scholarly journals Cryptogenic Stroke: A Challenge in Diagnosis and Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidhi Laksono Purwowiyoto ◽  
Budhi Setianto ◽  
Gea Panindhita ◽  
Reynaldo Halomoan ◽  
I Nyoman Wiryawan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cardiac Structure ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Advanced Knowledge ◽  
Pfo Closure

Ischemic stroke is responsible for 85% of all stroke globally. However, the etiology of around a quarter of ischemic stroke are undetermined, this is called cryptogenic stroke. This kind of stroke affects younger population. Several mechanism are associated with the incidence of cryptogenic stroke such as paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, patent foramen ovale, atherosclerosis, and atrial cardiopathy. Despite many advanced knowledge on stroke generally, cryptogenic stroke is still a challenge in clinical settings. To understand more about cryptogenic stroke, a new term of embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) is proposed and may need a specific workup. Specific workup aims to detect any silent risk factors and also to evaluate the cardiac structure. The term of ESUS also leads to the understanding that cryptogenic stroke is highly related to embolic mechanism and anticoagulation administration might benefit the patients. However, the result of several recent studies showed that anticoagulant was not superior to antiplatelet, and antiplatelet is still the preferred treatment. Studies on PFO closure also shows different result, but the majority of the trials showed benefit of PFO closure in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence.

Abstract P702: How Many Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Should Be Candidates for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka Mitsumura ◽  
Tomomichi Kitagawa ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Takeo Sato ◽  
Hiroki Takatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Ischemic Lesion ◽  
Pfo Closure

Background and Purpose: Recent several studies demonstrated that percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure reduced the risk of stroke recurrence for patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) and PFO. Our aim of this retrospective study is to survey the frequency of CS, which can be an indication of PFO closure. Methods: Subjects were consecutive stroke patients with symptomatic ischemic lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Of them, CS were extracted according to exclusion of small-vessel collusion, large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, definite case of aortogenic embolism, and distinctive causeof ischemic stroke such as arterial dissection, hypercoagulable state and so on. After that, we selected patients in accordance with clinical guideline of PFO closure recommended by the Japanese Stroke Association (Figure). We analyzed the prevalence of CS with right-to-left shunt (RLS) as a good and recommended candidates for PFO closure. Results: Among 1,374 ischemic stroke patients from October 2012 to September 2019 , CS were 240 patients (83 females, mean age of 66 years, 17% of subjects). Of them, 100 patients (42%) had RLS (PFO; 65, atrial septal defect; 1, pulmonary arteriovenous fistula; 1, positive on transcranial Doppler (not performed in TEE) including 21 cases of definite of paradoxical embolism. In 65 patients of CS with PFO, 30 patients younger than 60 years (13% of CS) were good candidates for PFO closure. Moreover, 22 of 1,374 (1.6%) patients who were recommended candidates had one or more high risk factors of PFO, for example large shunt, atrial septal aneurysm, and the presence of shunt at rest (Figure). Conclusions: In our preliminary survey, 2% of acute ischemic stroke should be PFO closure candidates.

scholarly journals Five Year Follow-Up of Cryptogenic Stroke Patients Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Agnete Teivāne ◽  
Kristaps Jurjāns ◽  
Ainārs Rudzītis ◽  
Krista Lazdovska ◽  
Artūrs Balodis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Residual Shunt ◽  
Amplatzer Occluder ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Pfo Closure

