scholarly journals A Comparative Study of China and Russia Cultural Influence on their Foreign Policy & Diplomacy—From the Perspective of the Function of Culture

Author(s):  
Yuxin Gong
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-64
Author(s):  
Joel Petersson Ivre ◽  
Eugene Lee

By treating militarism and personalism as institutional constraints on foreign policy, this article examines the role and influence of these constraints on the foreign policies of Russia and China. By looking at empirical evidence the authors argue that domestic institutional constraints in each country have exhibited distinctly different patterns throughout the last twenty years, and this can to some extent explain the difference in their respective foreign policies. However, institutional personalism in China has recently become more similar to that of Russia. The authors argue that current Russian foreign policy bears some elements of similarity suggesting future developments in Chinese foreign policy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 37-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Criekemans

Regions are nowadays generating an increasing amount of diplomatic activity, both in quantitative and qualitative terms. This article studies the emergence of regional sub-state entities as diplomatic actors, and an in-depth comparative study is made of the external relations of Quebec, Scotland, Bavaria, Catalonia, Wallonia and Flanders. The following dimensions are studied: (1) the definition of foreign policy; (2) the diplomatic instruments that are utilized; (3) the organizational structure and operation of foreign affairs; and (4) the character of the representations abroad. Based upon a comparative study of the empirical data, the article argues that boundaries between diplomacy (as generated by states) and sub-state diplomacy are visibly watering down.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document