scholarly journals A Philosophical Orientation: Judges Decision for Good Faith Land Sale and Purchase Cases in Indonesia

Author(s):  
Albertus Usada ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani ◽  
Lego Karjoko
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Widodo Dwi Putro ◽  
Ahmad Zuhairi

ABSTRAKSengketa jual beli tanah dalam perkara ini menyeret pihak penjual yang telah menjual objek yang sama kepada dua pembeli dalam dua kali transaksi. Pembeli kedua (penggugat) melayangkan gugatannya terhadap pembeli pertama (tergugat II). Posisi hukumnya dilematis. Kedua pembeli sama-sama merasa mempunyai hak atas tanah sengketa karena telah membeli objek yang sama dari penjual. Untuk membuktikan siapa pembeli yang berhak, hakim perlu mempertimbangkan asas "iktikad baik" (good faith), sebagai dasar untuk menentukan pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum. Permasalahannya, kedua pembeli sama-sama mengklaim dirinya adalah pembeli yang beriktikad baik. Sehingga, untuk menilai siapa pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum, hakim berpegangan pada prinsip duty of care, dengan mempertimbangkan siapa pembeli yang berhati-hati dan cermat memeriksa data yuridis dan data fisik sebelum dan saat jual beli dilakukan. Prinsip duty of care ini bersifat abstrak, maka metode penulisan yang digunakan, menelusuri dan mengkaji pendapat para ahli hukum perdata dan agraria untuk didialogkan dengan putusan-putusan hakim. Perkembangan putusan-putusan pengadilan mengenai pembeli beriktikad baik yang mengadopsi prinsip duty of care, seharusnya menjadi 'pegangan' para hakim dalam menangani kasus yang serupa, untuk menilai kapan pembeli dikategorikan sebagai pembeli beriktikad baik.Kata kunci: iktikad baik, perlindungan hukum, duty of care, data yuridis dan fisik.ABSTRACTThe dispute of land sale and purchase in this case drag the seller who had sold the same object to two buyers in two transactions. The second buyer (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the first buyer (defendant II). Its legal standing created a dilemma. Both buyers felt equally entitled to be the owner of the disputed land, which is the same object purchased from the seller. In providing evidence of the most eligible buyer, the judge should take into consideration the principle of "good faith" as the basis for determining the buyer deserving legal protection. The problem is that both buyers claimed that they were buyers of good faith. Therefore, to appraise which buyer deserving the legal protection, the judges adhered to principle of "duty of care" by taking into account which one of them was carefully and meticulously reading-through the juridical and physical data prior to and during the sale and purchase of the land was conducted. Given the abstract nature of the principle of "duty of care" the analysis method used in this discussion is exploring and studying the opinions of the experts of civil and agrarian law as to be juxtaposed with the decisions of the judges. The development of court decisions related to the issue of good faith buyers adopting the principle of "duty of care" should serve as a reference for the judges in handling similar cases to determine a good faith buyer.Keywords: good faith, legal protection, duty of care, juridical and physical data.