Background and Objectives: According to guidelines, patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Paradoxial embolism from PFO-mediated right to left shunt has been described as the mechanism of stroke in these cases. The aim of the study was to determine whether PFO closure can be associated with improvement of complaints (headaches, fatigue, heart palpitations, dizziness, and visual impairment) and determine its long-term effectiveness on recurrent stroke risk reduction. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in a retrospective study and followed-up by phone up to five years after PFO closure. Standardized survey was conducted about their well-being, recurrent cerebrovascular events, and the use of prescribed medication. Patients were also followed up for residual shunts 24 h, 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years after PFO. The pathogenic ischemic stroke subtypes are determined using CCS (Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke). Results: Male patients accounted for 43.7% (n = 45). The mean age was—44.4 ± 13 (18–75). The most probable cause for cryptogenic stroke for 53.4% (n = 55) of patients with possible cardio-aortic embolism was PFO. Residual shunts were mostly observed in patients with Amplatzer occluder—87.5% (n = 14). There was correlation between residual shunt and increased risk of transient ischemic attack recurrence (p = 0.067). Five-years after PFO closure recurrent cerebrovascular events were reported in only 5.1% (n = 5) of patients, this difference is statistically relevant (p < 0.001). Out of 51 patients presented with complaints before PFO closure, 25.5% (n = 13) did not present with any complaints after PFO closure. Conclusions: PFO can be considered a possible risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure is effective in reducing recurrent cerebrovascular events. Residual shunt after PFO closure increases the risk of transient ischemic attack recurrence. Amplatzer occluder device is associated with a higher risk for residual shunts after PFO closure. PFO closure can be associated with improvement of complaints.

Abstract 170: Role of Patent Foramen Ovale in First and Recurrent Childhood Cryptogenic Arterial Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn K Shih ◽  
Shobha Natarajan ◽  
Christine Falkensammer ◽  
Lauren A Beslow ◽  
Steven R Messe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Arterial Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Retrospective Case

Background: Numerous studies in adults have reported a robust association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), particularly in younger adults. The association between PFO and stroke in children has not been well characterized and the clinical significance of identifying a PFO in a child with first or recurrent cryptogenic stroke is currently unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective case control analysis of a 10-year prospectively enrolled cohort of children with acute AIS who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as part of their diagnostic evaluation. We compared PFO prevalence in children with cryptogenic stroke to those with known stroke etiologies and to non-stroke controls. We also assessed stroke recurrence risk in children with vs without PFO and assessed PFO features that may confer higher stroke risk. Results: Of 119 children with first-ever AIS, 59 had TTE available for central review, of which 17 were cryptogenic and 42 had a known cause. PFO prevalence was higher in the cryptogenic stroke group (X, 24%) compared to both the known stroke etiology group (Y, 6%, p = 0.05) and non-stroke controls (Z, 8%, p = 0.05). However, 2 year recurrence free survival rates in stroke patients with PFO did not differ from those without PFO (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.18-13.62, p = 0.68). PFOs in children with AIS vs controls had numerically more right-to-left shunt at rest (7 vs 0) and atrial septal aneurysm (4 vs 0) but the study was underpowered to look at these factors. Conclusions: In our prospectively enrolled cohort of children with AIS, we found the prevalence of PFO to be higher in children with cryptogenic stroke compared to healthy controls and non-cryptogenic stroke patients. The implication of PFO for risk of recurrence and optimal secondary preventative treatment remains uncertain and require further study.

scholarly journals Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: To Close or Not to Close? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 193-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Lattanzi ◽  
Francesco Brigo ◽  
Claudia Cagnetti ◽  
Mario Di Napoli ◽  
Mauro Silvestrini
Keyword(s):  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Pfo Closure ◽  
New Onset

Background: The optimal strategy of secondary stroke prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) is controversial. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device closure (DC) versus the medical therapy (MT) in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and PFO. Summary: Randomized controlled trials with active and control groups receiving the DC plus MT and MT alone in patients with history of cryptogenic stroke/TIA and diagnosis of PFO were systematically searched. The main efficacy outcome was stroke recurrence. Subgroup-analyses were performed according to age, shunt size, and presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). Safety endpoints included any serious adverse event (SAE), atrial fibrillation (AF), and major bleeding complications. Risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. Five trials were included, involving 3,440 participants (DC = 1,829, MT = 1,611). There was a protective effect of closure in the risk of recurrent stroke (RR 0.43 [0.21–0.90]; p = 0.024; HR = 0.39 [0.19–0.83]; p = 0.014). The benefit of PFO closure was significant in patients with PFO associated with substantial right-to-left shunt or ASA. There were no differences in the risks of SAEs and major bleedings between the groups. The rate of new-onset AF was higher in the DC than in the MT arm (RR 4.46 [2.35–8.41]; p < 0.001). Successful device implantation and effective PFO closure were achieved in 96 and 91% of the patients respectively. Key Messages: In selected adult patients with PFO and history of cryptogenic stroke, the DC plus MT is more effective to prevent stroke recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of new-onset AF compared to the MT alone.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e023761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Mir ◽  
Reed Alexander C Siemieniuk ◽  
Long Cruz Ge ◽  
Farid Foroutan ◽  
Michael Fralick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
External Evidence ◽  
Pfo Closure

