scholarly journals Revitalising Democratic Local Governance: Enhancing Citizen Access And Participation Through Smart City

Author(s):  
Agie Nugroho Soegiono ◽  
Sulikah Asmorowati
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 263-283
Author(s):  
Alexandra Flynn ◽  
Mariana Valverde

In May 2020 Sidewalk Labs, the Google-affiliated ‘urban innovation’ company, announced that it was abandoning its ambition to build a ‘smart city’ on Toronto’s waterfront and thus ending its three-year relationship with Waterfront Toronto. This is thus a good time to look back and examine the whole process, with a view to drawing lessons both for the future of Canadian smart city projects and the future of public sector agencies with appointed boards. This article leaves to one side the gadgets and sensors that drew much attention to the proposed project, and instead focuses on the governance aspects, especially the role of the public ‘partner’ in the contemplated public-private partnership. We find that the multi-government agency, Waterfront Toronto, had transparency and accountability deficiencies, and failed to consistently defend the public interest from the beginning (the Request for Proposals issued in May of 2017).  Because the public partner in the proposed ‘deal’ was not, as is usually the case in smart city projects, a municipal corporation, our research allows us to address an important question in administrative law, namely: what powers should administrative bodies outside of government have in crafting smart city policies? In Canada, the comparatively limited Canadian scholarly work regarding urban law and governance has mainly focused on municipal governments themselves, and this scholarly void has contributed to the fact that the public is largely unaware of the numerous local bodies that oversee local matters beyond municipal governments.  This paper hones into the details of the WT-Sidewalk Labs partnership to understand the powers and limitations of WT in assuming a governmental role in establishing and overseeing ‘smart city’ relationships. It ultimately argues that WT has not been – nor should it be – empowered to create a smart city along Toronto’s post-industrial waterfront. Such tasks, we argue, belong to democratic bodies like municipalities. An important contribution of this paper is to situate the evolving role of public authorities in the local governance literature and in the context of administrative law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Leleux ◽  
C. William R. Webster

In 2013, Glasgow City Council received significant funding to develop innovative smart city applications, including the delivery of new electronic public services and the co-production of governance. This case study examines the processes that underpin the ways in which the ‘Future City Glasgow programme’ delivered ‘smart governance’, in the context of a regenerating post-industrial city. We assess the contribution of smart city technologies and data collection and monitoring processes designed to facilitate citizen engagement and sustainable governance practices. The Future City Glasgow programme ran from 2013‒2015, and included the Open Glasgow project, and ‘Demonstrator Projects’ of: Energy Efficiency; Intelligent Street Lighting; Active Travel; and, Integrated Social Transport. Opportunities arose from these demonstrators for developing co-production and legacy initiatives. The case study provides insight into the ways in which citizens and local communities in Glasgow have been engaged in governance processes. This engagement has taken place via traditional and innovative smart city technologies, and in particular in relation to policy formulation, service design and delivery. It finds that the co-creation of governance is shaped by vested interests, that engagement is fragmented and partial, but at the same time new technologies, social media and shared learning opportunities offer innovative new ways for <em>some</em> citizens to influence local governance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lim Seng Boon ◽  
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek ◽  
Mohd Yusof Hussain ◽  
Zurinah Tahir

Public participation is gaining popularity in local governance practices where the involvement of the public in the decision-making process is essential in promoting good governance concepts. However, local authorities are facing challenges in guiding public involvement in e-government services such as smart city programmes. Hence, this paper aimed to examine the participation process in e-government services and smart city programmes, and later to recommend a framework to assess participation level and process in local context. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, was selected as a case study where interviews and observations were conducted with thematic analysis based on relevant themes. Through the selected attributes and designated questions in the participation framework, time and effort can be saved in addition to clearing the ambiguities of stakeholders who are keen on gaining the authentic participation culture in e-services and smart city programmes. This study has provided new insights on how e-government can be implemented by the local government after adopting a smart city policy in the context of public participation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Lange ◽  
Jörg Knieling

The concept of the smart city has become increasingly popular in recent years and a large number of cities globally follow smart city strategies. By awarding subsidies in the Horizon 2020 programme, the European Union (EU) has taken on an influential role in how smart city projects are conceived and implemented in European municipalities. Using the example of the smart city pilot project mySMARTLife in Hamburg, the purpose of this article is to examine the area of tension between strategically pursuing own objectives and adjustment to external provisions of the EU funding framework. In a qualitative single case study, the article analyses what implications the project mySMARTLife has on urban development practice and local governance arrangements in Hamburg. Examining current literature on smart cities from the perspective of multi-level governance and presenting the current state of research dealing with EU smart city projects, a theoretical framework is developed. The analysis reveals that, due to the EU funding framework, precise project contents are contractually defined at an early stage when local stakeholders have limited involvement in this process. Furthermore, the analysis shows that the EU smart city funding in the project mySMARTLife is more limited to the implementation of individual interventions than to a comprehensive smart city strategy. As a result, this article considers EU-funded smart city initiatives as experimental fields that enable cities to gain experiences that can be incorporated into local strategic development objectives.


2020 ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
L.O. Zhylinska ◽  
◽  
H.Yu. Kucherova ◽  
O.V. Tarasevych ◽  
◽  
...  

The issues of restoration and development of living conditions in post-conflict territories through the application of the concept of “SMART-city” are highlighted. The effectiveness of the SMART approach to local governance and the promotion of dynamic urban development has been proven. To determine the feasibility of applying the development of the concept of “SMART-city” to the tasks of restoration and development of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, the problematic issues and conditions in which their life processes take place are highlighted. A schematic representation of the logical interrelationships of the structural elements of the concept of Smart city of directions of restoration, development of spheres of life of cities in post-conflict territories is presented. It was determined that the concept of “SMART-city” is based on the interaction of 6 basic structural elements: smart economy, mobile access, smart environment, smart housing, progressive people, modern management, which fully ensures a guaranteed solution to the problems of restoration and development of the spheres of life of cities on post-conflict territories. It has been determined that the processes of implementation and development of the “SMART-city” concept are only gaining momentum around the world, therefore, modern strategic documents of territorial and national development should be revised in terms of integration and correlation with the principles of “SMART-cities” development. Some available mechanisms for implementing the Smart city concept are given. It is argued that the orientation of city management towards the concept of “SMART-city” will allow changing the status of territories from post-conflict and subsidized to “smart” without going through intermediate stages of recovery and development, which, on the one hand, requires much more funding, on the other, minimizes the time spent on recovery and will accelerate the receipt of future income, expand development prospects.


Author(s):  
Tomila V. Lankina ◽  
Anneke Hudalla ◽  
Hellmut Wollmann

Author(s):  
Rosaria Battarra ◽  
Carmela Gargiulo ◽  
Rosa Anna la Rocca ◽  
Laura Russo
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document