Author(s):  
Ashar Sinilele

AbstractArticle 1338 paragraph 3 of the Civil Code, states that an agreement must be carried out in good faith. Good faith when making an agreement means honesty, then good faith in the implementation stage, namely, the agreement is appropriateness, namely an assessment of the behavior of a party in implementing what was agreed. In the sale and purchase agreement, especially the sale and purchase of land, it is hoped that a balance can be created between the two parties concerned, one of which is good faith between each other which is also expected to create a conducive atmosphere. According to article 1362 of the Civil Code and Article 1383 of the Civil Code, there is a difference between the presence or absence of good faith on the party receiving the payment. Article 1360 of the Civil Code, states that whoever, in good faith, has received something that does not have to be paid to him, is obliged to return it with interest and the proceeds, calculated from the payment and thus does not reduce the compensation for costs, losses and interest, if the price is already suffer a slump. If his goods have been destroyed, even though this happens beyond his fault, then he is obliged to pay the price accompanied by compensation for interest, loss and price, unless he can prove that the goods were also destroyed, if he is in the person to whom he should have been given.  Keywords: Agreement, Good Faith, Land, Sale and Purchase. AbstrakPasal 1338 ayat 3 KUH Perdata, menyatakan bahwa suatu perjanjian harus dilaksanakan dengan itikad baik. Itikad baik pada waktu membuat suatu perjanjian berarti kejujuran, maka itikad baik dalam tahap pelaksanaan yaitu, perjanjian adalah kepatutan yaitu suatu penilaian terhadap tindak tanduk suatu pihak dalam hal melaksanakan apa yang diperjanjikan. Dalam perjanjian jual-beli terkhususnya jual-beli tanah sangatlah diharapakan dapat tercipta keseimbangan antar kedua belah pihak yang bersangkutan, salah satunya itikad baik antar sesama yang juga diharapkan dapat tercipta suasana yang kondusif. Menurut pasal 1362 KUH Perdata dan pasal 1383 KUH Perdata dibedakan antara ada atau tidaknya itikad baik dipihak yang menerima pembayaran. Pasal 1360 KUH Perdata, menyatakan bahwa siapa yang dengan itikad baik, telah menerima sesuatu yang tidak harus dibayarkan kepadanya, diwajibkan mengembalikan dengan bunga dan hasil-hasilnya, terhitung dari hasil pembayaran dan demikian itu tidak mengurangi penggantian biaya, rugi dan bunga, jika harganya telah menderita kemerosotan. Jika barangnya telah musnah, meskipun ini terjadi diluar salahnya, maka ia wajib membayar harganya dengan disertai penggantian bunga, rugi dan harga, terkecuali jika ia dapat membuktikan bahwa barang itu musnah juga, seandainya ia berada pada orang kepada siapa ia seharusnya diberikan.Kata Kunci : Itikad Baik, Jual Beli, Perjanjian, Tanah.


Author(s):  
Ashar Sinilele

In article 1338 of the Civil Code of paragraph 3, namely: "An agreement shall be executed in good faith." A treaty at the commencement of the implementation of the treaty and at the time of execution of the original agreement, especially in the case of land sale agreements, parties who are well-meaning and act honest and compliance with applicable rules, must receive fair treatment and protection of the law by not forgetting the purpose of the rule of law in order to create a balance between the various interests concernedKeywords: good faith, buying and selling landDalam pasal 1338 KUH Perdata ayat 3, yaitu : “Suatu perjanjian harus dilaksanakan dengan itikad baik.” Suatu perjanjian pada waktu dimulainya pemberlakuan perjanjian maupun pada waktu pelaksanaan perjanjian jula-beli terutama dalam hal perjanjian jual-beli tanah, pihak yang beritikad baik dan bertindak jujur serta berkepatuhan akan aturan yang berlaku, haruslah mendapat perlakuan dan perlindungan hukum yang seadil-adilnya dengan tidak melupakan akan tujuan dari peraturan hukum tersebut agar tercipta keseimbangan antara berbagai kepentingan yang bersangkutanKata kunci : itikad baik, jual-beli tanah


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debora Tambunan ◽  
Hulman Panjaitan ◽  
L. Elly. Pandiangan

Moreana ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (Number 176) (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76
Author(s):  
Joshua Avery
Keyword(s):  

This study draws upon the Platonic dialogue tradition as a background for interpreting the conversation between More and his daughter Margaret Roper, as depicted in Margaret’s letter to Alice Alington. With an eye to the famously ironic Socrates, this article will propose the interpretation of a puzzling statement regarding More’s apparent good faith in the sincerity of others who have reversed their positions regarding the problematic oath. Is More expressing ironic distance or straightforward charity in his ambiguous language? The argument is that More, utilizing his legal and literary skills, carefully crafts a rhetoric that paradoxically joins remarkable charity with worldly-wise irony.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-84
Author(s):  
Slavomír Halla

Abstract Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is a dis­pute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus on extension doctrines which might be less known even to a professional audience: piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel & group of companies. A review of selected case law leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analysis is defi­nitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document