ObjectiveTo examine the relative impact of three management options in patients aged <60 years with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale (PFO): PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone and anticoagulation alone.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) supported by complementary external evidence.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing PFO closure and/or medical therapies in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.Review methodsWe conducted an NMA complemented with external evidence and rated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.ResultsTen RCTs in eight studies proved eligible (n=4416). Seven RCTs (n=3913) addressed PFO closure versus medical therapy. Of these, three (n=1257) addressed PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy, three (n=2303) addressed PFO closure versus mixed antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies and one (n=353) addressed PFO closure versus anticoagulation. The remaining three RCTs (n=503) addressed anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy. PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy probably results in substantial reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence (risk difference per 1000 patients over 5 years (RD): −87, 95% credible interval (CrI) −100 to −33; moderate certainty). Compared with anticoagulation, PFO closure may confer little or no difference in ischaemic stroke recurrence (low certainty) but probably has a lower risk of major bleeding (RD −20, 95% CrI −27 to −2, moderate certainty). Relative to either medical therapy, PFO closure probably increases the risk of persistent atrial fibrillation (RD 18, 95% CI +5 to +56, moderate certainty) and device-related adverse events (RD +36, 95% CI +23 to +50, high certainty). Anticoagulation, compared with antiplatelet therapy, may reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke recurrence (RD −71, 95% CrI −100 to +17, low certainty), but probably increases the risk of major bleeding (RD +12, 95% CrI −5 to +65, moderate certainty).ConclusionsIn patients aged <60 years, PFO closure probably confers an important reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence compared with antiplatelet therapy alone but may make no difference compared with anticoagulation. PFO closure incurs a risk of persistent atrial fibrillation and device-related adverse events. Compared with alternatives, anticoagulation probably increases major bleeding.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017081567.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of endovascular patent foramen ovale closure: the first results of a Russian multicenter study

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
D. V. Ognerubov ◽  
A. S. Tereshchenko ◽  
A. N. Samko ◽  
G. К. Arutyunyan ◽  
O. A. Sivakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
History Of ◽  
Pfo Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detectable in more than 25% of the adult population and is generally clinically insignificant. However, it can be a cause of paradoxical embolism in some cases. Randomized trials indicate that endovascular PFO closure in patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke is an effective method for the secondary prevention of catastrophic brain damage.Objective: to study the safety and efficiency of endovascular PFO closure in young patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke.Patients and methods. Sixty-two patients, including (22 males and 40 females) women, underwent percutaneous PFO closure in May 2018 to March 2020. The patients' mean age was 37.4±7.6 years. The inclusion criteria were a prior cryptogenic ischemic stroke lasting less than 12 months and PFO with a high risk for paradoxical embolism (PFO concurrent with atrial septal aneurysm or hypermobility; PFO, ≥2 mm size; the presence of the Chiari network and/or the Eustachian valve).Results and discussion. The technical success of the operation was achieved in all cases. In 50 (80.6%) patients, the right chamber of the heart was completely isolated from the left one in the first 3 months. During the first year, the atria were also completely isolated in 10 (16.1%) patients. A left-to-right shunt persisted in 2 (3.2%) patents 12 months later. Two patients were found to have main procedural complications: one had perioperative atrial fibrillation and the other had pseudoaneurysm formation at the puncture site.Conclusion. Endovascular PFO closure is a safe and effective operation for the secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. In our study, blood shunting through the PFO was stopped in 96.6% of patients at less than 6 months after surgery, which suggests that there is a rapid and effective reduction in the risk of paradoxical embolism.

scholarly journals Device closure for patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke: which patients should get it?

