Comparative study of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury with or without mass lesion

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Yuan ◽  
H. Liu ◽  
X. Wu ◽  
Y. Sun ◽  
J. Hu
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Yang ◽  
Jia-Rui Zhang ◽  
Gang Zhu ◽  
Hao Guo ◽  
Fei Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although operative indications for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been evaluated, neurosurgeons often face a dilemma of whether or not to remove the bone flap after mass lesion evacuation, and a useful predictive scoring model for which patients should be decompressive craniectomy (DC) has yet to be developed. The aim of this study was firstly to compare the outcomes of craniotomy and DC, and secondly to determine independent predictors and develop a multivariate logistic regression equation to determine whom should perform primary DC in TBI patients with mass lesions.Methods: A total of nine different variables were evaluated. All 245 patients with severe TBI in this study were retrospectively evaluated between June 2015 and May 2019 and all underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC) or craniotomy for mass lesion removal. The 6-month mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) were compared between DC and craniotomy. By using univariate, multiple logistic regression and prognostic regression scoring equations it was possible to draw Receiver Operating Characteristic curves (ROC) to predict the decision for DC.Results: The overall 6-month mortality in the entire cohort was 11.43% (28/245). DC patients had a lower mean preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p = 0.01); more patients with GCS of 6 (p=0.007);more unresponsive pupillary light reflex (p< 0.001); more closed basal cisterns (p< 0.001); and more patients with diffuse injury (p=0.025) than craniotomy patients. Given the greater severity, patients undergoing primary DC had higher 6-month mortality than the remainder of the cohort. However, in the surviving patients, the favorable GOSE rate was similar in two groups. We found that pupillary light reflex and basal cisterns were independent predictors for DC decision. Using ROC curve to predict the probability of DC, the sensitivity was 81.6% and the specificity was 84.9%.Conclusion: Our preliminary findings showed that the primary DC may benefit subgroups of sTBI with mass lesions, and unresponsive pre-op pupil reaction, and closed basal cistern to predict the DC decision were useful. These sensitive variables can be used as a referential guideline in our daily practice to decide to perform or avoid primary DC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hosseinali Khalili ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Amin Niakan ◽  
Nasim Golestani ◽  
Iman Ahrari ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Rauen ◽  
Lara Reichelt ◽  
Philipp Probst ◽  
Barbara Sch&auml;pers ◽  
Friedemann M&uuml;ller ◽  
...  

Trauma ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 146040862093576
Author(s):  
Nida Fatima ◽  
Mujeeb-Ur-Rehman ◽  
Samia Shaukat ◽  
Ashfaq Shuaib ◽  
Ali Raza ◽  
...  

Objectives Decompressive craniectomy is a last-tier therapy in the treatment of raised intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. We report the association of demographic, radiographic, and injury characteristics with outcome parameters in early (<24 h) and late (≥24 h) decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury. Methods We retrospectively identified 204 patients (158 (early decompressive craniectomy) and 46 (late decompressive craniectomy)), with a median age of 34 years (range 2–78 years) between 2015 and 2018. The primary endpoint was Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 60 days, while secondary endpoints included Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at discharge, mortality at 30 days, and length of hospital stay. Regression analysis was used to assess the independent predictive variables of functional outcome. Results With a clinical follow-up of 60 days, the good functional outcome (GOSE = 5–8) was 73.5% versus 74.1% (p = 0.75) in early and late decompressive craniectomy, respectively. GCS ≥ 9 at discharge was 82.2% versus 91.3% (p = 0.21), mortality at 30 days was 10.8% versus 8.7% (p = 0.39), and length of stay in the hospital was 21 days versus 28 days (p = 0.20), respectively, in early and late decompressive craniectomy groups. Univariate analysis identified that GCS at admission (0.07 (0.32–0.18; < 0.05)) and indication for decompressive craniectomy (3.7 (1.3–11.01; 0.01)) are significantly associated with good functional outcome. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that GCS at admission (<9/≥9) (0.07 (0.03–0.16; <0.05)) and indication for decompressive craniectomy (extradural alone/ other hematoma) (1.75 (1.09–3.25; 0.02)) were significant independent predictors of good functional outcome irrespective of the timing of surgery. Conclusions Our results corroborate that the timing of surgery does not affect the outcome parameters. Furthermore, GCS ≥ 9 and/or extra dural hematoma are associated with relatively good clinical outcome after decompressive craniectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document