scholarly journals A Critical Review of Property Tax and Comprehensive Real Estate Tax on Housing

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-43
Author(s):  
Byung Wook Jun
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gambke

AbstractThis article describes the concept of a property levy („Vermögensabga be“) of the German Green Party in the context of other property related taxes such as real estate tax and inheritance tax. It explains the advantages of a property levy in contrast to a property tax. Moreover, the necessity to reduce public debts and to stop the unabated evolution of unequal property is outlined.


2020 ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
Vasyl DEMIANYSHYN ◽  
Volodymyr HORYN

Introduction. With the approval of the concept of inclusive development, the demand for scientific research aimed at finding ways to implement it in financial practice is growing, which will have a positive impact on indicators of public welfare. In this context, an important task is to ensure the integration of the principles of inclusive development into the practice of property taxation, which will ensure an increase in its efficiency and fairness. The purpose is to reveal the social aspects of property tax, including assessing the compliance of the tax collection mechanism with the principles of fairness and inclusiveness of taxation, as well as the impact of property tax on the welfare of payers, taking into account their differentiation by the level of personal income. Methods. In the article, when studying the social aspects of levying property tax, general scientific and special methods are applied, namely, generalization, comparison, grouping, tabular analysis. Results. It has been substantiated that property tax has a varied effect on public welfare, acting as a tool for ensuring the redistribution of wealth between various social groups, attracting shadow incomes to taxation, withdrawn from it thanks to schemes to minimize tax liabilities, an instrument for curbing speculation in the housing market, as well as an important source of budget revenues, which are largely directed to social goals. It has been proven that in domestic practice, real estate tax has a pronounced regressiveness and discriminatory nature in relation to payers with lower incomes. Real estate tax rates are too low, which is more beneficial for wealthy citizens and leads to losses in local budget revenues. This made it possible to argue the advisability of switching to a cost approach to determining the tax base, but only available within an appropriate institutional environment. Perspectives. Further scientific research should be directed towards finding the optimal approach to establishing the base of real estate, as well as ensuring the inclusiveness of taxation, when opportunities for tax evasion will be minimized.


ECONOMICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Milan Tadić

Summary The real estate tax is usually a fiscal instrument which performs the property tax. When it comes to real property or immovable this term include: apartments, houses, land, cottages, excess housing landscape and more. The real estate tax as a form of the fiscal charges ownership or use of certain forms of real estate, and the revenue from this tax is levied on the area where the property is located regardless of the place of residence of its owner. The tax base for the calculation of this tax usually consists of the market, estimated or annuity value of certain real estate. This form of taxation in the Republic of Serbian applies from 1.1.2012., and its introduction has been replaced by former property taxes. The differences between the two concepts mentioned taxes are numerous and significant. Among the more important are: subject to taxation under the new concept of the real estate rather than law, a taxpayer is any property owner rather than the holder of rights to immovable property tax base is the market value of real estate which is replaced by the payment of taxes per square meter of usable area, the rate of property tax is determined local government, which can not be lower than 0.05% of the estimated value of the real estate nor higher than 0.5% of the appraised value of real estate. The last change, ie. The new law on Property Tax from 5.11.2015. was determined by the tax rate to 20%. The fact that local governments each of them determines the tax rate on real estate which range from high to low rates of multiple, makes this tax is progressive. Progression is particularly expressed in the distinction applied tax rates of developed and undeveloped municipalities, where we have a case that less developed tolerate a higher tax burden, which leads to negative economic effects. However, real estate tax has its own economic and social characteristics which must be aligned with the objectives of tax policy. This means that the real estate tax should be considered from the standpoint of the entire tax system and not from the standpoint of individual income tax forms.


1974 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
John E. Gerweck ◽  
Donald J. Epp

Studia BAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (65) ◽  
pp. 55-75
Author(s):  
Joanna Śmiechowicz

The article focuses on the fiscal efficiency of local taxes which in Poland are levies on wealth, i.e., real estate tax, means of transport tax, agricultural tax and forestry tax. The author discusses the determinants of fiscal efficiency of local taxes. Special attention is given to the analysis and assessment of fiscal importance of these taxes for municipalities and cities with powiat status, and to the role of public revenues for local government budgets. The author also compares fiscal efficiency of local taxes from the point of view of various types of their recipients and different levels of local government in Poland.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document