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_M) ◽  
pp. M43-M50
Author(s):  
Iris Parrini ◽  
Enrico Cecchi ◽  
Davide Forno ◽  
Alexander R Lyon ◽  
Riccardo Asteggiano
Keyword(s):  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Device Closure ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Pfo Closure

Abstract Patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke (CS) both have a high prevalence. The optimal treatment to reduce stroke recurrence after CS remains controversial. Results from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and position papers, support percutaneous PFO device closure and medical therapy compared to medical therapy alone. However, the procedure may be associated with cardiac complications including an increased incidence of new atrial fibrillation. The benefit/risk balance should be determined on a case-by-case basis with the greatest benefit of PFO closure in patients with atrial septal aneurysm and PFO with large shunts. Future studies should address unsolved questions such as the choice of medical therapy in patients not undergoing closure, the duration of antiplatelet therapy, and the role of PFO closure in patients over 60 years old.

Abstract 2922: Patent Foramen Ovale Is A Cause Of Ischemic Stroke In Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Shimada
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by a combination of arterial and/or venous thrombosis and recurrent fetal loss, and can be an independent risk factor for a first-ever ischemic stroke especially in young female patients. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been established as a cause of cryptogenic stroke. Atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) is associated with PFO. Until recently, the precise pathophysiology of APS as causing ischemic stroke has been essentially unknown. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between APS and potential embolic sources including PFO and ASA using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods: This study was a retrospective case series design. From July 2006 to June 2008, 120 patients with ischemic stroke who admitted to Juntendo University Hospital underwent TEE. In this study period, consecutive ischemic stoke patients diagnosed as APS based on the modified Sapporo criteria were enrolled and classified into APS group. Controls were selected among age- and gender-matched stroke patients without APS who also underwent TEE. We assessed clinical characteristics and presence of embolic sources including PFO and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) between APS and Control groups. Results: Nine of ischemic stroke patients with APS and 41 controls were included. Primary APS was present in one patient (11.1%) of the APS group, and APS with SLE were found in eight patients (88.9%). There is no significant difference in age, risk factors for ischemic stroke, and MRI findings between two groups. The prevalence of PFO and ASA were significantly higher in APS group compared to Control group (89% vs 41%, P=0.027; 67% vs 20%, P=0.015, respectively). C reactive protein was relatively higher in APS group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that PFO (OR: 13.71; 95% CI: 1.01 to 185.62; P=0.049) and ASA (OR: 8.06; 95% CI: 1.17 to 55.59; P=0.034) were independently associated with the APS group. Conclusion: Atrial septal abnormalities including PFO and ASA are strongly associated with APS group, and could be potential embolic sources in ischemic stroke patients with APS.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale closure by using transesophageal echocardiography for cryptogenic stroke: single center experience in 132 consecutive patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangyang Han ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Fengwei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Contrast Agents ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Percutaneous Closure ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

Abstract Background Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is routinely performed using plain fluoroscopy in the catheter room. This method results in inevitable radiation damage, adverse effects of contrast agents on kidneys, and high cost. We performed PFO closure with a simplified and economical transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-only guided approach in the operating room. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the percutaneous closure of PFO by only using TEE. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure at our center from December 2013 to December 2017. A total of 132 patients with PFO and cryptogenic strokes underwent PFO closure by using cardi-O-fix PFO device under TEE guidance. The participants comprised 64 and 68 male and female patients, respectively. The mean age and body weight of the patients were 39.40 ± 13.22 years old (12–68 years old) and 65.42 ± 9.70 kg (40–95 kg), respectively. All patients only received aspirin (3–5 mg/kg body weight, oral administration) for 6 months. Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) with Valsalva maneuver was performed during follow-up, and questionnaire surveys were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Results All (100%) patients were successfully closed. Follow-ups were conducted for 13 months to 48 months, with an average of 27 months. No severe complications were found during the follow-up period. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurred in 4 patients within 3 months after the procedure. No recurrent stroke or death occurred in all patients during the follow-up period. Transient ischemic attack occurred in one patient 6 months after the procedure. Ten (7.6%) patients had a right-to-left shunt, as demonstrated by c-TTE at 12 months of follow-up. Among the 57 patients suffering from migraine, significant relief or resolution was reported by 42 (73.7%) patients. Conclusion TEE-only guided PFO closure was a safe, feasible, and effective method that did not require the use of X-rays and contrast agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document