scholarly journals The potential role of pedagocial documentation in Italian early education during the Coronavirus pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Antonietti ◽  
Monica Guerra ◽  
Elena Luciano
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Pedagogical Documentation ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Education And Care ◽  
Inclusive Processes

The practice of pedagogical documentation in the field of early childhood education and care in Italy has a long and significant tradition, starting in 1991 up to the most recent documents. The pandemic emergency and recent lockdowns in Italy are an invitation to focus attention on this theme for two main reasons: the documentation practice is indicated as functional to inclusive processes; the documenting practices of teachers and educators are changing. This paper discusses the results emerging from an explorative study carried out on the experience of distance education during the lockdown in Italy in in the context of 0-6 years early childhood education and care services collecting the opinion of 412 teachers, educators and coordinators through a questionnaire. In particular, the focus of this study will be on documentation practices through a descriptive analysis of closed answers and a content analysis of open questions. This allows to make the resilient beauty

Parent Choice of Early Childhood Education and Care Services

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Noble
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Social Context ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Theory Analysis ◽  
Parent Choice ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Education And Care

THIS PAPER REPORTS ON A STUDY designed to enhance knowledge and understanding of parent choice in relation to early childhood education and care (ECEC) services. It investigates the ways parents make their choices of early childhood services and examines and interprets the meanings they ascribe to those choices. An orthodox grounded theory analysis of interviews with parents was conducted to elicit the knowledge bases parents draw on as they make judgements about the early childhood services they access for their children. This investigation informs ECEC professionals about the variations in the ways parents make choices for their young children. Specifically, there is a strong sense of the influence of social context and existing beliefs and understandings. However, equally importantly, parent choice is also strongly influenced by more pragmatic concerns. Therefore, choice of ECEC service is both complex and pragmatic.

Trust, Empathy and Time: Relationship Building with Families Experiencing Vulnerability and Disadvantage in Early Childhood Education and Care Services

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Education And Care

THIS ARTICLE IDENTIFIES some key enablers and barriers in early childhood education and care (ECEC) environments in Australia encountered by early childhood educators and professionals (ECEPs) and by the children and their families experiencing vulnerability and disadvantage. Improving educational outcomes can change the cycle of disadvantage for children and their families. This research asks both the providers and users of services concurrently about what they think is important and effective. This qualitative case study used Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to analyse semi-structured interview data gathered from 30 families and their children and 33 qualified ECEPs. The research focused on the enablers and barriers around social inclusion, access, participation and engagement at the different levels of system, service, children and their families, and ECEPs. The study found that the participant groups shared an understanding that empathy, trust and time proved key to relationship building as a starting point in addressing some of the key barriers. Social inclusion, access, participation and engagement are key to early learning success in early childhood—a time integral to overall health, wellbeing and future role in society. This study has led to the development of a new model for engagement and relationship building.

Implicating teachers in infant–peer relationships: Teacher answerability through alteric acts

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridgette Redder ◽  
E Jayne White
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Early Childhood Education ◽  
Peer Relationships ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Childhood Education ◽  
Peer Experiences ◽  
Education And Care ◽  
Dialogic Space

While academic attention is now being paid to infant–peer relationships in early childhood education and care settings and the role of teachers in these interactions, research is inclined to emphasise the importance of shared understanding as a feature in infant–peer relationships. As such, little research attention has been given to the alteric potential of the teacher when she or he engages in infant–peer relationships. This article draws on a dialogic analysis of infants in a New Zealand early childhood education and care setting to argue that infant relationships with their peers can be radically altered by the presence and participation of teachers. The results highlight the pivotal role of the teacher as a connecting figure within and between infant–peer experiences – one that has the potential to significantly impact on the nature of relationships between infants and peers. The study highlights the alteric potential for teachers within infant–peer dialogues, and the significance of these engagements accordingly, and concludes by suggesting that teachers are fully implicated in infant–peer relationships, since the dialogic space posits that there is no alibi!

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document