Application of a Combined Approach Based on Analytical Approximations and Construction of Gravity Field Integral Curves for the Interpretation of Marine and Airborne Gravimetric Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-624
Author(s):  
I. E. Stepanova ◽  
A. V. Shchepetilov ◽  
A. M. Salnikov ◽  
P. S. Mikhailov ◽  
V. V. Pogorelov ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1385-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Teixeira da Encarnação ◽  
Pieter Visser ◽  
Daniel Arnold ◽  
Aleš Bezdek ◽  
Eelco Doornbos ◽  
...  

Abstract. Although the knowledge of the gravity of the Earth has improved considerably with CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE (see appendices for a list of abbreviations) satellite missions, the geophysical community has identified the need for the continued monitoring of the time-variable component with the purpose of estimating the hydrological and glaciological yearly cycles and long-term trends. Currently, the GRACE-FO satellites are the sole dedicated provider of these data, while previously the GRACE mission fulfilled that role for 15 years. There is a data gap spanning from July 2017 to May 2018 between the end of the GRACE mission and start the of GRACE-FO, while the Swarm satellites have collected gravimetric data with their GPS receivers since December 2013. We present high-quality gravity field models (GFMs) from Swarm data that constitute an alternative and independent source of gravimetric data, which could help alleviate the consequences of the 10-month gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO, as well as the short gaps in the existing GRACE and GRACE-FO monthly time series. The geodetic community has realized that the combination of different gravity field solutions is superior to any individual model and set up the Combination Service of Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) under the umbrella of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS), part of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). We exploit this fact and deliver the highest-quality monthly GFMs, resulting from the combination of four different gravity field estimation approaches. All solutions are unconstrained and estimated independently from month to month. We tested the added value of including kinematic baselines (KBs) in our estimation of GFMs and conclude that there is no significant improvement. The non-gravitational accelerations measured by the accelerometer on board Swarm C were also included in our processing to determine if this would improve the quality of the GFMs, but we observed that is only the case when the amplitude of the non-gravitational accelerations is higher than during the current quiet period in solar activity. Using GRACE data for comparison, we demonstrate that the geophysical signal in the Swarm GFMs is largely restricted to spherical harmonic degrees below 12. A 750 km smoothing radius is suitable to retrieve the temporal variations in Earth's gravity field over land areas since mid-2015 with roughly 4 cm equivalent water height (EWH) agreement with respect to GRACE. Over ocean areas, we illustrate that a more intense smoothing with 3000 km radius is necessary to resolve large-scale gravity variations, which agree with GRACE roughly at the level of 1 cm EWH, while at these spatial scales the GRACE observes variations with amplitudes between 0.3 and 1 cm EWH. The agreement with GRACE and GRACE-FO over nine selected large basins under analysis is 0.91 cm, 0.76 cm yr−1, and 0.79 in terms of temporal mean, trend, and correlation coefficient, respectively. The Swarm monthly models are distributed on a quarterly basis at ESA's Earth Swarm Data Access (at https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/, last access: 5 June 2020, follow Level2longterm and then EGF) and at the International Centre for Global Earth Models (http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/series/02_COST-G/Swarm, last access: 5 June 2020), as well as identified with the DOI https://doi.org/10.5880/ICGEM.2019.006 (Encarnacao et al., 2019).


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Romeshkani ◽  
Mehdi Eshagh

The Earth's global gravity field modelling is an important subject in Physical Geodesy. For this purpose different satellite gravimetry missions have been designed and launched. Satellite gravity gradiometry (SGG) is a technique to measure the second-order derivatives of the gravity field. The gravity field and steady state ocean circulation explorer (GOCE) is the first satellite mission which uses this technique and is dedicated to recover Earth's gravity models (EGMs) up to medium wavelengths. The existing terrestrial gravimetric data and EGM scan be used for validation of the GOCE data prior to their use. In this research, the tensor of gravitation in the local north-oriented frame is generated using deterministically-modified integral estimators involving terrestrial data and EGMs. The paper presents that the SGG data is assessable with an accuracy of 1-2 mE in Fennoscandia using a modified integral estimatorby the Molodensky method. A degree of modification of 100 and an integration cap size of for integrating terrestrial data are proper parameters for the estimator.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Teixeira Encarnação ◽  
Pieter Visser ◽  
Daniel Arnold ◽  
Ales Bezdek ◽  
Eelco Doornbos ◽  
...  

Abstract. Although the knowledge of the gravity of the Earth has improved considerably with CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE satellite missions, the geophysical community has identified the need for the continued monitoring of the time-variable component with the purpose of estimating the hydrological and glaciological yearly cycles and long-term trends. Currently, the GRACE-FO satellites are the sole dedicated provider of these data, while previously the GRACE mission fulfilled that role for 15 years. There is a data gap spanning from July 2017 to May 2018 between the end of the GRACE mission and start the of GRACE-FO, while the Swarm satellites have collected gravimetric data with their GPS receivers since December 2013. We present high-quality gravity field models from Swarm data that constitute an alternative and independent source of gravimetric data, which could help alleviate the consequences of the 10-month gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO, as well as the short gaps in the existing GRACE and GRACE-FO monthly time series. The geodetic community has realized that the combination of different gravity field solutions is superior to any individual model and set up a Combination Service of Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) under the umbrella of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS), part of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). We exploit this fact and deliver to the highest quality monthly-independent gravity field models, resulting from the combination of four different gravity field estimation approaches. All solutions are unconstrained and estimated independently from month to month. We tested the added value of including Kinematic Baselines (KBs) in our estimation of Gravity Field Models (GFMs) and conclude that there is no significant improvement. The non-gravitational accelerations measured by the accelerometer on-board Swarm-C were also included in our processing to determine if this would improve the quality of the GFMs, but observed that is only the case when the amplitude of the non-gravitational accelerations is higher than during the current quiet period in solar activity. Using GRACE data for comparison, we demonstrate that the geophysical signal in the Swarm gravity field models is largely restricted to Spherical Harmonic degrees below 12. A 750 km smoothing radius is suitable to retrieve the temporal variations of Earth’s gravity field over land areas since mid-2015 with roughly 4 cm Equivalent Water Height (EWH) agreement with respect to a GRACE-derived parametric model. Over ocean areas, we illustrate that a more intense smoothing with 3000 km radius is necessary to resolve large scale gravity variations, which agree with the aforementioned parametric model under 2 cm EWH, while at these spatial scales the model represents variations with amplitudes between 2 and 3.5 cm EWH. The agreement with GRACE and GRACE-FO over nine selected large basins under analyses is 1.19 cm, 0.60 cm/year and 0.75 in terms of temporal mean, trend and correlation coefficient, respectively.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. E184-E189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayer Cinar ◽  
Onur S. Goksel ◽  
Sinan Kut ◽  
Veysel Sahin ◽  
Yavuz Enc ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document