scholarly journals The use of molecular-genetic and phytopathological methods to identify genes for effective leaf rust resistance in Aegilops accessions

2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
L. G. Tyryshkin ◽  
M. A. Kolesova

Background. Identification of effective genes for disease resistance in resistant plant samples is the most important step toward recommending them for breeding. There are three main methods for such identification: hybridological analysis, phytopathological test, and DNA marking. The method of PCR markers is widely used in Russia to identify resistance genes in wheat relatives, including the genus Aegi lops L. for resistance to leaf rust. From a theoretical viewpoint, the presence of a certain amplification fragment can hardly be interpreted as a definite proof of the presence of a resistance gene: during the species evolution, recombinations and mutations could occur, resulting in disturbance of the fragment’s presence and phenotypic expression of its connection with resistance. The purpose of this work was a comparison between molecular-genetic and phytopathological methods to identify leaf rust resistance genes Lr9 and Lr41 in three Aegilops species.Materials and methods. We identified leaf rust resistance genes Lr9 and Lr41 in forty Aegilops accessions using PCR with J13 and GDM35 primers, respectively. In the phytopathological test, the seedlings were infected with the pathogen population (avirulent to Lr9 and Lr41 genes) and the fungus clones virulent to the wheat line with the Lr9 gene.Results and conclusions. According to the data of molecular marking, the Lr41 gene was present in twelve Ae. tauschii Coss. accessions; Lr9 in four Ae umbellulata Zhuk. accessions and four of Ae. biuncialis Vis. All accessions of Ae. tauschii, two of Ae. umbellulata, and three of Ae. biuncialis, possessing effective resistance genes according to the molecular testing, were susceptible to the pathogen population. For three Ae. umbellulata accessions resistant to the population, where DNA marking failed to identify an Lr9 gene, the presence of this gene was shown by a phytopathological test. Thus, there were significant differences in the postulation of effective Lr9 and Lr41 leaf rust resistance genes in Aegilops accessions after a phytopatological test and the use of DNA markers.

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Martin ◽  
Oswaldo Chicaiza ◽  
Juan C. Caffarel ◽  
Ahmad H. Sallam ◽  
Arnis Druka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Tomkowiak ◽  
Roksana Skowrońska ◽  
Alicja Buda ◽  
Danuta Kurasiak-Popowska ◽  
Jerzy Nawracała ◽  
...  

AbstractTen leading wheat cultivars originating from the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute (IHAR) - National Research Institute (Poland) and the Department of Gene Bank (Czech Republic) were used to establish a field experiment in 2017 and 2018 at the Dłoń Experimental Farm. The analyzed wheat genotypes were characterized by diversified field resistance to leaf rust. Jubilatka, Thatcher and Sparta were the most resistant cultivars in field conditions in both 2017 and 2018. The aim of the work was to identify the Lr11, L13, Lr16 and Lr26 genes encoding resistance to leaf rust using molecular SSR markers (wmc24, wmc261, Xgwm630, Xwmc764 and P6M12) and to develop multiplex PCR conditions to accelerate identification of these genes. Markers of three leaf rust resistance genes have been identified simultaneously in these cultivars. Jubilatka, Thatcher and Sparta cultivars may serve as a good source of the analyzed leaf rust resistance genes. In addition, multiplex PCR conditions have been developed for the simultaneous identification of the Lr11 and Lr16 and Lr11 and Lr26 gene pairs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Mammadov ◽  
W. S. Brooks ◽  
C. A. Griffey ◽  
M. A. Saghai Maroof

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1580-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-hong SHI ◽  
Na ZHANG ◽  
Ya-ya HU ◽  
Xue-jun WEI ◽  
Wen-xiang YANG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document