved-field radiotherapy combined with regional lymph nodes (regional radiotherapy) and involved-field radiotherapy alone (local radiotherapy)—in these patients.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with local recurrence who underwent radical surgery without radiotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer from January 2010 to January 2020. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: Forty-four patients underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based salvage treatment. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 64% and 60.2%, respectively. Sixteen of 18 patients with stump recurrence and 15 of 26 patients with pelvic and abdominal cavity recurrence received regional radiotherapy, while others received local radiotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that patients with stump recurrence, who underwent regional radiotherapy, and with a lower systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) had better prognosis than their counterparts. Patients aged < 51 years, with stump recurrence, recurrence time ≤ 24 months, recurrence site=1, and a lower SIRI who received regional radiotherapy had a better prognosis than patients who received local radiotherapy. SIRI correlated with the recurrence site and radiotherapy mode.Conclusion: Locally recurrent cervical cancer treated with IMRT-based salvage therapy has a good prognosis. Recurrence site, SIRI, and the radiotherapy mode significantly influenced prognosis. Regional radiotherapy may be suitable for patients with stump recurrence, recurrence time ≤ 24 months, and one recurrence site.

Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Salvage Mastectomy for Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundSalvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard surgery for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). However, whether repeat breast-conserving surgery (RBCS) is an alternative method remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of RBCS and SM after IBTR for breast-conserving surgery (BCS).MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley Online and Embase for controlled studies comparing RBCS and SM after IBTR for BCS (published between 1993 and 2019, published in English). Our main endpoints were the secondary local recurrence rate (SLRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR) and overall survival (OS). We used a random-effects model or fixed-effects model for data pooling.ResultsFifteen of the 424 eligible studies were ultimately included, and all studies were retrospective cohort studies (n=2532 participants). 1) SLRR: The SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM (pooled relative rate (pRR) = 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.86, P=0.004). Stratified analysis was performed according to whether radiotherapy was performed after salvage surgery (radiotherapy group: 2ndRT, no radiotherapy group: no-2ndRT), and the following results were revealed: pRR=0.43 (95% CI 0.20-0.95, P=0.04) for group 2ndRT; and pRR=2.30 (95% CI 1.72-3.06, P&lt;0.00001) for group no-2ndRT. These results showed that the main cause of heterogeneity was salvage radiotherapy. 2) DMR: No significant difference in the DMR was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 - 1.01, P=0.05). 3) OS: No significant difference in OS was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR=0.65, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.08, P=0.10).ConclusionsThe SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM for ITBR after BCS, but survival was not affected. RBCS may be used as an alternative for IBTR patients after BCS with strict control for several indications, such as tumor size, recurrence interval and biological behavior, and attaching importance to subsequent salvage radiotherapy and systematic therapy.

A Prospective Study Assessing the Post-Prostatectomy Detection Rate of a Presumed Local Failure at mpMR with Either 64CuCl2 or 64CuPSMA PET/CT

Background: We aimed assess the detection rate (DR) of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with two novel tracers in patients referred for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with a presumed local recurrence at multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: The present prospective study was conducted at a single institution between August 2017 and June 2020. Eligibility criteria were undetectable PSA after RP; subsequent biochemical recurrence (two consecutive PSA rises to 0.2 ng/mL or greater); a presumed local failure at mpMR; no distant metastases at 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT (CH/PET); no previous history of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were offered both 64CuCl2 PET/CT (CU/PET) and 64Cu-PSMA PET/CT (PSMA/PET) before sRT. After image co-registration, PET findings were compared to mpMR ones in terms of DR and independent predictors of DR investigated at logistic regression. Results: A total of 62 patients with 72 nodules at mpMR were accrued. Compared to mpMR (DR = 100%, 95%CI: 94.9–100%), DRs were 47.2% (95%CI: 36.1–58.6%) and 54.4% (95%CI: 42.7–65.7%) for CU/PET and PSMA/PET, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Both experimental PET/CT performed particularly poorly at PSA levels consistent with early sRT. Conclusions: The two novel radiotracers are inferior to mpMR in restaging the prostatic fossa for sRT planning purposes, particularly in the context of early salvage radiotherapy.