The purpose of the research is to improve the methodological approach to assessing the financial security of the region in the context of decentralization, which, unlike the existing ones, makes it possible to determine the ways of ensuring the financial security of the regions through an integrated assessment of the contribution of individual factors and types of regulation to the final state of the financial security of the territories. Methodology. The methodological approach to the assessment of the financial security of the region under decentralization has been improved based on the application of normalization of the system of indicators and construction of integral indices by the type of impact indicator (exogenous or endogenous) and factors: decentralization, socio-economic status and fiscal policy of the regions. Individual time series have been identified and evaluated for each of these integrated indicators. Results. Based on the research, the methodological approach to the assessment of the financial security of the region under decentralization conditions has been improved, which makes it possible to determine the ways of ensuring the financial security of the regions by assessing the contribution of individual factors and types of regulation to the financial security. These individual contributions are grouped together to reflect the type of impact indicator (exogenous or endogenous) and factors such as decentralization, socio-economic status and fiscal policies of the regions. The categories of integrated indicators proposed in the article are useful for monitoring financial security drivers, making it clear what affects the financial security of a country under decentralization, how systemic events in the process of decentralization affect the financial security of regions over time. Practical meaning. The research identified three groups of regions of Ukraine in terms of their financial security: financially secure regions, which during the entire observation period were ascertained: a high integral financial security index (Dnipropetrovsk, Kyiv regions) and a sufficient integral financial security index (Lviv, Zaporizhzhya, Odesa, Poltava and Kharkiv regions); financially unstable regions where there is a potential for strengthening financial security (Vinnytsia, Donetsk, Kirovohrad, Mykolaiv, Cherkasy regions), but there is also a likelihood of aggravation of a negative financial situation (Ivano-Frankivsk, Zhytomyr, Sumy, Kherson, Khmelnytsky, Chernihiv regions); financially dangerous regions, which are dependent on state support, are not able to independently fulfill the majority of delegated to the local level of authority and to finance the economic development of the region (Volyn, Luhansk, Transcarpathian, Rivne, Ternopil, Chernivtsi regions). Therefore, the advantage of using this system of integrated indicators is that they give the developers of national regional policy and internal regional policy an up-to-date picture of the financial security situation in the region, wider than that provided only by some unsystematic indicators. Prospects for further research. The prospect for further research should be to improve methodological support for the financial security of Ukrainian regions.
Application of Regional Financial Security Index in China
