scholarly journals To Solve the Load of Beam by Shearing Force Diagram and Bending Moment Diagram??"Reverse Thinking in Strength of Materials

Author(s):  
Hengwen Zhang ◽  
Yue Shen ◽  
Senwei Zhang
2014 ◽  
Vol 488-489 ◽  
pp. 546-549
Author(s):  
Heng Wen Zhang ◽  
Yue Shen ◽  
Sen Wei Zhang

The paper has a discussion of forward problem and inverse problem for beams in strength of materials. Known load case of a beam can certainly determine its shearing force diagram and bending moment diagram, but conversely, there may be a variety of statically determinate or statically indeterminate constraint conditions. Furthermore, the solution from statically indeterminate constraint conditions doesnt agree with the given shearing force diagram and bending moment diagram in a general way.


1990 ◽  
pp. 10-20
Author(s):  
D.H. Bacon ◽  
R.C. Stephens

2011 ◽  
Vol 71-78 ◽  
pp. 3275-3279
Author(s):  
Xiao Na Li ◽  
Tong Chun Li ◽  
Yuan Ding

This paper takes a sluice reconstruction project as an example. The constraint internal force, the related axis force, bending moment, and shearing force at the corresponding section are solved according to the unit stress and internal force balance. Furthermore, technology of mesh auto-generation in cross-section is utilized to plot the internal force graph of the structure directly, which will provide reference for reinforcement design and make it more convenient.


2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Stephen

The Macaulay bracket notation is familiar to many engineers for the deflection analysis of a Euler–Bernoulli beam subject to multiple or discontinuous loads. An expression for the internal bending moment, and hence curvature, is valid at all locations along the beam, and the deflection curve can be calculated by integrating twice with respect to the axial coordinate. The notation obviates the need for matching of multiple constants of integration for the various sections of the beam. Here, the method is extended to a Timoshenko beam, which includes the additional deflection due to shear. This requires an additional expression for the shearing force, also valid at all locations along the beam.


1971 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 1268-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Dadeppo ◽  
Robert Schmidt

Deflections and stress resultants are calculated for hinged-hinged circular arches subjected to a horizontal point load at the crown. The underlying theory is based on the Bernoulli-Euler hypothesis. The magnitudes of deflections are unrestricted. The solutions are expressed in terms of Legendre’s elliptic integrals of the first and second kind. Calculated results are presented in graphical form. These include deflected configurations and load-deflection curves, as well as normal force, shearing force, and bending moment diagrams for arches with three different subtending angles and three different values of the applied load on each arch.


1911 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
E. M. Horsburgh

The important relation in the Theory of Bending between the curves of Bending Moment (B.M.), Shearing Force (S.F.), and Load, or between those of Deflection, Slope, and Bending Moment, viz., that the tangents to the first of either set intersect in a vertical line through the centroid of the corresponding area of the last, under the usual convention of drawing, is usually not proved in Engineering Treatises, or else is established in simple cases by the polygon of loads.


1967 ◽  
Vol 133 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-7,45
Author(s):  
YOSHITSURA YOKOO ◽  
MINORU WAKABAYASHI ◽  
YASUYOSHI SUENAGA

1969 ◽  
pp. 285-297
Author(s):  
G. D. Redford ◽  
J. G. Rimmer ◽  
D. Titherington

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document