scholarly journals Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Corporate Financial Performance Dengan Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Sebagai Variabel I Ntervening (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei)

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syaiful Bahri ◽  
Febby Anggista Cahyani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh kinerja ligkungan terhadap corporate financial performance dengan corporate social responsibility sebagai variabel intervening pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling dengan kriteria (1) sampel penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2013-2014. (2) perusahaan manufaktur yang melaporkan corporate social responsibility (CSR) periode 20132014. (3) perusahaan manufaktur yang telah mengikuti Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahan dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (PROPER) tahun 2013-2014. Jenis penelitian ini adalah statistic deskriptif dengan teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi linear berganda dan analisis jalur. Uji hipotesis menggunakan alat statistik berupa koefisien determinasi dan uji t.Hasil analisis dengan menggunakan analisis regresi  ini menunjukkan bahwa kinerja lingkungan berpengaruh terhadap kinerja keuangan, kinerja lingkungan berpengaruh terhadap CSR, CSR berpengaruh terhadap kinerja keuangan dan uji hipotesis menggunakan analisis jalur menunjukkan secara langsung CSR dapat memediasi hubungan antara  kinerja lingkungan dengan CSR. Kata kunci : kinerja lingkungan, corporate financial performance (CFP) dan corporate social performance (CSR), PROPER

scholarly journals PENGARUH KINERJA LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE DENGAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Riska Rusmaningsih ◽  
Iwan Setiadi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Path Analysis ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to analyze the effect of environmental performance on Corporate Financial Performance (CSP) with Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) as an intervening variable. With the number of research samples as many as 60 samples who were determined by the purposive sampling method. Tests were carried out using the path analysis test. The results of this study indicate that environmental performance affects CFP, environmental performance affects CSRD, CSRD affects CFP, and environmental performance affects CFP without going through the CSRD.

Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Jui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Asian Economy ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractPrevious research has analyzed and debated corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) independently. This paper aims to empirically explore the interrelationship between CG, CSR, financial performance (FP) and Corporate Social Performance (CSP) using a sample of 297 electronics companies operating in Taiwan, a newly industrialized Asian economy. The results show that a CG model which includes independent outside directors and which has specific ownership characteristics has a significantly positive impact on both FP and CSP, whereas FP itself does not influence CSP. The presence of independent outside directors in the firm has the greatest impact on the social performance of the firm's worker, customer, supplier, community and society dimensions. Government shareholders enhance a firm's social performance extraordinarily because government shareholders will be more likely to request that companies fulfill their social responsibilities. Only government shareholders positively and significantly relate to a firm's environmental performance. Furthermore, foreign institutional stockholders help to increase worker and supplier performance by paying more attention to employee policies and supply chain relationships. Finally, independent outside directors, foreign institutional stockholders and domestic financial institutional stockholders are shown to improve financial performance.

scholarly journals Impact of Companies’ Characteristics on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Corporate financial Performance - An Empirical Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayeed Zafar Qazi ◽  
Parvesh Kumar Aspal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Corporate Financial Performance ◽  
Economic Point ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Strategic managers are persistently accosting with the decision of switching the scared corporate resource for the community welfare to balance the shareholders’ and multiple stakeholders’ interests. Corporate houses are presumed to not only intensify the economic priorities of investors, but must also consider the community and environmental ramifications as well. Presently, corporations are in dilemma over whether investment in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives will be a cost or gain from an economic point of view. For this purpose, the association between CSR disclosure and corporate financial performance has been empirically explored and also the company characteristic has been considered as a significant and interesting factor influencing the association between CSR and corporate financial performance. The prime objective of the present paper is to examine the impact of companies’ characteristics i.e., Age of company on the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate financial performance. Panel data regression statistical technique has been applied to investigate and analyze the relationship. The findings of the study reveal that companies CSR have significant influence on their financial performances.  But, on the other hand the company characteristic, age of the company has no significant impact on the corporate financial performance. The findings are found consistent with earlier studies, which validate the company’s venture in undertaking the CSR initiatives. The present study addresses theoretical as well as empirical support and inspiration for the corporations towards CSR initiatives.

Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Jui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Asian Economy ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractPrevious research has analyzed and debated corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) independently. This paper aims to empirically explore the interrelationship between CG, CSR, financial performance (FP) and Corporate Social Performance (CSP) using a sample of 297 electronics companies operating in Taiwan, a newly industrialized Asian economy. The results show that a CG model which includes independent outside directors and which has specific ownership characteristics has a significantly positive impact on both FP and CSP, whereas FP itself does not influence CSP. The presence of independent outside directors in the firm has the greatest impact on the social performance of the firm's worker, customer, supplier, community and society dimensions. Government shareholders enhance a firm's social performance extraordinarily because government shareholders will be more likely to request that companies fulfill their social responsibilities. Only government shareholders positively and significantly relate to a firm's environmental performance. Furthermore, foreign institutional stockholders help to increase worker and supplier performance by paying more attention to employee policies and supply chain relationships. Finally, independent outside directors, foreign institutional stockholders and domestic financial institutional stockholders are shown to improve financial performance.

scholarly journals A Quantitative Analysis for the Correlation Between Corporate Financial and Social Performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Wafaa Salah ◽  
Mostafa Abdelhady Salama
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Operating Income ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Report ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

Recently, the corporate social performance (CSP) is not less important than the corporate financial performance (CFP). Debate still exists about the nature of the relationship between the CSP and CFP, whether it is a positive, negative or a neutral correlation. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports and CFP. The study uses the accounting-based and market-based quantitative measures to quantify the financial performance of seven organizations listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange in 2007-2014. Then uses the information retrieval technologies to quantify the contribution of each of the three dimensions of the corporate social responsibility report (environmental, social and economic). Finally, the correlation between these two sets of variables is viewed together in a model to detect the correlations between them. This model is applied on seven firms that generate social responsibility reports. The results show a positive correlation between the Earnings per share (market-based measure) and the economical dimension in the CSR report. On the other hand, total assets and property, plant and equipment (accounting-based measure) are positively correlated to the environmental and social dimensions of the CSR reports. While there is not any significant relationship between ROA, ROE, Operating income and corporate social responsibility. This study contributes to the literature by providing more clarification of the relationship between CFP and the isolated CSR activities in a developing country.

Board Composition Diversity and Corporate Social Reporting: An Empirical Study in Bangladesh Perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Commercial Banking ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The study examines the relationship between diversity of firm’s board composition and corporate social responsibility reporting of Bangladeshi listed commercial banking firms in the period from 2011 to 2015. Corporate social responsibility disclosure index indicates lower level of disclosure issues with extensive narrative discussion. The study finds significant positive relationship of board activity, board expertise with corporate social responsibility disclosure. It is also found that board ownership and CEO/ chairman duality are negatively associated with corporate social responsibility disclosure having negative impact on bank’s corporate social performance and reporting. The study did not find any evidence related with independent board members to have significant positive impact on CSR disclosure of banking firms. The findings of the study are expected to have important implications for wider stakeholder society and will create further research scope in future.

scholarly journals Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from the financial sector.

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Gaia Soana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) entail economic and financial loss or does it guarantee competitive advantage? To answer this question, many studies have aimed to establish, largely in samples from multiple industries, the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). These studies have produced conflicting results and any attempt to give a generalised and coherent conclusion has proved inadequate. This paper investigates the possible connection between CSP (measured by ethical rating) and CFP (measured by price-to-book-value) in a sample of international financial intermediaries. Although most previous contributions seem to confirm the hypothesis of the existence of a positive relationship between the two variables, the paper finds no clear evidence of a significant relationship between CSP and CFP in the financial sector.

Bringing theory to practice: how to extract value from corporate social responsibility

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Federica Izzo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Business Strategy ◽  
Corporate Social Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose – This contribution aims to clarify the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an issue of governance and a strategic tool more than a mere communication activity, with a potential impact on both organizations and their economic and financial performance. Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides an overview of the literature contribution on CSR and its impact on value, offering a new conceptual model useful both for managers and relevant stakeholders in assessing, through an integrated approach, the company performance. Findings – The analysis focuses on how CSR investments can create value for companies and for stakeholders in general. This can occur if the related benefits exceed the related costs, generating a favorable balance toward what we called the virtuous cycle of CSR. This cycle is made up of four steps – decision, design, action and result – that define a potential value creation path that a responsible firm can take, assuming that it integrates a social agenda into its competitive strategy and assuming that the market appreciates real and effective social efforts of companies. Research limitations/implications – Because the descriptive chosen approach, the research could be enriched with a quantitative analysis to test the proposed propositions further. Originality/value – This paper fulfils the need, identified in the major literature, of a temporary ceasefire on corporate social performance and its link to financial performance, focusing on tools and instruments that can practically modify the companies' approach to CSR and the evaluation processes of its impact on business, strategy and disclosure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document