Generating new approaches to stigma reduction interventions: Recommendations from the 2017 Weight Stigma Conference

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Cain ◽  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e0162993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Hilbert

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Fox ◽  
◽  
Kelly Park ◽  
Pamela Schaff ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Briony Hill ◽  
Angela C. Incollingo Rodriguez

AbstractWeight stigma is a pervasive issue promoting significant adverse health and psychosocial consequences. Preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women are particularly vulnerable to weight stigma, which can directly impact their health and that of the next generation. Of note, weight stigma affects women living with obesity who are already at risk for developing gestational diabetes and experiencing associated stigmas. This narrative review aimed to examine the literature on weight stigma across the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods, specifically to (1) synthesize the evidence using a socioecological lens; (2) develop a conceptual model of weight stigma tailored to women across this life phase; and (3) provide recommendations for future research. To date, weight stigma research across the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods has focused predominately on pregnancy and antenatal care. The drivers and facilitators of this stigma are pervasive, occurring across various contexts and settings. Manifestations of weight stigma include decreased reproductive healthcare quality, mental health symptoms, poorer health behaviors, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Future research should further investigate the experiences of women preconception and postpartum, and health/social impacts beyond healthcare. The model herein will guide such research to ultimately identify opportunities for stigma reduction and improve multigenerational health and well-being outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Bartsch ◽  
David Estes

Abstract In challenging the assumption of autistic social uninterest, Jaswal & Akhtar have opened the door to scrutinizing similar unexamined assumptions embedded in other literatures, such as those on children's typically developing behaviors regarding others’ minds and morals. Extending skeptical analysis to other areas may reveal new approaches for evaluating competing claims regarding social interest in autistic individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document