scholarly journals Entrepreneurship Competency Training Model of Private High School Principal Through Knowledge-Based Economy Approach

Author(s):  
Asep Sujana ◽  
Aan Komariah
2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Lee Alvoid

What is the status of ambitious national recommendations designed to develop the talent of our brightest students? Have states, districts, and individual schools taken action? Are we much further along as a nation in raising the expectation level for gifted and talented students? As a former middle and high school principal, I have pictures of specific students in mind when I contemplate these answers. There has been progress, but not nearly enough has been accomplished.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-76
Author(s):  

Here is . . . part of a message a Houston high school principal recently sent to the parent of a pupil: "Our school's cross-graded multi-ethnic, individualized learning program is designed to enhance the concept of an open-ended learning program with emphasis on a continuum of multi-ethnic, academically enriched learning using the identified intellectually gifted child as the agent or director of his own learning. "Major emphasis is on cross-graded, multi-ethnic learning with the main objective being to learn respect for the uniqueness of a person." The parent wrote back. "I have a college degree, speak two foreign languages and four Indian dialects, have been to a number of county fairs and three goat ropings, but I haven't th Submitted by Studente faintest idea as to what the hell you are talking about. Do you?"


Author(s):  
Judy Smith ◽  
Mimi Wilson

In 1977, when the OC program was brand-new, and for a number of years thereafter, we shared the excitement and the work, both as parents and as teachers. We are now living in different states, working in very different kinds of schools. Judy is a high school principal in a large public high school in Washington State. Mimi is a fourth-grade teacher in an independent school in South Carolina that is associated with a major school-restructuring initiative (the Coalition of Essential Schools). In our efforts to contribute to reform in our classrooms and schools, we find that we are returning, about 20 years later, to the basic philosophy that directed our OC experience. In many ways, what we learned in the OC, both in terms of instructional practices and in terms of change processes, is giving us the confidence we need to proceed in our new settings. Personal experiences and the general principles of the OC—along with increasingly compelling research about how children learn that questions the way schools are traditionally organized and how we think about curriculum and instruction—have helped us organize and promote new programs on both sides of the country. The changes we are working on are not simple ones. We are looking at ways to integrate across disciplines, combining English, physics, and history into an integrated block. Instead of chopping school days into isolated blocks of time, we are exploring ways of lengthening these blocks of time and trying more flexible schedules. We are looking at designing work for children that covers fewer things in greater depth, through more focused inquiry. Believing that children will learn better if they can make connections, we seek ways to challenge students not just to memorize material but to apply it as well. We are working to make it possible for individual students to carry out research and to present their work before a critical audience. These changes have the potential to challenge the sacrosanct purpose of most schools: to prepare students for the next level and to get them into colleges.


1918 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 641-653
Author(s):  
Charles H. Judd

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document